Correct CO2 Management Data (#273)

* correct CO2 liquefaction

* add release notes

* Potential fix for pull request finding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* ensure backward compatibility by preserving  technology data

* Add conversion calculation

---------

Co-authored-by: Bobby <36541459+bobbyxng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Neumann <fabian.neumann@outlook.de>

Author: 4 people

docs/release_notes.rst

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Upcoming Release
 ..   The features listed below are not released yet, but will be part of the next release! 
 ..   To use the features already you have to use the ``master`` branch.
 
+* Add technology data for `CO2 dense phase compression` step for transport in large pipelines (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273) which is different from the current `CO2 liquefaction` technology parameters that is take for ship transport.
 * Breaking changes: 
   - Renamed "electricity grid connection" to "distribution grid reinforcement" and updated description for more clarity on the technology and consistency with the source.
 

inputs/manual_input.csv

@@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ NH3 (l) storage tank incl. liquefaction,lifetime,2020,20,years,2010,"Morgan E. 2
 CO2 storage tank,investment,2050,2430,EUR/t_CO2,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, Table 3.","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary."
 CO2 storage tank,FOM,2050,1,%/year,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary."
 CO2 storage tank,lifetime,2050,25,years,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary."
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", "Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h"
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,2024,5,%/year,2024,"Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf",
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,2024,25,years,2024,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,"Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf",
 CO2 liquefaction,investment,2004,12.8928283642224,EUR/t_CO2/h,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction."
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2004,5,%/year,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,
 CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2004,25,years,2004,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",

outputs/US/costs_2020.csv

@@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
 CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,

outputs/US/costs_2025.csv

@@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
 CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,

outputs/US/costs_2030.csv

@@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
 CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,

outputs/US/costs_2035.csv

@@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
 CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,

outputs/US/costs_2040.csv

@@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
 CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,

outputs/US/costs_2045.csv

@@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,,
+CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
 CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,