|
| 1 | +# Track 2: substrate-aware forward-mode autograd via dual numbers. |
| 2 | +# |
| 3 | +# Dual: [value, derivative]. Lift x with dual(x, 1.0), forward-propagate |
| 4 | +# through dual_* ops, read df/dx from dual_d. Substrate metadata follows |
| 5 | +# the value through HInt/HFloat as usual. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +fn assert_eq(actual, expected, msg) { |
| 8 | + if actual != expected { |
| 9 | + test_record_failure(msg + ": expected " + to_string(expected) + " got " + to_string(actual)); |
| 10 | + } |
| 11 | +} |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +fn assert_true(cond, msg) { |
| 14 | + if !cond { test_record_failure(msg); } |
| 15 | +} |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +fn approx_eq(a, b, tol) { |
| 18 | + h d = a - b; |
| 19 | + if d < 0.0 { d = 0.0 - d; } |
| 20 | + return d <= tol; |
| 21 | +} |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +# ---- Constructor / accessors ---- |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +fn test_dual_construct() { |
| 26 | + h x = dual(3.0, 1.0); |
| 27 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(x), 3.0, 0.001), "value"); |
| 28 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(x), 1.0, 0.001), "derivative"); |
| 29 | +} |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +# ---- f(x) = x ; f'(x) = 1 ---- |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +fn test_identity_grad() { |
| 34 | + h x = dual(5.0, 1.0); |
| 35 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(x), 1.0, 0.001), "df/dx of x is 1"); |
| 36 | +} |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +# ---- f(x) = x^2 ; f'(x) = 2x ; at x=3, f'=6 ---- |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +fn test_square_grad() { |
| 41 | + h x = dual(3.0, 1.0); |
| 42 | + h y = dual_mul(x, x); |
| 43 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 9.0, 0.001), "x^2 at 3 = 9"); |
| 44 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 6.0, 0.001), "d/dx x^2 at 3 = 6"); |
| 45 | +} |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +# ---- f(x) = x^3 via dual_pow_int ; f'(x) = 3x^2 ; at x=2, f=8, f'=12 --- |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +fn test_cube_grad_pow() { |
| 50 | + h x = dual(2.0, 1.0); |
| 51 | + h y = dual_pow_int(x, 3); |
| 52 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 8.0, 0.001), "x^3 at 2 = 8"); |
| 53 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 12.0, 0.001), "d/dx x^3 at 2 = 12"); |
| 54 | +} |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +# ---- f(x) = a*x + b (a=2, b=5) ; f'(x) = 2 ---- |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +fn test_affine_grad() { |
| 59 | + h x = dual(7.0, 1.0); |
| 60 | + # constant scalars are treated as duals with deriv=0 |
| 61 | + h y = dual_add(dual_mul(2.0, x), 5.0); |
| 62 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 19.0, 0.001), "2*7+5 = 19"); |
| 63 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 2.0, 0.001), "slope is 2"); |
| 64 | +} |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +# ---- f(x) = (x+1) * (x-1) = x^2 - 1 ; f'(x) = 2x ; at x=4, f'=8 ---- |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +fn test_product_rule() { |
| 69 | + h x = dual(4.0, 1.0); |
| 70 | + h y = dual_mul(dual_add(x, 1.0), dual_sub(x, 1.0)); |
| 71 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 15.0, 0.001), "(x+1)(x-1) at 4 = 15"); |
| 72 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 8.0, 0.001), "deriv at 4 = 8"); |
| 73 | +} |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +# ---- f(x) = 1/x ; f'(x) = -1/x^2 ; at x=2, f'=-0.25 ---- |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +fn test_reciprocal() { |
| 78 | + h x = dual(2.0, 1.0); |
| 79 | + h y = dual_div(1.0, x); |
| 80 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 0.5, 0.001), "1/2 = 0.5"); |
| 81 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 0 - 0.25, 0.001), "d/dx 1/x at 2 = -0.25"); |
| 82 | +} |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +# ---- f(x) = exp(x) ; f'(x) = exp(x) ; at x=0, both 1 ---- |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +fn test_exp_grad() { |
| 87 | + h x = dual(0.0, 1.0); |
| 88 | + h y = dual_exp(x); |
| 89 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 1.0, 0.001), "exp(0) = 1"); |
| 90 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 1.0, 0.001), "d/dx exp(0) = 1"); |
| 91 | +} |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +# ---- f(x) = sin(x) at x=0 ; f=0, f'=cos(0)=1 ---- |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +fn test_sin_grad() { |
| 96 | + h x = dual(0.0, 1.0); |
| 97 | + h y = dual_sin(x); |
| 98 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 0.0, 0.001), "sin(0) = 0"); |
| 99 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 1.0, 0.001), "d/dx sin(0) = 1"); |
| 100 | +} |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +# ---- ReLU branches ---- |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +fn test_relu_positive() { |
| 105 | + h x = dual(3.5, 1.0); |
| 106 | + h y = dual_relu(x); |
| 107 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 3.5, 0.001), "relu(3.5) = 3.5"); |
| 108 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 1.0, 0.001), "relu' on positive = 1"); |
| 109 | +} |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +fn test_relu_negative() { |
| 112 | + h x = dual(0 - 2.0, 1.0); |
| 113 | + h y = dual_relu(x); |
| 114 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 0.0, 0.001), "relu(-2) = 0"); |
| 115 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 0.0, 0.001), "relu' on negative = 0"); |
| 116 | +} |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +# ---- Sigmoid at 0: value 0.5, deriv 0.25 ---- |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +fn test_sigmoid_grad() { |
| 121 | + h x = dual(0.0, 1.0); |
| 122 | + h y = dual_sigmoid(x); |
| 123 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 0.5, 0.001), "sigmoid(0) = 0.5"); |
| 124 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 0.25, 0.001), "sigmoid'(0) = 0.25"); |
| 125 | +} |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +# ---- Tanh at 0: value 0, deriv 1 ---- |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +fn test_tanh_grad() { |
| 130 | + h x = dual(0.0, 1.0); |
| 131 | + h y = dual_tanh(x); |
| 132 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 0.0, 0.001), "tanh(0) = 0"); |
| 133 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 1.0, 0.001), "tanh'(0) = 1"); |
| 134 | +} |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +# ---- Chain rule: f(x) = sigmoid(2x + 1) ; analytic grad at x=0 ---- |
| 137 | +# y = sigmoid(2x + 1). At x=0: u=1, sigmoid(1) = 0.7310586, |
| 138 | +# sigmoid'(1) = 0.7310586*(1 - 0.7310586) = 0.196612. |
| 139 | +# dy/dx = sigmoid'(u) * du/dx = 0.196612 * 2 = 0.393224. |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +fn test_chain_rule_sigmoid() { |
| 142 | + h x = dual(0.0, 1.0); |
| 143 | + h u = dual_add(dual_mul(2.0, x), 1.0); |
| 144 | + h y = dual_sigmoid(u); |
| 145 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 0.7310586, 0.001), "sigmoid(1) value"); |
| 146 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 0.393224, 0.001), "chain-rule deriv"); |
| 147 | +} |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +# ---- Composition: a tiny "neuron" y = sigmoid(w*x + b) ---- |
| 150 | +# At w=0.5, x=2.0, b=0.0: z = 1.0, y = sigmoid(1) = 0.7310586 |
| 151 | +# Want dy/dx with w,b held constant. Lift only x: |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +fn test_neuron_dydx() { |
| 154 | + h w = 0.5; |
| 155 | + h b = 0.0; |
| 156 | + h x = dual(2.0, 1.0); # seed for d/dx |
| 157 | + h z = dual_add(dual_mul(w, x), b); # w*x + b ; dz/dx = w = 0.5 |
| 158 | + h y = dual_sigmoid(z); |
| 159 | + # dy/dz = sigmoid(1)*(1-sigmoid(1)) ≈ 0.196612 ; dy/dx = 0.196612*0.5 |
| 160 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 0.098306, 0.001), "neuron dy/dx"); |
| 161 | +} |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +# ---- Substrate-aware: gradients on Fibonacci-valued inputs ---- |
| 164 | +# Take f(x) = x^2, evaluate at the Fibonacci attractor x=5. |
| 165 | +# Value 25 is non-attractor (closest is 21 or 34) so resonance < 1, |
| 166 | +# but the gradient computation itself is exact: f'(5) = 10. |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +fn test_grad_substrate_input() { |
| 169 | + h x = dual(5.0, 1.0); |
| 170 | + h y = dual_mul(x, x); |
| 171 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(y), 25.0, 0.001), "5^2 = 25"); |
| 172 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(y), 10.0, 0.001), "f'(5) = 10"); |
| 173 | +} |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +# ---- Quadratic loss: L = (y_hat - y)^2 ; dL/dy_hat = 2(y_hat - y) --- |
| 176 | +# y_hat = w*x. At w=3, x=2 (y_hat=6, y=5): L=1, dL/dw via chain = 2*1*2 = 4 |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +fn test_loss_grad_w() { |
| 179 | + h w = dual(3.0, 1.0); # seed d/dw |
| 180 | + h x = 2.0; |
| 181 | + h y_target = 5.0; |
| 182 | + h y_hat = dual_mul(w, x); # 6 ; dy_hat/dw = 2 |
| 183 | + h diff = dual_sub(y_hat, y_target); # 1 ; ddiff/dw = 2 |
| 184 | + h L = dual_mul(diff, diff); # 1 ; dL/dw = 2*1*2 = 4 |
| 185 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_v(L), 1.0, 0.001), "loss = 1"); |
| 186 | + assert_true(approx_eq(dual_d(L), 4.0, 0.001), "dL/dw = 4"); |
| 187 | +} |
0 commit comments