diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index cfa2676..407f930 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Claude Code Reviewer
+# Nutrient Code Reviewer
 
 An AI-powered code review GitHub Action using Claude to analyze code changes. Uses a unified multi-agent approach for both code quality (correctness, reliability, performance, maintainability, testing) and security in a single pass. This action provides intelligent, context-aware review for pull requests using Anthropic's Claude Code tool for deep semantic analysis.
 
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ permissions:
 
 on:
   pull_request:
+    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, labeled]
 
 jobs:
   review:
@@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ This action is not hardened against prompt injection attacks and should only be
 | `false-positive-filtering-instructions` | Path to custom false positive filtering instructions text file | None | No |
 | `custom-review-instructions` | Path to custom code review instructions text file to append to the audit prompt | None | No |
 | `custom-security-scan-instructions` | Path to custom security scan instructions text file to append to the security section | None | No |
+| `dismiss-stale-reviews` | Dismiss previous bot reviews when posting a new review (useful for follow-up commits) | `true` | No |
+| `skip-draft-prs` | Skip code review on draft pull requests | `true` | No |
+| `require-label` | Only run review if this label is present. Leave empty to review all PRs. Add `labeled` to your workflow `pull_request` types to trigger on label addition. | None | No |
 
 ### Action Outputs
 
@@ -150,6 +154,37 @@ The default command is designed to work well in most cases, but it can also be c
 
 It is also possible to configure custom scanning and false positive filtering instructions, see the [`docs/`](docs/) folder for more details.
 
+## Using a Custom GitHub App
+
+By default, reviews are posted as "github-actions[bot]". To use a custom name and avatar:
+
+1. **Create a GitHub App** at `https://github.com/settings/apps/new`
+   - Set your desired name and avatar
+   - Permissions: Pull requests (Read & Write), Contents (Read)
+   - Uncheck "Webhook > Active"
+
+2. **Store secrets** in your repository:
+   - `APP_ID` - The App ID from settings
+   - `APP_PRIVATE_KEY` - Generated private key
+
+3. **Update your workflow**:
+   ```yaml
+   - name: Generate App Token
+     id: app-token
+     uses: actions/create-github-app-token@v1
+     with:
+       app-id: ${{ secrets.APP_ID }}
+       private-key: ${{ secrets.APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
+
+   - uses: PSPDFKit-labs/claude-code-review@main
+     with:
+       claude-api-key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
+     env:
+       GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
+   ```
+
+Review dismissal works automatically with custom apps since reviews are identified by content, not bot username.
+
 ## Testing
 
 Run the test suite to validate functionality:
diff --git a/scripts/comment-pr-findings.bun.test.js b/scripts/comment-pr-findings.bun.test.js
index 0409d9b..03afced 100644
--- a/scripts/comment-pr-findings.bun.test.js
+++ b/scripts/comment-pr-findings.bun.test.js
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ describe('comment-pr-findings.js', () => {
   });
 
   describe('Stale Review Handling', () => {
-    test('should dismiss stale reviews when DISMISS_STALE_REVIEWS is true', async () => {
+    test('should only dismiss own bot reviews when DISMISS_STALE_REVIEWS is true', async () => {
       process.env.DISMISS_STALE_REVIEWS = 'true';
 
       const mockFindings = [{
@@ -863,10 +863,16 @@ describe('comment-pr-findings.js', () => {
       const mockPrFiles = [{ filename: 'test.py', patch: '@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@' }];
 
       const mockReviews = [
-        { id: 101, state: 'CHANGES_REQUESTED', user: { type: 'Bot' } },
-        { id: 102, state: 'APPROVED', user: { type: 'Bot' } },
-        { id: 103, state: 'COMMENTED', user: { type: 'Bot' } }, // Should not be dismissed
-        { id: 104, state: 'CHANGES_REQUESTED', user: { type: 'User' } } // Should not be dismissed
+        // Our reviews - should be dismissed
+        { id: 101, state: 'CHANGES_REQUESTED', user: { type: 'Bot' }, body: 'Found 3 security issues. Please address the high-severity issues before merging.' },
+        { id: 102, state: 'APPROVED', user: { type: 'Bot' }, body: 'No issues found. Changes look good.' },
+        // Other bot reviews - should NOT be dismissed
+        { id: 103, state: 'APPROVED', user: { type: 'Bot' }, body: 'Dependabot has approved this PR.' },
+        { id: 104, state: 'CHANGES_REQUESTED', user: { type: 'Bot' }, body: 'Renovate: This PR has conflicts.' },
+        // COMMENTED state - should NOT be dismissed
+        { id: 105, state: 'COMMENTED', user: { type: 'Bot' }, body: 'Found 1 security issue.' },
+        // User review - should NOT be dismissed
+        { id: 106, state: 'CHANGES_REQUESTED', user: { type: 'User' }, body: 'Please fix the typo.' }
       ];
 
       readFileSyncSpy.mockImplementation((path) => {
@@ -907,10 +913,14 @@ describe('comment-pr-findings.js', () => {
 
       await import('./comment-pr-findings.js');
 
+      // Only our reviews should be dismissed
       expect(dismissedReviews).toContain(101);
       expect(dismissedReviews).toContain(102);
-      expect(dismissedReviews).not.toContain(103); // COMMENTED state
-      expect(dismissedReviews).not.toContain(104); // User review
+      // Other bot reviews should NOT be dismissed
+      expect(dismissedReviews).not.toContain(103); // Dependabot
+      expect(dismissedReviews).not.toContain(104); // Renovate
+      expect(dismissedReviews).not.toContain(105); // COMMENTED state
+      expect(dismissedReviews).not.toContain(106); // User review
       expect(consoleLogSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Dismissed stale review 101');
       expect(consoleLogSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Dismissed stale review 102');
     });
diff --git a/scripts/comment-pr-findings.js b/scripts/comment-pr-findings.js
index d594e31..1774954 100755
--- a/scripts/comment-pr-findings.js
+++ b/scripts/comment-pr-findings.js
@@ -88,7 +88,31 @@ function addReactionsToReview(reviewId) {
   }
 }
 
-// Helper function to dismiss stale bot reviews
+// Check if a review was posted by this action
+function isOwnReview(review) {
+  if (!review.body) return false;
+
+  // Check for our review summary patterns
+  const ownPatterns = [
+    'No issues found. Changes look good.',
+    /^Found \d+ .+ issues?\./,
+    'Please address the high-severity issues before merging.',
+    'Consider addressing the suggestions in the comments.',
+    'Minor suggestions noted in comments.'
+  ];
+
+  for (const pattern of ownPatterns) {
+    if (pattern instanceof RegExp) {
+      if (pattern.test(review.body)) return true;
+    } else {
+      if (review.body.includes(pattern)) return true;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return false;
+}
+
+// Helper function to dismiss stale bot reviews from this action only
 function dismissStaleReviews() {
   try {
     const reviews = ghApi(`/repos/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/pulls/${context.issue.number}/reviews`);
@@ -101,8 +125,9 @@ function dismissStaleReviews() {
     for (const review of reviews) {
       const isDismissible = review.state === 'APPROVED' || review.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED';
       const isBot = review.user && review.user.type === 'Bot';
+      const isOwn = isOwnReview(review);
 
-      if (isBot && isDismissible) {
+      if (isBot && isDismissible && isOwn) {
         try {
           ghApi(
             `/repos/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/pulls/${context.issue.number}/reviews/${review.id}/dismissals`,