feat: add excludedPaths option to no-http-verbs-in-paths rule

[tmchow]

What/Why/How?

Adds an excludedPaths option to the no-http-verbs-in-paths rule. Some paths contain HTTP verb substrings that are false positives (e.g. /foo/profile-options/). This lets users exclude specific paths from evaluation without polluting the ignore file.

Config:

rules:
  no-http-verbs-in-paths:
    severity: error
    splitIntoWords: true
    excludedPaths:
      - /foo/profile-options/

The implementation adds one line to the rule: an early return when the path matches any entry in excludedPaths. Matching is exact (full path string comparison).

Reference

Fixes #1501

Testing

Added a test that verifies /path/post is excluded while /get/path is still reported.

Check yourself

• This PR follows the contributing guide
• All new/updated code is covered by tests
• Core code changed? - Tested with other Redocly products (internal contributions only)
• New package installed? - Tested in different environments (browser/node)
• Documentation update has been considered

Security

• The security impact of the change has been considered

This contribution was developed with AI assistance (Codex).

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 7eddc40

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages

Name	Type
@redocly/openapi-core	Minor
@redocly/cli	Minor
@redocly/respect-core	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[Daryna-del]

Hi @tmchow! Thanks for the contribution!
Could you please also update the documentation to include the new configuration option?

[tatomyr]

Suggested change

	| excludedPaths | [string] | List of paths to exclude from the check. Use exact path strings (e.g. `/gettoken`). Default **[]**. |
	| excludedPaths | [string] | List of paths to exclude from the check. Use exact path strings (e.g. `/token`). Default **[]**. |

Using verbs in path is generally discouraged, please use nouns in examples.

[tatomyr]

Same here.

[tatomyr]

And here.

[tmchow]

Applied the suggested changes -- replaced verb-containing paths with nouns in the docs examples and test, and ran npm run format to fix formatting.

[tatomyr]

@tmchow, I misread the rule 🙈. The rule itself is to detect the wrong naming patterns, so your examples were absolutely correct. Apologies for misleading you. Will you revert the examples back, or shall I merge it as it is and do that myself?

[tmchow]

@tmchow, I misread the rule 🙈. The rule itself is to detect the wrong naming patterns, so your examples were absolutely correct. Apologies for misleading you. Will you revert the examples back, or shall I merge it as it is and do that myself?

do you mind doing it? :)

[Daryna-del]

@tmchow, I misread the rule 🙈. The rule itself is to detect the wrong naming patterns, so your examples were absolutely correct. Apologies for misleading you. Will you revert the examples back, or shall I merge it as it is and do that myself?

do you mind doing it? :)

Sure, we’ll take care of it 🙂

[Daryna-del]

Hi @tmchow! Thanks again for your contribution!
Your changes have been released in @redocly/cli@2.26.0