Hello! Thanks for the thorough paper!
I'm trying to reproduce your results for MLM L, which state an FID of 3.7, but I'm getting an FID of around 18...
Here's my modification to the sample_fid.sh script:
TORCH_DISTRIBUTED_DEBUG=INFO torchrun --nnodes=1 --nproc_per_node=4 sample_fid.py \
--model GPT-L --modeling mlm --sample_dir images_fid_mlm \
--ckpt /model_home/mlmL-1-16.pth \
--dataset custom --codebook_size 16 --norm_first --num-classes 1000 \
--code-dim 16 --token-each 1 --pos_type rope2d --cfg-scale 3.0 --cfg_schedule linear \
--deterministic --gen_iter_num 256 --temperature 9.0 \
--num_images 32000 --per_proc_batch_size 16 --global_seed 64
And then using the npz from here to compare I get an FID of 18.66.
I had to fix a few small bugs with some missing arguments being passed into the MLM model, but other than that everything was quite straightforward. Am I missing something? The generated images look not too bad but not great.
Hello! Thanks for the thorough paper!
I'm trying to reproduce your results for MLM L, which state an FID of 3.7, but I'm getting an FID of around 18...
Here's my modification to the
sample_fid.shscript:And then using the npz from here to compare I get an FID of 18.66.
I had to fix a few small bugs with some missing arguments being passed into the MLM model, but other than that everything was quite straightforward. Am I missing something? The generated images look not too bad but not great.