forked from openssh/openssh-portable
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 395
Add client-side ControlMaster (connection multiplexing) support #863
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
duncm
wants to merge
10
commits into
PowerShell:latestw_all
Choose a base branch
from
duncm:controlmaster-mux
base: latestw_all
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4cf4878
Add client-side ControlMaster (connection multiplexing) support
duncm 9db8903
Add Pester E2E tests for connection multiplexing
duncm 5333ccb
mux: master-side protocol for tty sessions over multiplexing (Windows)
duncm d39f53a
mux: client-side console relay for tty sessions over multiplexing (Wi…
duncm 0b8e802
tests: assert tty sessions multiplex instead of falling back
duncm 41d7256
ssh: ControlPersist support on Windows via an auto-spawned master
duncm c5a37d3
tests: ControlPersist scenarios for the auto-spawned master
duncm 7b70b0d
tests: make the tty-multiplex assertion robust for CI
duncm b6bdd59
mux: align a struct field comment (whitespace only)
duncm a186749
mux: address PR review feedback (winsize stdin fallback, typo)
duncm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing for non-null here is also a bit hacky since that just so happens to work today. A proper tag would be cleaner, but idk if modifying the struct is a good idea.