Documentation page at [1] should be updated to reflect the current MikroTik lack of support for DoH with Quad9, since starting today Quad9 discontinued support for DoH over HTTP/1.1, the only protocol Mikrotik curently supports for DoH.
If I may suggest, maybe leave the page as is but add a huge banner to warn of current lack of support for encrypted requests, and add a second MikroTik_RouterOS_(non-encrypted) page describing only the IP address configuration (9.9.9.9 etc.) .
[1] https://github.com/Quad9DNS/documentation/blob/main/docs/en/Setup_Guides/Open-Source_Routers/MikroTik_RouterOS_(Encrypted).md
PS: For anybody coming from Google because of Quad9 DNS stopped working today :
Blog post: https://quad9.net/news/blog/doh-http-1-1-retirement/
MikroTik forum post: https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/quad9-to-drop-support-for-http-1-1/264174/27
Some MikroTik log messages you might have seen:
DoH server connection error: ERROR parsing http: there was no content-length or transfer-encoding
DoH server connection error: SSL: ssl: close notify received (6)
Documentation page at [1] should be updated to reflect the current MikroTik lack of support for DoH with Quad9, since starting today Quad9 discontinued support for DoH over HTTP/1.1, the only protocol Mikrotik curently supports for DoH.
If I may suggest, maybe leave the page as is but add a huge banner to warn of current lack of support for encrypted requests, and add a second
MikroTik_RouterOS_(non-encrypted)page describing only the IP address configuration (9.9.9.9 etc.) .[1] https://github.com/Quad9DNS/documentation/blob/main/docs/en/Setup_Guides/Open-Source_Routers/MikroTik_RouterOS_(Encrypted).md
PS: For anybody coming from Google because of Quad9 DNS stopped working today :
Blog post: https://quad9.net/news/blog/doh-http-1-1-retirement/
MikroTik forum post: https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/quad9-to-drop-support-for-http-1-1/264174/27
Some MikroTik log messages you might have seen: