Skip to content

Reconsider API spec autogeneration #117

Description

@ztane

This is a controversial thing and I am playing the devil's advocate but I've seen a great push towards FastAPI from Pyramid or sidelining Pyramid completely at our clients, connections and partners just because FastAPI seemingly makes it easier to evolve the API design rapidly with code. Everyone who is actually evolving the API is complaining about having to do the changes twice or thrice to the API document, view code and actual model handling. Only I seem to be defending the design, which might just be because I have never touched the YAML myself :D

Perhaps there could be some hybrid approach that would combine best of both worlds, making it possible to derive the API spec from code up to a point - not unlike how Sphinx Autodoc works for documentation

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions