feat: implement scorecard-classic command

[AlbinaBlazhko17]

What/Why/How?

• Added new command scorecard-classic.
• Implemented functionality to fetch scorecard and plugins from project url.
• Implemented functionality to pass project url in arguments.
• Implemented functionality to use API key to fetch data.
• Implemented functionality to be able to output the result in JSON and stylish formats.
• Implemented functionality to check if command run in CI and throw error if API key is missing.
• Implemented functionality to check api level.
• Added verbose logs.
• Added tests.

Reference

Related: https://github.com/Redocly/redocly/issues/8775

Testing

Ran tests.

Screenshots (optional)

Check yourself

• Code changed? - Tested with Redoc/Realm/Reunite (internal)
• All new/updated code is covered by tests
• New package installed? - Tested in different environments (browser/node)
• Documentation update considered

Security

• The security impact of the change has been considered
• Code follows company security practices and guidelines

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c182102

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages

Name	Type
@redocly/cli	Patch
@redocly/openapi-core	Patch
@redocly/respect-core	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
redocly lint resources/rebilly.yaml	1.437 ± 0.058	1.379	1.588	1.00 ± 0.05
redocly-next lint resources/rebilly.yaml	1.435 ± 0.030	1.395	1.485	1.00

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

Status	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔵	Lines	78.59% (🎯 78%)	6104 / 7766
🔵	Statements	78.08% (🎯 78%)	6308 / 8078
🔵	Functions	82.11% (🎯 81%)	1249 / 1521
🔵	Branches	70.57% (🎯 70%)	4200 / 5951

File Coverage

File	Stmts	Branches	Functions	Lines	Uncovered Lines
Changed Files
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/index.ts	0%	0%	0%	0%	21-129
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/auth/login-handler.ts	100%	88.88%	100%	100%
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/formatters/json-formatter.ts	96.77%	86.66%	100%	96.55%	36
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/formatters/stylish-formatter.ts	100%	88.46%	100%	100%
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/remote/fetch-scorecard.ts	80.3%	75.92%	100%	80.3%	58-61, 71-74, 128-129, 161, 168-171
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/validation/plugin-evaluator.ts	83.33%	73.68%	100%	82.75%	17, 59-62
packages/cli/src/commands/scorecard-classic/validation/validate-scorecard.ts	97.22%	88.88%	100%	97.05%	38-40

Generated in workflow #8164 for commit c182102 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

[DmitryAnansky]

Just an open question.
So are we going to ignore local config in case when scorecards defined?

[AlbinaBlazhko17]

Yeah, i think, @tatomyr can suggest.

[tatomyr]

yes, if scorecard is defined -- use it instead of the local config (for scorecards).

[tatomyr]

Cannot we just re-use the login handler if the user is not authenticated?

[AlbinaBlazhko17]

No, we cannot, because login handler doesn't check if we already store the credentials and they are exist.