Skip to content

[pull] main from MetaMask:main#31

Merged
pull[bot] merged 10 commits into
Reality2byte:mainfrom
MetaMask:main
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

[pull] main from MetaMask:main#31
pull[bot] merged 10 commits into
Reality2byte:mainfrom
MetaMask:main

Conversation

@pull

@pull pull Bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.3)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

infiniteflower and others added 10 commits July 30, 2025 17:31
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

This PR fixes an issue where the Bridge API would be polled indefinitely
even if the txHash would never be found (due to a bug where it was
submitted on the wrong chain).

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry: null

## **Related issues**

Fixes: https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/SWAPS-2010

Related to MetaMask/core#6149
Patch is from this branch:
MetaMask/core@main...patch/bridge-status-controller-36.1.0-mobile-ledger-fix

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Modify
`node_modules/@metamask/bridge-status-controller/dist/utils/bridge-status.mjs`
to fetch a fake txHash

```
const fetchBridgeTxStatus = async (statusRequest, clientId, fetchFn, bridgeApiBaseUrl) => {
    const statusRequestDto = (0, exports.getStatusRequestDto)(statusRequest);
    statusRequestDto.srcTxHash = '0xfake';
```

3. Observe that after a failure, polls will follow an exponential
backoff interval (10 sec, 20 sec, etc...)
4. Click on a failed to fetch tx history item (after 7 attempts) to
restart polling. The video below modified the max attempts to 3 for the
sake of a shorter video.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/14a2b293-94f8-475a-88b1-bc4ac4684f27



## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
…17727)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

Updated workflows for creating release PRs to avoid confusion.

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Related issues**

Fixes: https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/INFRA-2772

## **Manual testing steps**

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ x] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ x] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ x] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria
described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing
evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
…#17747)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**
Enable quality gate in smoke e2e pipelines for account listing

We've ran 10 bitrise pipelines to get minum, max, average and delta
results from tests running
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/a0554c31-25d5-4a68-bcbe-7bcb4c107263?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/747045b1-58a6-4986-9b99-982aa915963e?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/6c881b29-1f71-4d60-8a57-c5d2db40c448?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/34ae3782-6624-45dc-9dbc-432a5aaab4b4?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/d3a240c1-31f4-49e2-9d43-ca18c29df034?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/ddf54e8a-17cc-4f38-8d7d-8d4d07caa110?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/6f54ac83-9da5-473e-8edc-2ead1619b167?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/ef411c36-2de0-4e1f-ad41-c409d01c4eac?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/347accd0-47c4-4316-9d2d-de1ea3f81d6e?tab=artifacts
*
https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/c5dc140c-4c09-4087-840c-51f8cfae7426?tab=artifacts

Results:
<img width="1091" height="362" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8bd9ae85-0aa6-4e4b-9221-fdf00adc3cf6"
/>
<img width="1076" height="358" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7712450a-fea9-491e-8d8b-35e7d352850c"
/>


New quality gates thresholds proposed:
## 🏠 Account List Performance Tests

### Test: `render account list efficiently with multiple accounts and
networks`

**Configuration**: Multiple accounts, popular networks, profile syncing
enabled

| Platform    | Total Max Time | Notes               |
| ----------- | -------------- | ------------------- |
| **Android** | 5900ms         | 5.9 seconds maximum |
| **iOS**     | 4000ms         | 4 seconds maximum   |

---

### Test: `handle account list performance with heavy token load`

**Configuration**: Multiple accounts, popular networks, 10 tokens for
stress testing

| Platform    | Total Max Time | Notes               |
| ----------- | -------------- | ------------------- |
| **Android** | 4200ms         | 4.2 seconds maximum |
| **iOS**     | 4200ms         | 4.2 seconds maximum |

---

### Test: `benchmark account list with minimal load`

**Configuration**: Minimal accounts, default network, 2 tokens (baseline
measurement)

| Platform    | Total Max Time | Notes               |
| ----------- | -------------- | ------------------- |
| **Android** | 3800ms         | 3.8 seconds maximum |
| **iOS**     | 3800ms         | 3.8 seconds maximum |

---


Test on purpose failure of the performance regression pipeline testing
(still running):

https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/574f564e-5430-49c1-a6c6-3d10da617740



<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to this page...
2.
3.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

This PR aims to re-use `EditSpendingCapButton` in order to prevent
duplication and use more advanced modal with validations. It doesn't
introduce any functional change - please see before/after recordings.

## **Changelog**


<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

No changelog

## **Related issues**

Fixes: MetaMask/MetaMask-planning#5297

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Have smart account 
2. Try swapping that requires both approval and swap transaction (for
example do a swap from uniswap with a token that you didn't approve
before)
3. You should be able to click whole value component as it's a default
UX

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1dfb5388-1377-42b9-8d1b-77e35df9cd8e



### **After**



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/37b216e4-547b-4d77-b73f-308ea096b6d2




## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [X] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [X] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [X] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [X] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [X] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**
This PR adds the `Maskicon` as a 3rd AvatarAccount type. Additionally,
the border radius is updated to be squared, similar to the AvatarNetwork

https://www.figma.com/design/1D6tnzXqWgnUC3spaAOELN/%F0%9F%A6%8A-MMDS-Components?m=auto&node-id=196-1563&t=v8RkQglW2M8gwYSs-1

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes: #17722

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Spin up Storybook.
2. Go to Avatars > AvatarAccount
3.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/871774c9-e958-430d-8b8f-ec68360ebac3

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e64c48e4-2561-46c7-9ba3-4a22a07671a0

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

The purpose of this PR is to fix a few things relating to triggering the
performance workflow:

1. a step to install the dependencies: `yarn setup`
2. map BROWSERSTACK_APP_URL correctly

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
3. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to this page...
2.
4.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**
Adds an overlay to the app screen when app is in inactive state
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes: [#2208](https://github.com/MetaMask/mobile-planning/issues/2208)

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Run app
2. **Enter App Switcher** - Double tap the Home button (press the square
button on Android)on the simulator or swipe up on device to enter app
switcher
3. App should show overlay
4. Return to app
5. Overlay should be removed
6. **Background the app** - Again Enter App Switcher - Double tap the
Home button (press the square button on Android)on the simulator or
swipe up on device to enter app switcher
7. Press off off the app switcher to enter device Home screen and close
the switcher
8. Open app
9. App should open without overlay
10.  Close and reopen the app
11. Should be no overlay
12. NOTE: overlay should display background color consistent with theme
setting: light || dark

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

#### iOS


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d17af4bf-a325-4b35-9256-ff81a0ff970a

#### Android


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72d499dc-9e6f-445b-bc4d-78dd38d27514



### **After**
#### iOS


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a583a23d-dbe4-4aad-b45f-944bfd027e22

#### Android


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8e3bc3a3-34df-4109-88b4-60db0d33f53d


## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: Cal-L <cleun007@gmail.com>
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

This PR is to add e2e coverage for the multichain import feature

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Related issues**

Fixes:
https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/MMQA-477

## **Manual testing steps**

CI should pass
https://app.bitrise.io/build/6ea01720-c255-4c2d-af78-c148ea1bd04a

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: salimtb <salim.toubal@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…17752)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**
This PR aims to migrate all tests to the new fixture files and removes
the old files.

**Note:** The spec files under quarantine were also migrated but there
will be the need to refactor them to properly use withFixtures.

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to this page...
2.
3.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@pull pull Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2025
@pull pull Bot added the ⤵️ pull label Jul 30, 2025
@pull pull Bot merged commit 2958f51 into Reality2byte:main Jul 30, 2025
1 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants