TST: fix misc. doctest failures (test_doc.py)#463
Conversation
1750d6e to
0297419
Compare
nosetests skips the tests in this file, so run it separately.
0297419 to
4ae270b
Compare
|
Thanks to @rafat for pointing out the issue in openjournals/joss-reviews#1237 It seems that |
This is necessary for running 'make doctest' sucessfully from the doc subfolder
|
If I don't hear any objections I'll go ahead and merge this one soon. I'm not a fan of doctests in general, but since we have them currently, we should run them on CI to make sure they don't get out of date like this in the future. |
|
Thanks @grlee77. All green, so helpful for now.
Agreed. I actually like examples in doctest format, the problem is just that |
Actually we already have it in |
|
Ah good catch. It will need the |
I tried that, but it doesn't seem to do anything. The full output is For comparison, Finally there is the ability to run I think it is more than the above mainly due to inclusion of additional regression tests from |
test_doc.pywas apparently not being run on the CI services and had a number of failures.