-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
refactor: replace abstract visitor hierarchy with contract-based polymorphic dispatch #67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
artengin
wants to merge
7
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
refactor-architecture-2
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f587240
fix: remarks
artengin 5ff20d7
refactor: replace abstract visitor hierarchy with contract-based poly…
artengin 0520d5e
fix: remarks
artengin 450fe96
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/refactor-architecture' into refa…
artengin a0ae529
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into refactor-architectu…
artengin c2bed30
fix: remarks
artengin d13ce08
fix: remarks
artengin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| <?php | ||
|
|
||
| namespace RonasIT\Larabuilder\Contracts; | ||
|
|
||
| use PhpParser\Node; | ||
|
|
||
| interface InsertNodesContract | ||
| { | ||
| public function getInsertableNodes(): array; | ||
|
|
||
| public function getSubNodes(Node $node): array; | ||
| } |
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getInsertableNodes()now callsarray_unique()beforeclass_basename(), so inputs like['App\\Traits\\Loggable', 'Loggable']produce two identicalTraitUsenodes.filterExistingNodes()only removes traits already present in the file, not duplicates within the new candidate list, so this can emit duplicateuse Loggable;entries and generate invalid class composition when the same trait is applied twice.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.