Skip to content

Commit a6efc3e

Browse files
authored
Tweak wording
1 parent fede47a commit a6efc3e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 41 additions & 22 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 41 additions & 22 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,38 +1,57 @@
11
## Q2 2026
22

3-
> **Note:** [Q2 planning doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s8LQVo0UThfDx3VSEMBMp1_nmuENRBaiSDKLcTYuol4/edit?tab=t.0)
4-
>
5-
> Ownership will be assigned as we prioritize throughout the quarter.
3+
For reference (internal-only): [Q2 planning doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s8LQVo0UThfDx3VSEMBMp1_nmuENRBaiSDKLcTYuol4/edit?tab=t.0)
64

7-
### Objective 1: 1-PR-merged-a-day
5+
Going as far as it takes to make users feel Inbox is not just "cool" - but awesome.
86

9-
- Auto-create PRs
10-
- Auto-creating PR autonomy slider
11-
- Make PostHog Code Inbox UX spark joy
7+
Principles:
8+
- We eat our own dog food - PostHog Inc. has to be a set of happy Inbox users, and we have a path to that
9+
- Reliabiltity is non-optional - explicitly allocating time to reliability, including devex
1210

13-
### Objective 2: Getting users
11+
_Ownership will be assigned as we prioritize throughout the quarter. Michael makes sure this happens as team lead._
1412

15-
- Make it work for PostHog team 2
16-
- Run user interviews with active PH Code users
17-
- Set up Inbox usage/success/costs dashboard
18-
- Bring back Traces hour for PH Code launch
19-
- Reliability is non-optional
13+
### Objective 1: One PR merged a day
2014

21-
### Objective 3: Prioritization
15+
Self-driving has to deliver concrete code to review and merge:
16+
- Auto-create PRs
17+
- Allow users to configure the level of confidence for PR creation
18+
- Make PostHog Code Inbox UX must spark joy
19+
- Run user interviews
20+
- Annika will be running interviews with active PH Code users, we should take part
2221

22+
### Objective 2: Prioritization
23+
24+
Serving "One PR merged a day":
25+
Prioritization in the inbox has to always surfaces slam dunks above noise:
2326
- Making the agent run queries to determine if the problem is in a hot path
24-
- Micro "analyze part of session visually" tool
25-
- PostHog org member→GH user mapping needed for assignment
26-
- Meta: Ability to reingest all signals in prod is key
27+
- "Analyze part of session visually" tool for research
28+
- Seamless PostHog org member→GH user mapping (for owner assignment)
29+
- Ability to reingest all signals in prod
30+
- Plus ability fo filter by pipeline version
31+
32+
### Objective 3: Sources
33+
34+
Specific sources have to result in salient inbox items:
35+
- Error Tracking
36+
- Linear
37+
- GitHub Issues
38+
- Zendesk
39+
- PostHog Support
40+
- Later in the quarter: Session Replay (much higher-effort w/ Replay team collab)
41+
- Michael to write a spec for the person who'll help us ship here
2742

28-
### Objective 5: Prioritized sources
43+
Other teams integrating: on pause until we have confidence in these core sources.
2944

30-
- Session Replay
31-
- PostHog Support
32-
- (Other teams integrating: on pause until we have confidence in core sources)
45+
### Objective 4: Experiments
3346

34-
### Objective 6: Experiments
47+
We're in delivery mode with PostHog Code launch, but when we have solid footing there. We should get back into some experimentation – we think we have some ideas that _may_ take the product to the next level, but they need to be actually tested:
3548

3649
- "AI PM" - product autonomy → agent "owner" per product feature → run em on a cron to check feature status
3750
- Memory
3851
- Allow agent to schedule follow-up (esp. for LLMA + replay)
52+
53+
### Non-objective: Pricing
54+
55+
Pricing is not a priority before we feel that the Inbox is indeed _awesome_. We should just keep track of costs to keep an eye:
56+
57+
- Set up Inbox usage/success/costs dashboard

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)