Replies: 1 comment
-
|
The current architecture is: you → OpenACP → agent → MCP. Direct OpenACP → MCP without an agent intermediary would be a different use case (OpenACP as an MCP client). Makes sense for lightweight tool calls that don't need a full agent session. Worth opening a proper feature request with the use case. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is there a plan to add MCP server call support natively in OpenACP? Right now I'm routing MCP through the agent which feels like a workaround. Direct MCP server invocation from the OpenACP layer would make the architecture much cleaner.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions