Skip to content

infra: Scope incremental cascade per parameter set#5086

Merged
rnetser merged 1 commit into
RedHatQE:mainfrom
Anatw:fix_incremental_implementation
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

infra: Scope incremental cascade per parameter set#5086
rnetser merged 1 commit into
RedHatQE:mainfrom
Anatw:fix_incremental_implementation

Conversation

@Anatw

@Anatw Anatw commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What this PR does / why we need it:

When an incremental class is parametrized at class level, a failure in one parameter set (e.g. ipv4) should not cascade into another (e.g. ipv6) since they are independent test cycles with fresh fixtures.
This was discovered while working on PR #5026 — adding @pytest.mark.jira("CNV-88755", run=False) to a single test caused 6 xfails instead of just 2 skips, because _previousfailed is stored on the class node which is shared across all parametrize combinations.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for reviewer:
  • Non-parametrized incremental classes are unaffected — all their tests share the same key so behavior is identical to before.
  • Currently two incremental classes use class-level parametrize:
    • tests/network/l2_bridge/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py
    • tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py
jira-ticket:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved incremental test failure tracking for parametrized tests, so failures are tracked per-parameter set—leading to clearer xfail attribution and more reliable test outcomes.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Refactors pytest incremental failure tracking to store the last failing item per parametrization key (derived from item.callspec.id or "") in parent._previousfailed (a dict) and to retrieve that keyed entry during pytest_runtest_setup for xfail decisions.

Changes

Incremental test failure tracking per parameter identifier

Layer / File(s) Summary
Keyed storage and lookup in pytest hooks
conftest.py
pytest_runtest_makereport now ensures parent._previousfailed is a dict and sets parent._previousfailed[param_key] = item where param_key is item.callspec.id or "". pytest_runtest_setup now retrieves the prior failure with parent._previousfailed.get(param_key) and uses its name when xfail'ing the current test.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Suggested labels

new-tests

Suggested reviewers

  • dshchedr
  • geetikakay
  • vsibirsk
  • RoniKishner
  • rnetser
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: scoping incremental cascade behavior per parameter set in conftest.py.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes all required sections with substantial detail: what/why, special notes, and jira-ticket (marked NONE). Issue field is empty but non-critical.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stp Link Required ✅ Passed No new test files or test functions were added in this PR; only existing code was modified (conftest.py incremental failure-tracking logic and various test/utility files).

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Summary by Qodo

Scope incremental cascade per parameter set

🐞 Bug fix

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Scope incremental cascade per parameter set to prevent cross-contamination
• Store _previousfailed as dictionary keyed by parameter values
• Extract parameter key from test item name using regex pattern
• Prevent failures in one parametrized test from affecting others
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["Parametrized Incremental Test"] -->|Extract param key| B["_get_incremental_param_key"]
  B -->|Return param value| C["Dictionary key"]
  D["Test Failure"] -->|Store with param key| E["_previousfailed dict"]
  E -->|Lookup by param key| F["Independent cascade per param"]
  F -->|No cross-contamination| G["Other param sets unaffected"]

Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. conftest.py 🐞 Bug fix +10/-2

Implement per-parameter incremental test cascade scoping

• Added _get_incremental_param_key() function to extract parameter values from test item names
 using regex
• Changed _previousfailed from single item to dictionary keyed by parameter set
• Updated pytest_runtest_makereport() hook to store failed tests per parameter key
• Updated pytest_runtest_setup() hook to retrieve failures using parameter-specific key

conftest.py


Grey Divider

ⓘ You are approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

Qodo Logo

@qodo-code-review

qodo-code-review Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (2) 📘 Rule violations (2)

Grey Divider


Action required

1. _get_incremental_param_key in conftest 📘 Rule violation ⚙ Maintainability
Description
A new helper function _get_incremental_param_key() was added to conftest.py, which should
contain fixtures only. Keeping helper logic in conftest.py reduces test organization clarity and
violates the project’s fixture-only convention.
Code

conftest.py[R672-675]

Evidence
PR Compliance ID 12 forbids adding helper functions/classes in conftest.py. The PR introduces
_get_incremental_param_key() as a new helper in conftest.py and uses it from hooks, making it
non-fixture helper logic located in a conftest.py file.

AGENTS.md: Conftest Files Are for Fixtures Only (No Helper Functions/Classes in conftest.py or test_*.py)
conftest.py[672-675]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
`conftest.py` should contain fixtures only, but a new helper function `_get_incremental_param_key()` was added.

## Issue Context
This helper is used by `pytest_runtest_makereport` and `pytest_runtest_setup` to scope incremental failure state per parametrized class instance.

## Fix Focus Areas
- conftest.py[672-687]
- conftest.py[742-745]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


2. re.search uses positional args 📘 Rule violation ⚙ Maintainability
Description
The new call re.search(r"\[(.+)\]$", item.name) uses positional arguments for a multi-argument
call. This reduces readability and violates the requirement to use named arguments for
multi-argument calls.
Code

conftest.py[673]

Evidence
PR Compliance ID 8 requires named arguments for calls with more than one argument. The new code
calls re.search() with two positional arguments (pattern, string) instead of keywords.

AGENTS.md: Use Named Arguments for Multi-Argument Calls
conftest.py[673-673]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
`re.search()` is called with multiple positional arguments, but the codebase requires named arguments for multi-argument calls.

## Issue Context
This occurs in the newly added `_get_incremental_param_key()` helper.

## Fix Focus Areas
- conftest.py[673-673]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools



Remediation recommended

3. Brittle param key parsing 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness
Description
_get_incremental_param_key derives the scope key by regex-parsing item.name and falls back to
"" when the name doesn't end with a non-empty [...] suffix. For parametrized items where this
happens (e.g., empty [] ids or altered naming), all parameter sets share the same key and failures
will cascade across independent parameter sets again.
Code

conftest.py[R672-675]

Evidence
The incremental scoping key is extracted from item.name using a regex and defaults to the empty
string, and that key is then used to index _previousfailed; therefore any parametrized item that
doesn't match the regex will collapse into the shared empty key and cross-contaminate parameter
sets.

conftest.py[672-687]
conftest.py[742-746]
tests/network/l2_bridge/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py[40-48]
tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py[40-48]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`_get_incremental_param_key()` parses `item.name` with a regex and returns `""` when it can't extract a bracket suffix. When that fallback happens for parametrized items, `_previousfailed[""]` becomes shared across parameter sets and the incremental cascade isolation is lost.

### Issue Context
The incremental failure state is now stored per key in `parent._previousfailed[...]`, and the same key must be consistently (and uniquely) derived for all items belonging to the same parameter set.

### Fix Focus Areas
- conftest.py[672-675]
- conftest.py[683-687]
- conftest.py[742-745]

### Suggested implementation direction
- Prefer `item.callspec` when present (pytest parametrized `Function` items):
 - Build a stable key from `callspec.params` (e.g., sorted `k=v` pairs) and **do not** rely on `item.name` formatting.
 - If you only want class-level params, filter `callspec.params` to those injected by the class-level parametrize (if available/identifiable in your suite); otherwise using all params is still safer than parsing `item.name`.
- Keep returning `""` only for truly non-parametrized items (no `callspec`).

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools



Advisory comments

4. Unvalidated _previousfailed type 🐞 Bug ☼ Reliability
Description
pytest_runtest_setup assumes _previousfailed is a dict and calls .get() on it, but
pytest_runtest_makereport only checks hasattr() and doesn't enforce the attribute type. If
_previousfailed is ever set to a non-dict value, incremental setup will raise and abort the test
run.
Code

conftest.py[R742-744]

Evidence
The setup hook calls .get() on whatever is stored in _previousfailed, while the report hook only
ensures the attribute exists, not that it is dict-like; this creates a direct type assumption that
would raise at runtime if violated.

conftest.py[683-687]
conftest.py[742-745]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`pytest_runtest_setup()` calls `.get()` on `item.parent._previousfailed` assuming it is a dict. `pytest_runtest_makereport()` initializes `_previousfailed` only when missing, and does not validate its type.

### Issue Context
While current code paths set `_previousfailed` to a dict, this hook code is safer if it normalizes/guards against unexpected values (future refactors, other hooks, or accidental reuse).

### Fix Focus Areas
- conftest.py[683-687]
- conftest.py[742-745]

### Suggested implementation direction
- Replace the `hasattr()` check with a type check:
 - `prev = getattr(parent, "_previousfailed", None)`
 - `if not isinstance(prev, dict): parent._previousfailed = {}`
- In setup, similarly normalize before `.get()` or use `prev = getattr(...); prev.get(...) if isinstance(prev, dict) else None`.

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


Grey Divider

ⓘ You are approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

Qodo Logo

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Report bugs in Issues

Welcome! 🎉

This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features:

🔄 Automatic Actions

  • Reviewer Assignment: Reviewers are automatically assigned based on the OWNERS file in the repository root
  • Size Labeling: PR size labels (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) are automatically applied based on changes
  • Issue Creation: A tracking issue is created for this PR and will be closed when the PR is merged or closed
  • Branch Labeling: Branch-specific labels are applied to track the target branch
  • Auto-verification: Auto-verified users have their PRs automatically marked as verified
  • Labels: Enabled categories: branch, can-be-merged, cherry-pick, has-conflicts, hold, needs-rebase, size, verified, wip

📋 Available Commands

PR Status Management

  • /wip - Mark PR as work in progress (adds WIP: prefix to title)
  • /wip cancel - Remove work in progress status
  • /hold - Block PR merging (approvers only)
  • /hold cancel - Unblock PR merging
  • /verified - Mark PR as verified
  • /verified cancel - Remove verification status
  • /reprocess - Trigger complete PR workflow reprocessing (useful if webhook failed or configuration changed)
  • /regenerate-welcome - Regenerate this welcome message

Review & Approval

  • /lgtm - Approve changes (looks good to me)
  • /approve - Approve PR (approvers only)
  • /assign-reviewers - Assign reviewers based on OWNERS file
  • /assign-reviewer @username - Assign specific reviewer
  • /check-can-merge - Check if PR meets merge requirements

Testing & Validation

  • /retest tox - Run Python test suite with tox
  • /retest build-container - Rebuild and test container image
  • /retest verify-bugs-are-open - verify-bugs-are-open
  • /retest all - Run all available tests

Container Operations

  • /build-and-push-container - Build and push container image (tagged with PR number)
    • Supports additional build arguments: /build-and-push-container --build-arg KEY=value

Cherry-pick Operations

  • /cherry-pick <branch> - Schedule cherry-pick to target branch when PR is merged
    • Multiple branches: /cherry-pick branch1 branch2 branch3

Label Management

  • /<label-name> - Add a label to the PR
  • /<label-name> cancel - Remove a label from the PR

✅ Merge Requirements

This PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:

  1. Approval: /approve from at least one approver
  2. LGTM Count: Minimum 2 /lgtm from reviewers
  3. Status Checks: All required status checks must pass
  4. No Blockers: No wip, hold, has-conflicts labels and PR must be mergeable (no conflicts)
  5. Verified: PR must be marked as verified

📊 Review Process

Approvers and Reviewers

Approvers:

  • dshchedr
  • myakove
  • rnetser
  • vsibirsk

Reviewers:

  • RoniKishner
  • dshchedr
  • rnetser
  • vsibirsk
Available Labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm
  • approve
AI Features
  • Cherry-Pick Conflict Resolution: Enabled (claude/claude-opus-4-6[1m])

💡 Tips

  • WIP Status: Use /wip when your PR is not ready for review
  • Verification: The verified label is removed on new commits unless the push is detected as a clean rebase
  • Cherry-picking: Cherry-pick labels are processed when the PR is merged
  • Container Builds: Container images are automatically tagged with the PR number
  • Permission Levels: Some commands require approver permissions
  • Auto-verified Users: Certain users have automatic verification and merge privileges

For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers.

Comment thread conftest.py Outdated
Comment thread conftest.py Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot previously approved these changes Jun 1, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.66%. Comparing base (a2dc143) to head (36ca1ec).
⚠️ Report is 74 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5086      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.67%   98.66%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        2487     2463      -24     
==========================================
- Hits         2454     2430      -24     
  Misses         33       33              
Flag Coverage Δ
utilities 98.66% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Anatw

Anatw commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-5086 published

@Anatw

Anatw commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified

Verified locally on bm03-tlv2
Openshift version: 4.22.0-rc.2
CNV version: 4.22.0
HCO image: brew.registry.redhat.io/rh-osbs/iib:1141649
Tested this PR on top of the l2_bride stuntime PR (#5026) - this issue was covered during the verification of this PR.

Without this PR fix:
= 4 passed, 2 skipped, 1 deselected, 6 xfailed, 29 warnings in 1307.94s (0:21:47) =

With the current PRs fix:
...
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_client_migrates_to_server_node[ipv4] STATUS: PASSED <- last test passing
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_server_migrates_off_client_node[ipv4] STATUS: FAILED
<- failed test
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_server_migrates_between_non_client_nodes[ipv4] STATUS: XFAILED
<- expected failure since the class is marked as incremental
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_server_migrates_to_client_node[ipv4] STATUS: XFAILED <- ditto
Second IP family (through parametrization) is not affected:
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_client_migrates_off_server_node[ipv6] STATUS: PASSED
...
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_server_migrates_between_non_client_nodes[ipv6] STATUS: FAILED
<- scenario failed
TEST: TestMigrationStuntime.test_server_migrates_to_client_node[ipv6] STATUS: XFAILED <- expected xfail
==== 2 failed, 7 passed, 1 deselected, 3 xfailed, 90 warnings in 1269.54s (0:21:09) ====

Test regression - class mark as incremental with no parametrization has no issues:
Incremental without class parametrization:
openshift-virtualization-tests-runner/5493
PYTEST_PARAMS: -s -o log_cli=true -m tier2 --jira --cluster-sanity-skip-storage-check tests/network/macspoof/test_macspoof.py
==== 2 passed, 1 deselected, 3 warnings in 1022.32s (0:17:02) ====

Incremental with class parametrization:
openshift-virtualization-tests-runner/5489
PYTEST_PARAMS: -s -o log_cli=true -m tier3 --jira --cluster-sanity-skip-storage-check tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py
==== 12 passed, 1 deselected, 85 warnings in 1793.76s (0:29:53) ====

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai

Test execution plan request details

CRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file.
The inline comment should contain the full Test Execution Plan (smoke decision, gating decision, and specific affected tests).
Do NOT submit a formal review - just post the inline comment directly.

As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan.
You will post an inline review comment with the test execution plan on the first changed file.
If you fail to run or post a comment, retry.

Analysis Requirements:

  1. Examine code changes in each modified file

  2. Identify affected code paths, functions, and classes

  3. Analyze pytest-specific elements: fixtures (scope, dependencies), parametrization, markers, conftest changes

  4. Trace test dependencies through imports, shared utilities, fixture inheritance, fixture teardown, and yield from cleanup in conftest

  5. Detect new tests introduced in the PR

  6. Utilities and libs impact (when utilities/ or libs/ changes):
    You MUST use shell scripts (rg, git diff) to trace the full impact.
    Follow these sub-steps in order:

    6a. Identify modified symbols: For each changed file under utilities/ or libs/,
    list every modified function or method.
    Example: git diff HEAD~1 --unified=0 -- utilities/hco.py | grep '^[+-]def '

    6b. Find direct callers: Search tests and conftest for each symbol from 6a.
    Example: rg -l 'get_hco_version' tests/

    6c. Trace fixture teardown and cleanup: Find fixtures that reach
    the modified symbol through yield from or context-manager wrappers.
    Example: rg -l 'yield from.*enable_common_boot|def.*enable_common_boot' tests/

    6d. Trace same-file callers: In each changed file, find other functions
    whose body calls a modified symbol (including code after yield
    in @contextmanager helpers).
    Example: rg 'get_hco_version|enable_common_boot' utilities/hco.py

    6e. Expand transitively: If function A calls modified B, then
    tests/fixtures that call A are affected — even when the test body
    never imports B directly.

    Do NOT limit impact to tests that import the modified symbol only.

  7. Smoke test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with smoke-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.smoke' tests/
    VERIFY the above command returned actual file paths before concluding False.
    Set True if either condition is met:

    • a smoke-marked file appears in the affected set from 6b-6e, OR
    • any conftest.py in the smoke test's parent-directory hierarchy (up to repo root)
      imports or calls a modified utilities/libs symbol — including autouse fixtures
      that depend on modified functions. ALL tests in that directory and below are affected.
      Example check: for each smoke_file, scan dirname(smoke_file)/conftest.py,
      dirname(dirname(smoke_file))/conftest.py, etc. for modified symbol imports
      and autouse fixtures that depend on modified symbols.
  8. Gating test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with gating-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.gating' tests/
    Set True if a gating-marked file also appears in the affected set from 6b-6e.
    Utilities/libs changes often affect gating tests without affecting smoke tests.
    Do NOT stop analysis after concluding Run smoke tests: False.

Output rules:
Do NOT include analysis step numbers (1-8) in your visible output.

Your deliverable:
Your change request comment will be based on the following requirements:

Test Execution Plan

  • Run smoke tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path (test → fixture → changed symbol). True ONLY with a verified path.
  • Run gating tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path. True if any gating-marked test is in the affected set.
  • Affected tests to run (required when utilities/, libs/, or shared conftest changes — list concrete paths even when smoke is False)
  • path/to/test_file.py - When the entire test file needs verification
  • path/to/test_file.py::TestClass::test_method - When specific test(s) needed
  • path/to/test_file.py::test_function - When specific test(s) needed
  • -m marker - When a marker covers multiple affected tests (e.g. -m gating only if ALL gating tests in scope need run)
  • Tag each listed test or group with its marker when not obvious, e.g. (gating) or (smoke)

Guidelines:

  • Include tests affected directly OR via fixture setup/teardown, yield from cleanup, or transitive utility call chains (caller calls modified helper)
  • Use a full file path only if ALL tests in that file require verification
  • Use file path + test name when only specific tests use an affected fixture or utility wrapper (preferred for partial file impact)
  • If a test marker can cover multiple files/tests, provide the marker
  • Balance coverage vs over-testing - Keep descriptions minimal
  • Example: if leaf helper foo() changes, include tests whose fixture teardown calls wrapper bar() where bar() calls foo(), even when the test body only imports an unrelated symbol from the same utilities module

Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK):

When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:

  • Collection Safety: Fixtures MUST have existence checks (return None when hardware unavailable)
  • Test Plan: MUST verify both WITH and WITHOUT hardware:
    • Run affected tests on cluster WITH hardware
    • Verify collection succeeds on cluster WITHOUT hardware

CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES:

When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:

  1. YOUR ONLY DELIVERABLE: Post an inline review comment containing the test execution plan on the first changed line
  2. THEN STOP IMMEDIATELY - Do NOT generate any additional response
  3. FALLBACK ONLY: If submitting the review fails after retrying, post as a regular PR comment
  4. SILENCE = SUCCESS: After successfully submitting the review, your task is complete. No confirmation needed.

ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):

  • ❌ Do NOT post acknowledgment messages like "Test execution plan posted", "Review posted successfully", "I've successfully posted"
  • ❌ Do NOT mention review IDs, URLs, or confirmation of posting in the PR thread
  • ❌ Do NOT add any follow-up comments after submitting the review
  • ❌ Do NOT reply to confirm task completion
  • ❌ Do NOT explain what you did - just do it and stop

Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise.

CRITICAL — Verification rules for smoke and gating decisions:
- For each True decision, you must have traced a concrete path: test file → fixture → utility function → modified symbol.
- Do NOT assume impact based on scope, file proximity, or infrastructure-sounding names.
Only set True when you trace a concrete path through steps 6a-6e, then 7 or 8.
WRONG: "utilities/hco.py changed → run smoke" (no traced dependency path)
WRONG: "Run smoke tests: False" with no affected-test list when gating tests use the changed utility
RIGHT: "Run smoke tests: False, Run gating tests: True" plus tests/.../test_foo.py::TestBar::test_baz (gating)
RIGHT: "Smoke test X uses fixture Y → wrapper Z → changed function W in utilities/hco.py"

Comment thread conftest.py
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

PR=5086
REPO="RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests"

echo "## PR metadata"
gh pr view "$PR" --repo "$REPO" --json headRefOid,baseRefOid,files | jq -r '.'

echo "## PR diff"
gh pr diff "$PR" --repo "$REPO" --patch > /tmp/pr5086.patch
cat /tmp/pr5086.patch

echo "## first changed line in first file"
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
patch = Path('/tmp/pr5086.patch').read_text()
current_file = None
for line in patch.splitlines():
    if line.startswith('diff --git '):
        current_file = line.split(' b/', 1)[-1]
    if line.startswith('@@') and current_file:
        plus = line.split(' +', 1)[1].split(' ', 1)[0]
        start = int(plus.split(',')[0])
        print(f"file={current_file} line={start}")
        break
PY

echo "## smoke marker files"
rg -l '`@pytest`\.mark\.smoke' tests/ || true

echo "## gating marker files"
rg -l '`@pytest`\.mark\.gating' tests/ || true

Length of output: 6371


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

PR=5086
REPO="RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests"
COMMIT_ID="0fa215343a44fd51739f051301611352e7e69168"
PATH_IN_PR="conftest.py"
LINE=676

BODY="**Test Execution Plan**

- **Run smoke tests: False** — Smoke-marked files (tests/virt/node/general/test_container_disk_vm.py, etc.) do not use \`pytest.mark.incremental\`; the modified hooks in \`pytest_runtest_makereport\` / \`pytest_runtest_setup\` only alter behavior for incremental-marked tests, so no smoke test traces to the changed code path.
- **Run gating tests: False** — Gating-marked files do not use \`pytest.mark.incremental\`; same reasoning as above.

**Affected tests to run**

- \`tests/network/l2_bridge/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py\` \`(tier3, incremental, parametrized ipv4/ipv6)\` — primary target: validates that \`pytest_runtest_makereport\`\`item.callspec.id\` key scoping prevents ipv4 failure cascading into ipv6.
- \`tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py\` \`(tier3, incremental, parametrized ipv4/ipv6)\` — same parametrized incremental cascade path for localnet.
- \`tests/network/macspoof/test_macspoof.py\` \`(tier2, incremental, non-parametrized)\` — regression check: non-parametrized incremental classes fall back to \`param_key=\"\"\` and must preserve prior cascade behavior unchanged.

No hardware-specific fixture changes detected; no SR-IOV/GPU/DPDK split required."

payload_file="$(mktemp)"
jq -n \
  --arg body "$BODY" \
  --arg commit_id "$COMMIT_ID" \
  --arg path "$PATH_IN_PR" \
  --argjson line "$LINE" \
  '{body:$body, commit_id:$commit_id, path:$path, side:"RIGHT", line:$line}' > "$payload_file"

gh api \
  --method POST \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  "/repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments" \
  --input "$payload_file" | jq -r '{id, path, line, html_url}'

Length of output: 2071




🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4772
File: tests/network/l2_bridge/rhel9_rhel10_cluster/test_connectivity.py:31-37
Timestamp: 2026-05-08T06:44:12.879Z
Learning: In tests/network/l2_bridge/rhel9_rhel10_cluster/test_connectivity.py and tests/network/localnet/rhel9_rhel10_cluster/test_connectivity.py (dual-stream RHCOS 9/10 migration tests), the incremental/state-coupled test design is intentional and agreed upon in the STD (https://github.com/RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs/blob/main/stps/sig-virt/dual-stream-cluster-rhcos9-rhcos10/network.md). Tests are ordered (RHCOS 9 → RHCOS 10 → RHCOS 9) using pytest.mark.incremental, and test_*_to_rhcos9 intentionally relies on the VM already being on RHCOS 10 from the previous test. Do not flag this as a state-coupling issue or suggest making these tests independently runnable.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-05-29T11:02:22.804Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests repository, version-bump PRs that update the main branch to reference a new CNV release (e.g., "Update project `main` to reference cnv 5.0") do NOT add new test files or test modules. These PRs only update metadata (pyproject.toml, tox.ini, .coderabbit.yaml) and clean up resolved Jira fixtures/markers in existing files. The "Stp Link Required" pre-merge check may incorrectly flag hundreds of "newly added" test files as a false positive due to the base-branch comparison shifting after branching — this should be ignored for such PRs.

Learnt from: Anatw
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4833
File: tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py:45-49
Timestamp: 2026-05-12T18:19:39.780Z
Learning: In `tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py` (and similar stuntime/migration state-machine test classes under `tests/network/localnet/`), the six tests inside `MigrationStuntimeBase` and its subclasses (`TestMigrationStuntimeIPv4`, `TestMigrationStuntimeIPv6`) are intentionally stateful and ordered. Each live migration leaves the shared VM pair (client + server) in the precise placement required as the precondition for the next test. This is by design per the STP-defined sequence; making tests independent would require extra unmeasured migrations, adding significant runtime with no benefit. `pytest.mark.incremental` is used to skip remaining tests after a failure (broken state machine). Do NOT flag this incremental coupling as a test-isolation violation; instead, treat it as an accepted and intentional state-machine pattern for migration stuntime measurement tests in this repository.

Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 5039
File: tests/network/l2_bridge/nad_ref_change/lib_helpers.py:1-1
Timestamp: 2026-06-02T21:16:58.118Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, when a PR only relocates functions to shared libraries and updates import paths in test files (no logic change), do NOT flag the callers as requiring full test re-execution. At most, run `pytest --collect-only` to verify the new import paths resolve correctly. Only require full re-execution of caller tests when the moved function's implementation changes behavior.

Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4962
File: tests/network/l2_bridge/nad_ref_change/test_nad_ref_change.py:89-95
Timestamp: 2026-05-21T13:52:58.266Z
Learning: In the `tests/network/l2_bridge/nad_ref_change/test_nad_ref_change.py` `TestRunningVMLinuxBridgeVlanChange` class (marked `pytest.mark.incremental`), the test `test_vm_state_iface_info_preserved` is intentionally scoped only to verifying VM interface metadata invariance (MAC, name, IPs) after a NAD reference live-update. It does NOT assert that the NAD reference field itself changed in the VM spec, because functional correctness of the NAD switch (i.e., that traffic actually moved to the new VLAN) is validated by the subsequent `test_connectivity` / `test_two_networks` tests. Do not flag missing spec-level assertions inside `test_vm_state_iface_info_preserved`.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T19:05:24.987Z
Learning: For PR `#1904` test execution, the critical validation point is test_connectivity_over_migration_between_localnet_vms which should fail gracefully on cloud clusters but pass on bare-metal/PSI clusters, representing the core nmstate conditional logic functionality.

Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4147
File: tests/network/upgrade/test_upgrade_network.py:166-177
Timestamp: 2026-03-19T10:37:02.008Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, unused fixture parameters in test methods (e.g., `bridge_on_one_node` in `tests/network/upgrade/test_upgrade_network.py`) that exist purely for pytest dependency ordering should not be flagged for removal, and no follow-up issues need to be opened for them. This is an intentional pattern, consistent with the analogous convention for fixture definitions in this codebase.

Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4962
File: tests/network/l2_bridge/nad_ref_change/test_nad_ref_change.py:86-95
Timestamp: 2026-05-27T09:21:14.771Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, when testing NAD live-update behavior in tests/network/l2_bridge/nad_ref_change/, asserting full equality on `lookup_iface_status` results before and after `update_nad_references` is intentional. The test intent is that NO interface field (MAC, name, IPs, or any other) should change as a result of the live NAD reference swap. Do not suggest narrowing the assertion to a subset of fields; full equality is the desired behavior and will correctly fail if the live update causes any unexpected interface metadata change.

Learnt from: EdDev
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-04-30T13:42:43.892Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when processing test execution plan requests for PRs that introduce NEW test classes or test files (not just modifications to existing tests), always verify STD-first workflow compliance as part of the analysis: (1) check if the new test class has actual implementation code (assertions, test logic) — if so, it needs a prior STD PR, (2) check if the test file has a module docstring with STP or Jira/RFE link, (3) check if `What this PR does / why we need it:` in the PR description has meaningful content. Flag any violation even when the bot's primary request is only for a test execution plan. These checks should be appended to the test execution plan inline comment.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-04-03T18:43:06.192Z
Learning: In `scripts/tests_analyzer/pytest_marker_analyzer.py` in the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, `conftest_resolved=True` is an intentional trade-off: once a conftest pathway is resolved, it stops scanning further dependency paths (including non-conftest ones). Removing this flag causes 21 false positive regressions on 150 PRs (measured). The false negative risk — a 2+ level transitive chain through both conftest and non-conftest paths — is considered theoretical. Do not flag `conftest_resolved=True` as hiding non-conftest dependency paths; this behavior is deliberate and empirically validated.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T10:28:54.212Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when determining smoke test impact for test execution plans, only set "Run smoke tests: True" if there is a verified, traceable dependency path from smoke tests to the changed code. Session-scoped fixtures or infrastructure-sounding changes do NOT automatically imply smoke test impact - the dependency chain must be explicitly verified using shell scripts before recommending smoke test execution.

