MCP - Context7

[xyOz-dev]

Context7 Setup Guide in order to claim a bounty set by Hannes

---

Important

Adds a setup guide for Context7 MCP server to the documentation, including installation instructions and verification steps.

• Documentation:
  • Adds recommended-mcp-servers.md with a setup guide for Context7, including global and project-level configuration instructions.
  • Updates overview.md to include a link to the new Recommended MCP Servers section.
• Setup Instructions:
  • Provides JSON configuration snippets for both global and project-level setups.
  • Includes specific instructions for Windows (cmd.exe) users.
• Verification:
  • Details steps to verify Context7 installation in Roo Code.

^{This description was created by for b500a88. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

@xyOz-dev is attempting to deploy a commit to the Roo Code Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to b500a88 in 1 minute and 49 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 140 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 3 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 6 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. docs/features/mcp/overview.md:22

• Draft comment:
  Ensure the new link for ‘Recommended MCP Servers’ aligns with our documentation style and navigation. The description is clear—please verify it follows our guidelines.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

2. docs/features/mcp/recommended-mcp-servers.md:123

• Draft comment:
  File should end with a newline to adhere to POSIX conventions and our formatting standards.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% According to the rules, we should focus on code quality issues that are actionable and clear. The trailing newline is a standard formatting convention that should be enforced by tools like ESLint/Prettier rather than manual review comments. The rules specifically mention that ESLint and Prettier should be set up for enforcing code style rules automatically. The comment is technically correct - POSIX does require files to end with newlines. But is this the right way to enforce it? While the issue is valid, this kind of formatting rule should be handled automatically by ESLint/Prettier rather than through code review comments. The rules explicitly state that these tools should be set up for enforcing code style. Delete the comment since this type of formatting issue should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review.

3. docs/features/mcp/overview.md:22

• Draft comment:
  The addition of the 'Recommended MCP Servers' bullet is clear and integrates well into the overview. Please double-check that the URL (/features/mcp/recommended-mcp-servers) and naming are consistent with the new file's location for future reference.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

4. docs/features/mcp/recommended-mcp-servers.md:123

• Draft comment:
  The Recommended MCP Servers documentation is well-organized and detailed. Please add a trailing newline at the end of the file for consistency with markdown style guidelines.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

5. docs/features/mcp/recommended-mcp-servers.md:10

• Draft comment:
  Consider revising 'pull-request' to 'pull request' for consistency with standard terminology.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While technically correct that "pull request" is more standard than "pull-request", this is a very minor style issue in documentation. The rules state not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. This seems like an overly pedantic suggestion that doesn't materially impact understanding. The terminology consistency could be important for documentation searchability and professional appearance. Git/GitHub officially uses "pull request" without a hyphen. While consistency is good, this is too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment. Documentation style issues like this could be handled through a style guide or automated tools. Delete this comment as it's too minor of a style issue to warrant a PR comment.

6. docs/features/mcp/recommended-mcp-servers.md:24

• Draft comment:
  Consider verifying if 'MIT licence' should be updated to 'MIT license' to align with standard US English conventions unless British spelling is intentionally used.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The rules state not to make obvious or unimportant comments. While consistency in spelling is good, this is a very minor issue that doesn't affect functionality or understanding. The document appears to use US English elsewhere, but this isn't a critical issue that requires immediate attention. The spelling inconsistency could confuse international users or make the documentation look less professional. Documentation quality is important. While documentation quality matters, this is too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment. It doesn't impact understanding or functionality. Delete the comment as it's too minor and doesn't align with our rule about not making obvious or unimportant comments.

Workflow ID: wflow_XCDTHGLYz1xhKkDR

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
roo-code-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 7, 2025 1:52pm

[hannesrudolph]

Need to add to sidebar