Commit 29e1694
fix: add missing coercion lemma (leanprover-community#40698)
Instead of having the obvious lemma `⇑f.toNonUnitalRingHom = f`, we had some weirder lemmas to try and simplify larger terms containing `⇑f.toNonUnitalRingHom`.
The unprimed name is already taken by `NonUnitalRingHomClass.toNonUnitalRingHom`; I believe the plan is to eliminate that in future, but that's out of scope for this PR.1 parent e0aa582 commit 29e1694
1 file changed
Lines changed: 6 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
701 | 701 | | |
702 | 702 | | |
703 | 703 | | |
| 704 | + | |
| 705 | + | |
| 706 | + | |
| 707 | + | |
704 | 708 | | |
705 | 709 | | |
706 | 710 | | |
| |||
710 | 714 | | |
711 | 715 | | |
712 | 716 | | |
713 | | - | |
| 717 | + | |
714 | 718 | | |
715 | 719 | | |
716 | 720 | | |
717 | 721 | | |
718 | | - | |
| 722 | + | |
719 | 723 | | |
720 | 724 | | |
721 | 725 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments