Update dependency Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers to v5

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers	3.12.0-beta1.25218.8 → 5.6.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	0
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[github-actions]

Test Results

0 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit aabbf3e. ± Comparison against base commit 373a597.

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

The pull request successfully updates the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers package to a stable release. Automated analysis indicates the project remains up to standards, and no security flaws or major logic bugs were identified. There are no identified gaps in the implementation of the acceptance criteria.

Test suggestions

• Verify that the project builds successfully and static analysis is correctly applied with the new version.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify that the project builds successfully and static analysis is correctly applied with the new version.

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}