Revise README for clarity and updated features

[Code2With-Pratik]

Updated README.md to reflect changes in features and setup instructions.

⚠️ READ BEFORE SUBMITTING ⚠️

We are not currently accepting PRs except for critical bugs.

If this is a bug fix:

• I've opened an issue first
• This was approved by a maintainer

If this is a feature:

This PR will be closed. Please open an issue to discuss first.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README Features section with reorganized descriptions for improved clarity on watermark and subscription offerings.

[vercel]

@Code2With-Pratik is attempting to deploy a commit to the OpenCut OSS Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README "Features" list was reorganized to split a combined feature statement into two separate bullet points, changing "No watermarks or subscriptions" into individual entries for "No watermarks" and "Subscriptions".

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
README Update README.md	Reorganized "Features" section by splitting "No watermarks or subscriptions" into two separate bullet points: "No watermarks" and "Subscriptions".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Upon the features list we trace,
A sentence split with perfect grace,
Where watermarks and subscriptions part,
Each shines alone, a work of art!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Revise README for clarity and updated features' directly relates to the main change - updating the README features list for clarity.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description includes the required template sections but lacks specific details about what changes were made to the README features.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 36-37: The README bullet list mistakenly lists "No watermarks" and
"Subscriptions", which reverses the intended meaning; change the second bullet
back to "No subscriptions" so the bullets read "No watermarks" and "No
subscriptions", and verify consistency with the nearby "Free features" and
"Privacy" lines (the "Free features" and "Privacy" headings/content) to ensure
the doc still communicates a free, privacy-first offering.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8c311994-077b-4a9f-be32-9b4b293f15f3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69da5be and 2efcdb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Critical: Semantic reversal of a key feature.

The change from "No watermarks or subscriptions" to separate bullets "No watermarks" and "Subscriptions" completely reverses the meaning. The original stated the app has no subscriptions (free to use), but listing "Subscriptions" as a feature now suggests the app offers subscriptions (paid model).

This contradicts:

• Line 28: "Free features: Most basic CapCut features are now paywalled" — positioning as a free alternative
• Line 27: "Privacy: Your videos stay on your device" — privacy-first, free value proposition

If the intent was to clarify that the app has no watermarks and no subscriptions, the wording should be:

• "No watermarks"
• "No subscriptions"

If subscriptions are being introduced, this represents a fundamental business model change that should be clearly communicated and discussed with maintainers.

✏️ Proposed fix if intent is to keep the free model

 - No watermarks
-- Subscriptions
+- No subscriptions

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	- No watermarks
	- Subscriptions
	- No watermarks
	- No subscriptions

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@README.md` around lines 36 - 37, The README bullet list mistakenly lists "No
watermarks" and "Subscriptions", which reverses the intended meaning; change the
second bullet back to "No subscriptions" so the bullets read "No watermarks" and
"No subscriptions", and verify consistency with the nearby "Free features" and
"Privacy" lines (the "Free features" and "Privacy" headings/content) to ensure
the doc still communicates a free, privacy-first offering.