Skip to content

feat(core): add asyncapi-operation-security-defined lint rule#2759

Open
harshit078 wants to merge 20 commits intoRedocly:mainfrom
harshit078:add-asyncapi-rule
Open

feat(core): add asyncapi-operation-security-defined lint rule#2759
harshit078 wants to merge 20 commits intoRedocly:mainfrom
harshit078:add-asyncapi-rule

Conversation

@harshit078
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@harshit078 harshit078 commented Apr 21, 2026

What/Why/How?

  • Added asyncapi-operation-security-defined rule for AsyncAPI 2.x which reports when a security scheme referenced from an operation or server security array is not defined in ``components.securitySchemes.

Reference

#2667

Testing

Screenshots (optional)

Check yourself

  • This PR follows the contributing guide
  • All new/updated code is covered by tests
  • Core code changed? - Tested with other Redocly products (internal contributions only)
  • New package installed? - Tested in different environments (browser/node)
  • Documentation update has been considered

Security

  • The security impact of the change has been considered
  • Code follows company security practices and guidelines

Note

Medium Risk
Adds a new built-in AsyncAPI rule and enables it by default in the recommended/all configs, which can introduce new lint failures for existing AsyncAPI specs when upgrading.

Overview
Adds a new built-in AsyncAPI 2.x rule (security-defined) that reports operations/servers referencing security schemes not present in components.securitySchemes, with new unit tests covering missing and valid references.

Updates default rulesets/config resolution outputs to include the rule (off/warn/error depending on spec/minimal/recommended), and extends the docs/sidebars and ruleset templates to document and surface the new AsyncAPI security validation rule.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c970602. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c970602

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Name Type
@redocly/openapi-core Minor
@redocly/cli Minor
@redocly/respect-core Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@harshit078 harshit078 changed the title feat: Add asyncapi-operation-security-defined lint rule feat(core): Add asyncapi-operation-security-defined lint rule Apr 24, 2026
@harshit078 harshit078 marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2026 07:51
@harshit078 harshit078 requested review from a team as code owners April 24, 2026 07:51
@harshit078 harshit078 changed the title feat(core): Add asyncapi-operation-security-defined lint rule feat(core): add asyncapi-operation-security-defined lint rule Apr 24, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vadyvas vadyvas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest a slightly different approach:

  1. keep the AsyncAPI logic separate and do not reuse shared logic from the OAS rule
  2. use the same rule name, security-defined, for AsyncAPI as well, and register the AsyncAPI implementation in the AsyncAPI ruleset
  3. do not update the v1 docs in this PR

I think this would make the change smaller, clearer, and safer.

Thank you for the contribution, overall the PR looks good

Comment thread packages/core/src/rules/async2/asyncapi-operation-security-defined.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/core/src/rules/common/security-scheme-references.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/core/src/rules/async2/index.ts Outdated
Comment thread docs/@v1/guides/lint-asyncapi.md Outdated
Comment thread packages/core/src/config/__tests__/__snapshots__/config-resolvers.test.ts.snap Outdated
@harshit078 harshit078 requested a review from vadyvas April 30, 2026 12:45
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vadyvas vadyvas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

left a few comments, could you take a look?

'info-contact': InfoContact as Async2Rule,
'info-license-strict': InfoLicenseStrict as Async2Rule,
'operation-operationId': OperationOperationId as Async2Rule,
'security-defined': SecurityDefined,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add support for AsyncAPI 3 as well. Right now the rule only applies to AsyncAPI2

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay sure !

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code uses the rule name security-defined, but the docs still say asyncapi-operation-security-defined
Can you update related changes?

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
# asyncapi-operation-security-defined
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don’t add this rule to the v1 docs

Comment thread docs/@v1/v1.sidebars.yaml Outdated
Comment thread packages/core/src/rules/async2/index.ts
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c970602. Configure here.

| AsyncAPI | Compatibility |
| -------- | ------------- |
| 2.6 | ✅ |
| 3.0 | ✅ |
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AsyncAPI 3 remains unsupported

Medium Severity

This violates the PR discussion request to add AsyncAPI 3 support: security-defined is only registered for AsyncAPI 2, while async3Rules and builtInAsync3Rules omit it. AsyncAPI 3 documents won't run the new check.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c970602. Configure here.

Use the rules in this section for AsyncAPI-specific linting.
Other rules such as the `spec` and `info.*` rules also apply to AsyncAPI.

- [asyncapi-operation-security-defined](./async/asyncapi-operation-security-defined.md): Security scheme names referenced from operations or servers must be defined in `components.securitySchemes`
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

V1 docs were changed

Low Severity

This violates the PR discussion request to skip v1 docs: the new AsyncAPI rule was added to docs/@v1, including snippets that reference a non-existent asyncapi-operation-security-defined rule/page.

Additional Locations (2)
Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c970602. Configure here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants