Licence is incorrectly rejected

[bronger]

I have trouble validating my crate due to the second term at

ro-crate-validator-py/src/rocrateValidator/semanticCheck.py

Line 581 in c3c5c18

if utils.is_url(license[0]) and utils.get_norm_value(entity, "@id")[0] != "./" and utils.get_norm_value(entity, "@id")[0] != "ro-crate-metadata.json":

It excludes the root data entity but shouldn’t only ro-crate-metadata.json be excluded?

[a-mile]

@bronger I think that is correct. I'm attaching a valid URL license to the root data entity and always getting an IDError result from upd_licenseRlt. I would like to understand why that second part of the if statement is necessary.

[wragge]

I'm not clear on why you can't have a license on ro-crate-metadata.json either. I'm following the pattern here to attach a separate CC0 license for the metadata itself: https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.1/contextual-entities.html#metadata-license