Learnt from: jpeimer
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T15:56:00.157Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when responding to test execution plan requests from openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3, do NOT use "REQUEST_CHANGES" review type if the PR author has already marked the PR as verified (e.g., with `/verified` command). Test execution plans are informational guides, not blocking requirements. Use COMMENT event for informational test plans, or only REQUEST_CHANGES if there are actual code issues that need to be addressed before merging.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T14:00:59.076Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when responding to test execution plan requests from openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3, CodeRabbit must post ONLY an inline review comment on the Files Changed tab and then stop immediately without generating any follow-up comments in the PR discussion thread. No acknowledgment messages, no confirmation of posting, no explanation - silence after posting the inline review equals success. Additional comments create empty/meaningless reviews that clutter the PR.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3062
File: conftest.py:333-333
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T20:11:03.645Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when determining smoke test impact for changes affecting py_config["os_login_param"], follow this verification methodology: (1) Find all smoke tests: `rg "pytest.mark.smoke" --type=py -B2 | grep "def test_"`, (2) For each smoke test file, search for VM creation patterns: `rg "VirtualMachineForTests|running_vm|VirtualMachineForTestsFromTemplate|wait_for_ssh|check_ssh_connectivity"`, (3) Trace the dependency chain: smoke test → VirtualMachineForTests/running_vm() → wait_for_ssh_connectivity() (default enabled) → vm.login_params property → py_config["os_login_param"][vm.os_flavor], (4) Check utilities/virt.py for login_params usage: `rg "os_login_param|login_params" utilities/virt.py -C3`. Any smoke test creating VMs with default SSH connectivity checks (running_vm with check_ssh_connectivity=True) depends on os_login_param, even if the test doesn't directly reference it.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T19:05:24.987Z
Learning: The test execution plan for PR `#1904` focuses on cluster-type conditional logic where nmstate functionality is bypassed on cloud clusters (Azure/AWS) but fully functional on bare-metal/PSI clusters, requiring different test strategies for each environment type.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3062
File: conftest.py:333-333
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T15:09:49.597Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when conftest.py or utilities/bitwarden.py changes affect py_config["os_login_param"], smoke test impact must be determined by: (1) finding all smoke tests using `rg "pytest.mark.smoke"`, (2) checking each for VM creation patterns (VirtualMachineForTests, running_vm, VirtualMachineForTestsFromTemplate), (3) tracing whether running_vm is called with default check_ssh_connectivity=True, which accesses vm.login_params property that reads py_config["os_login_param"][vm.os_flavor]. The dependency chain is: smoke test → VM creation → running_vm → wait_for_ssh_connectivity → vm.login_params → os_login_param. Any smoke test creating VMs with SSH connectivity (the default) depends on os_login_param.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T14:06:22.391Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when posting test execution plan inline review comments using GitHub API, the full test execution plan content must go in the `comments[].body` field (which appears on Files Changed tab), NOT in the top-level `body` field (which appears in PR discussion thread). The top-level `body` field should be omitted or left empty to avoid posting redundant comments in the PR discussion thread.

Learnt from: CR
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-05-18T15:22:26.757Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/test_*.py : New feature tests must follow the STD-first workflow: (1) STP (Software Test Plan) reviewed and approved, (2) STD (Software Test Description) placeholder tests with docstrings and `__test__ = False` reviewed, (3) Implementation only after STD review. Never submit test implementation without prior STD review.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4328
File: tests/network/flat_overlay/test_multi_network_policy.py:32-32
Timestamp: 2026-04-14T16:15:36.741Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when reviewing any PR with "Quarantine" in the title or a `quarantine` label, always verify compliance with docs/QUARANTINE_GUIDELINES.md:
- Category 1 (Product Bug): must use `pytest.mark.jira("CNV-XXXXX", run=False)` — the `pytest_jira` plugin conditionally skips the test when the Jira issue is open. Do NOT suggest replacing this with `xfail`.
- Category 2 (Automation Issue): must use `pytest.mark.xfail(run=False, reason=...)` — pytest itself handles the skip.
Flag any quarantine PR that uses the wrong category marker, is missing a Jira ticket reference, or uses `run=False` in the wrong context. Raising these compliance questions is always appropriate for quarantine PRs, even if the final resolution confirms the marker is correct.

Learnt from: dshchedr
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4118
File: utilities/database.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-17T01:32:13.674Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, maintainer dshchedr prefers CodeRabbit to post targeted inline comments on the Files changed tab for each applicable location rather than aggregating multiple issues into a single discussion thread.

Learnt from: dshchedr
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4118
File: utilities/database.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-17T01:32:13.674Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, maintainer dshchedr prefers CodeRabbit to post targeted inline comments on the Files Changed tab at each applicable location rather than aggregating multiple issues into a single PR discussion thread reply.

Learnt from: servolkov
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1776
File: libs/net/node_network.py:25-31
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T23:43:28.117Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests project, servolkov's team always uses bare metal (BM) clusters with IPv4 setup in their testing environment, making defensive checks for IPv4 data presence potentially redundant in their networking code.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3371
File: scripts/tests_analyzer/compare_coderabbit_decisions.py:199-289
Timestamp: 2026-01-13T10:06:14.822Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user rnetser prefers to keep pagination loops inline rather than extracting them into generic helper functions when the loops have different URL patterns and unique post-processing logic, as the inline approach improves readability and makes each endpoint's behavior more explicit.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3228
File: .coderabbit.yaml:30-41
Timestamp: 2026-01-05T10:33:55.037Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user rnetser prefers minimal pre-merge checks in CodeRabbit configuration: only docstrings enforcement (80% threshold) is needed, not title or description checks.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 2469
File: utilities/sanity.py:139-142
Timestamp: 2025-11-08T07:36:57.616Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user rnetser prefers to keep refactoring PRs (like PR `#2469`) strictly focused on moving/organizing code into more granular modules without adding new functionality, error handling, or behavioral changes. Such improvements should be handled in separate PRs.

Learnt from: jpeimer
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1160
File: tests/storage/storage_migration/test_mtc_storage_class_migration.py:165-176
Timestamp: 2025-06-17T07:45:37.776Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user jpeimer prefers explicit fixture parameters over composite fixtures in test methods, even when there are many parameters, as they find this approach more readable and maintainable for understanding test dependencies.

Learnt from: jpeimer
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3571
File: tests/storage/storage_migration/utils.py:158-167
Timestamp: 2026-01-25T13:18:26.819Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user jpeimer prefers to avoid nitpicky style changes (e.g., removing `.keys()` from dict membership checks) because verifying every change is expensive. Be cautious about suggesting low-impact stylistic improvements that require verification overhead.

Learnt from: akri3i
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1210
File: tests/virt/cluster/general/mass_machine_type_transition_tests/conftest.py:24-64
Timestamp: 2025-06-23T19:28:20.281Z
Learning: In OpenShift Virtualization mass machine type transition tests, the machine type glob pattern "pc-q35-rhel8.*.*" is intentionally hard-coded in the kubevirt_api_lifecycle_automation_job as it's used only once for this specific test case, with plans to update it in the future if the job needs to support other machine types.

Learnt from: RoniKishner
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1411
File: utilities/os_utils.py:246-279
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T17:13:59.166Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests repository, CentOS preferences follow the format "centos-stream<version>" (e.g., "centos-stream9", "centos-stream10"). The generate_instance_type_centos_os_matrix function correctly uses regex to extract numeric versions and constructs the latest version string in the same format as the input preferences for proper comparison.

@rnetser rnetser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@Anatw

Anatw commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/check-can-merge

1 similar comment
@Anatw

Anatw commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/check-can-merge

@geetikakay

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@rnetser rnetser merged commit 6fb2ca2 into RedHatQE:main Jun 4, 2026
22 checks passed
OhadRevah pushed a commit to OhadRevah/openshift-virtualization-tests that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
##### What this PR does / why we need it:
When an incremental class is parametrized at class level, a failure in
one parameter set (e.g. ipv4) should not cascade into another (e.g.
ipv6) since they are independent test cycles with fresh fixtures.
This was discovered while working on PR RedHatQE#5026 — adding
`@pytest.mark.jira("CNV-88755", run=False)` to a single test caused 6
xfails instead of just 2 skips, because `_previousfailed` is stored on
the class node which is shared across all parametrize combinations.

##### Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

##### Special notes for reviewer:
- Non-parametrized incremental classes are unaffected — all their tests
share the same key so behavior is identical to before.
 - Currently two incremental classes use class-level parametrize:
-
`tests/network/l2_bridge/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py`
- `tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py`

##### jira-ticket:



<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Improved incremental test failure tracking for parametrized tests, so
failures are tracked per-parameter set—leading to clearer xfail
attribution and more reliable test outcomes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Signed-off-by: Anat Wax <awax@redhat.com>
rnetser pushed a commit to rnetser/openshift-virtualization-tests that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
##### What this PR does / why we need it:
When an incremental class is parametrized at class level, a failure in
one parameter set (e.g. ipv4) should not cascade into another (e.g.
ipv6) since they are independent test cycles with fresh fixtures.
This was discovered while working on PR RedHatQE#5026 — adding
`@pytest.mark.jira("CNV-88755", run=False)` to a single test caused 6
xfails instead of just 2 skips, because `_previousfailed` is stored on
the class node which is shared across all parametrize combinations.

##### Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

##### Special notes for reviewer:
- Non-parametrized incremental classes are unaffected — all their tests
share the same key so behavior is identical to before.
 - Currently two incremental classes use class-level parametrize:
-
`tests/network/l2_bridge/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py`
- `tests/network/localnet/migration_stuntime/test_migration_stuntime.py`

##### jira-ticket:



<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Improved incremental test failure tracking for parametrized tests, so
failures are tracked per-parameter set—leading to clearer xfail
attribution and more reliable test outcomes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Signed-off-by: Anat Wax <awax@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants