docs: Enhance MCP server documentation with detailed creation process…

[hannesrudolph]

… and tool integration steps

---

Important

Enhances documentation for MCP server creation and tool integration in Roo Code, detailing server creation steps and tool workflows.

• MCP Server Creation:
  • Added detailed steps for creating MCP servers in using-mcp-in-roo.md.
  • Describes prerequisites, initiation process, and outcome of server creation.
  • Explains handling of secrets and configuration in mcp_settings.json or .roo/mcp.json.
• Tool Integration:
  • Enhanced tool-use-overview.md with a section on handling complex tasks using predefined workflows.
  • Describes the create_mcp_server workflow using tools like execute_command, write_to_file, and ask_followup_question.
• Misc:
  • Added info box in using-mcp-in-roo.md explaining MCP servers and linking to further resources.

^{This description was created by for 53ccb7f. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
roo-code-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 12, 2025 7:49pm

[ellipsis-dev]

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed everything up to 53ccb7f in 2 minutes and 8 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 76 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. docs/advanced-usage/available-tools/tool-use-overview.md:70

• Draft comment:
  Great addition explaining how complex tasks like 'create_mcp_server' are handled. Consider adding a brief example or further clarification on what qualifies as a 'complex task' for readers who may not be familiar with the internal workflow.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

2. docs/features/mcp/using-mcp-in-roo.md:8

• Draft comment:
  The admonition syntax here uses four colons (::::info ... ::::). Typically, standard Markdown admonition syntax uses three colons (e.g., :::info). Please review and adjust for consistency and compatibility with your Markdown renderer.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be a valid concern about markdown syntax consistency. However, without seeing the rest of the codebase's markdown files or documentation standards, I can't be certain whether 4 colons is actually incorrect. The comment is also purely informative rather than clearly indicating a required change. I may be too quick to dismiss this - inconsistent documentation syntax could cause rendering issues. But I also need to consider if this is important enough to block the PR. While consistency is good, this is a minor documentation formatting issue. The admonition appears to work with 4 colons, and without clear evidence that this violates a standard or causes problems, the comment creates unnecessary noise. Delete this comment as it's purely informative, doesn't clearly indicate a required change, and we don't have strong evidence that 4 colons is actually incorrect.

3. docs/features/mcp/using-mcp-in-roo.md:160

• Draft comment:
  Consider rephrasing "checked ON" to "enabled" for a more standard UI terminology. This can improve clarity in instructions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_0FzzlhpcxKX8zvJg

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}