Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
47 lines (28 loc) · 2.54 KB

File metadata and controls

47 lines (28 loc) · 2.54 KB

Support

A few ways to get help, roughly in order of how fast each one gets you an answer.

I'm stuck; where do I start?

  1. Part 27 — Gotchas & FAQ — symptom-indexed. Paste your error; most of them are here.
  2. Part 28 — Glossary — if a term in the guide is unfamiliar.
  3. SCORECARD.md — run your setup against the 50-item scorecard. Whatever's unchecked is usually the answer.
  4. Part 26 — Migration Guide — if you suspect a recent OpenClaw upgrade caused the issue.

I found a bug in the guide

Open an issue using the Correction template. Include:

  • The specific Part + line (or a direct GitHub permalink).
  • What the guide says.
  • What you believe is correct, and a source (release notes, your own test output).
  • The OpenClaw version you're on.

I think something's missing

Open an issue using the Gap template. Describe the scenario you wish the guide covered.

OpenClaw just cut a new release and the guide hasn't caught up

Open an issue using the Version Bump template. Paste the relevant link to the release notes. We usually turn these around within 48 hours of a stable release.

I have a security-sensitive concern about the guide

See SECURITY.md. Use GitHub's private vulnerability reporting — do not open a public issue.

I need help with OpenClaw itself, not this guide

This repo isn't the right place. Try these, in order:

  1. Official docs at clawdocs.org.
  2. OpenClaw Discord#self-hosting and #skills-security are the most responsive channels.
  3. openclaw/openclaw GitHub issues — if you've localized the problem to the core framework.

I want to contribute

See CONTRIBUTING.md. The short version: corrections are always welcome, new parts land via PRs with at least one real-world example, and style follows the decision-tree + "Read this if / Skip if" pattern established across all existing parts.

I want to use this guide at my company / in a book / in a talk

Go ahead — it's MIT-licensed. A link back is appreciated but not required. If you want to quote specific numbers from benchmarks/, also link the methodology doc alongside so your readers can reproduce them.