Align openapi with code structs

[Arshia-r-m]

This Pr propose changes to openapi.yaml to match them more closely to what end-points expect.

Issue defined here #103

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates openapi.yaml to better reflect the Rust API request/response structs (per Issue #103), improving OpenAPI code generation compatibility and schema accuracy.

Changes:

• Added required lists across many schemas to match non-optional Rust fields.
• Tightened numeric schemas (e.g., fee_rate, amount) by switching some number fields to integer and adding formats/min/max constraints.
• Aligned certain schema shapes/names with the code (e.g., proxy_endpoint, using Assignment in more places).

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

[Arshia-r-m]

The problem on tests is from the race condition I mentioned on #105 , I think we can merge this one untill I work on that issue

[zoedberg]

Thanks. Please address the requested changes

[Arshia-r-m]

I fixed and rebased on master, let me know if any thing else requires changes

[zoedberg]

we are almost there, but it seems you forgot to define required in ListAssetsResponse

[Arshia-r-m]

Just to make sure, since you asked me to remove the format fields, do you want to keep this one or we can also drop this?
From my understanding, we have to keep this one since string doesn't explain it properly

[zoedberg]

If I recall correctly without this the swagger interface does not render correctly, but I would appreciate if you could check this

[Arshia-r-m]

I checked, having it is better.

[Arshia-r-m]

Sorry this is taking so long, I did a careful review on the changes, let me know what you do you think on my last comment and then we can proceed, thanks