Skip to content

fix(controller): Add operationId usage to improve client generation#26

Merged
theEvilReaper merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
fix/operationId
Aug 16, 2025
Merged

fix(controller): Add operationId usage to improve client generation#26
theEvilReaper merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
fix/operationId

Conversation

@theEvilReaper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Proposed changes

This pull request introduces the usage of operationId in Swagger annotations. Defining explicit operation IDs helps improve client generation by producing more stable and predictable method names.

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of
them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before
merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

@theEvilReaper theEvilReaper self-assigned this Aug 16, 2025
@theEvilReaper theEvilReaper changed the title fix(controller): Improve operationId usage to improve client generation fix(controller): Add operationId usage to improve client generation Aug 16, 2025
@theEvilReaper theEvilReaper merged commit e8b356a into next Aug 16, 2025
5 checks passed
@theEvilReaper theEvilReaper deleted the fix/operationId branch December 9, 2025 07:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants