VERDICT: CONDITIONAL
| Item | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| PRD signed off | Pass | ./prd-code-review-2026-05-05.md |
| Metrics defined | Pass | ./metrics-code-review-2026-05-06.md |
| Eval designed | Pass | ./eval-code-review-2026-05-06.yaml |
| Eval actually run | Pass | ./eval-runs/code-review-eval-2026-05-06/summary.md |
| No P0 regression (latest eval-drift) | Missing | — (first eval-drift fires Mon 2026-05-12; no prior baseline yet) |
| Premortem completed | Pass | ./premortem-code-review-2026-05-05.md (2 of 3 mitigations accepted into PRD) |
| Brief sent | Missing | — (drafting in progress; lands EOD 2026-05-09) |
Two non-P0 items are Missing: the exec brief (drafting in progress, will land before EOD) and the first eval-drift run (scheduled for Monday 2026-05-12, by design — drift detection is post-launch). Neither is a P0 release-blocker per the launch-readiness gate definition. Confidence: high that this is a CONDITIONAL, not a NO-GO. The PRD-side risk picture is clean: premortem mitigations 1 and 2 landed, eval run from 2026-05-07 had two P0 fails which were addressed by eng landings on 2026-05-08 (severity prompt + cross-file dedupe); P0 subset re-run earlier this morning was green. Next: /brief code-review exec (in-flight) and let /eval-drift baseline on Monday as planned.
2026-05-09 — Shipping despite: [Brief sent: Missing], [No P0 regression (latest eval-drift): Missing] Reason given: Brief is being drafted concurrently with this readiness check and will land before EOD Friday — verified with the comms partner. Eval-drift baseline is, by design, scheduled for the first Monday post-launch (2026-05-12); requiring it pre-launch would be a chicken-and-egg gate. Both gaps are acknowledged in writing and tracked; both will be closed within 72 hours of GA. Confidence: high.
- 2026-05-09 — launch-readiness(code-review): SHIPPED-DESPITE-[brief-missing,eval-drift-missing] — examples/walkthrough-code-review/launch-readiness-code-review-2026-05-09.md