Only run logic for selected pytest items

[Liam-DeVoe]

Closes #153.

pytest_collection_finish is the right place to hook pytest for after exactly the tests we want have been selected. I don't think any pytest-run-parallel logic needs to execute for any non-selected item, so we can just wait until this stage in the process.

Note the pytest docs claim 4. Set session.items to the list of collected items comes after 3. pytest_collection_finish(session), but I'm pretty sure this is a docs bug on pytest's end, and these steps should be reversed; I'll send a PR their way.

[Liam-DeVoe]

I don't think any pytest-run-parallel logic needs to execute for any non-selected item, so we can just wait until this stage in the process.

Small caveat: there's now an ordering contention between this and pytest_report_collectionfinish (see 632d3ef), so our pytest_collection_finish needs to be tryfirst=True. I think this is fine, and moreover unlikely to break anything more than the status quo, which already processed items before the user's pytest_collection_finish was called.

[ngoldbaum]

@nickodell would you mind trying this out for your SciPy development workflow?

[nickodell]

@nickodell would you mind trying this out for your SciPy development workflow?

Sure, here is a quick benchmark.

This is benchmarking the test command python3.13 -P -m pytest -m 'not slow' -k test_cdf_nolan_samples --parallel-threads=2 --pyargs scipy.stats. This test command selects a single test case out of SciPy, and runs it in parallel. The actual test is very fast, so this is mostly measuring pytest and pytest-run-parallel's setup overhead.

I measured this in two ways:

• Total time spent, using the time command in Bash to measure time.
• Percent time spent in _is_thread_unsafe, including child functions, using py-spy to record time spent in each function.

The results are the following.

version	time spent	percentage of time spent in _is_thread_unsafe
0.8.0	14.180s	70.6%
gh-156	3.941s	0.6%

It is significantly faster for this use case.

[nickodell]

Gentle ping - is this PR mergable?

[ngoldbaum]

I was waiting for @lysnikolaou to look it over

[lysnikolaou]

LGTM! This is a great improvement. Thanks @Liam-DeVoe!