Skip to content

Commit 9473356

Browse files
Update CHANGELOG.md
1 parent 07085ac commit 9473356

1 file changed

Lines changed: 107 additions & 89 deletions

File tree

CHANGELOG.md

Lines changed: 107 additions & 89 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,110 +8,128 @@ This project follows a draft-oriented versioning model while the specification r
88

99
## [Unreleased]
1010

11-
### Planned
12-
13-
- Add additional v0.2 examples for:
14-
- high-confidence natural-source assessment
15-
- hybrid structural-originality assessment
16-
- disputed-origin assessment
17-
- declaration-conflict assessment
18-
- Add a dedicated review-routing model document.
19-
- Add relationship documents for:
20-
- CollapseMonitor
21-
- Royalty Readiness
22-
- Trace Protocol
23-
- Structure Fingerprint
24-
- Extend the schema to support:
25-
- detailed scoring model output
26-
- warning-flag detail objects
27-
- recursive synthetic risk output
28-
- review-routing metadata
29-
30-
### Notes
11+
### Added
3112

32-
The next stage should focus on making the v0.2 model more operational without turning purity scoring into automatic legal or financial judgment.
13+
- Added `docs/relationship-to-consciousness-circle.md` to explain how AI Purity Detection relates to meaning-origin assessment, initial friction, resonance patterns, and Consciousness Circle.
14+
- Added `docs/relationship-to-royalty-readiness.md` to explain how purity assessment supports royalty-readiness review without directly determining allocation or payment.
15+
- Added `docs/relationship-to-collapse-monitor.md` to explain how source-level purity assessments may provide aggregate signals for CollapseMonitor and ecosystem-health monitoring.
16+
- Added `docs/api-design-notes.md` to outline possible API endpoints, core objects, response structures, safety rules, and integration paths for future implementation.
3317

34-
---
18+
### Changed
3519

36-
## [0.2.0] - 2026-05-25
20+
- Expanded the v0.2 relationship layer beyond scoring and warning flags.
21+
- Clarified that AI Purity Detection can connect to:
22+
- Consciousness Circle
23+
- Royalty Readiness
24+
- CollapseMonitor
25+
- Trace Protocol
26+
- future API-based source-preservation systems
27+
- Strengthened the distinction between:
28+
- assessment and judgment
29+
- purity scoring and royalty allocation
30+
- source integrity and meaning integrity
31+
- local source assessment and ecosystem-level monitoring
3732

38-
### Added
33+
### Notes
3934

40-
- Added initial `README.md` for **AI Purity Detection Algorithm v0.2**.
41-
- Added `docs/v0.2-roadmap.md` to define the proposed direction for the v0.2 specification.
42-
- Added `docs/scoring-weighting-model.md` to define a draft signal-weighting and confidence-adjusted scoring model.
43-
- Added `docs/warning-flag-severity-model.md` to define warning-flag severity levels, review routing, and downstream impact handling.
44-
- Added `schemas/purity-assessment.schema.json` for validating purity assessment examples.
45-
- Added `examples/purity-assessment.sample.yaml` as a standard purity assessment example.
46-
- Added `examples/purity-assessment.low-confidence.sample.yaml` to demonstrate weak provenance, unclear origin, low confidence, review-required routing, and blocked royalty-readiness status.
47-
- Added `examples/purity-assessment.recursive-synthetic-risk.sample.yaml` to demonstrate high recursive synthetic risk, weak primary-source provenance, high AI-pattern similarity, blocked training use, and blocked royalty-readiness status.
48-
- Added `.github/workflows/validate-examples.yml` to validate YAML examples against the JSON Schema.
49-
- Added `LICENSE`.
50-
51-
### Defined
52-
53-
- Defined `origin_purity_score` as a normalized estimate of source-origin composition.
54-
- Defined `ai_generated_ratio` as a separate estimate of AI-generated or AI-assisted content ratio.
55-
- Defined `warning_flags` as routing and review-support signals.
56-
- Defined a draft signal-weighting model using:
57-
- `provenance_evidence_score`
58-
- `author_declaration_score`
59-
- `structural_originality_score`
60-
- `revision_lineage_score`
61-
- `citation_transparency_score`
62-
- `ai_pattern_risk_score`
63-
- `structure_fingerprint_distinctiveness_score`
64-
- `recursive_synthetic_risk_score`
65-
- `signal_confidence_quality_score`
66-
- Defined warning severity levels:
67-
- `info`
68-
- `warning`
69-
- `review_required`
70-
- `blocking`
71-
- Defined review-routing modes:
72-
- `none`
73-
- `recommended`
74-
- `required`
75-
- `blocking_review`
76-
77-
### Validation
78-
79-
- Added GitHub Actions validation for:
80-
- `examples/purity-assessment.sample.yaml`
81-
- `examples/purity-assessment.low-confidence.sample.yaml`
82-
- `examples/purity-assessment.recursive-synthetic-risk.sample.yaml`
83-
- Confirmed that all three example files pass validation against:
84-
- `schemas/purity-assessment.schema.json`
35+
The current `Unreleased` layer prepares the specification for broader integration.
8536

86-
### Notes
37+
The newly added relationship documents position AI Purity Detection Algorithm v0.2 as a bridge between:
8738

88-
This release establishes **AI Purity Detection Algorithm v0.2** as a draft algorithmic layer for source-preservation systems.
39+
```text
40+
source-origin assessment
41+
42+
meaning-structure assessment
43+
44+
collapse-risk monitoring
45+
46+
royalty-readiness review
47+
48+
future API implementation
49+
50+
These documents do not turn purity scoring into an automatic legal, financial, or metaphysical decision system.
51+
52+
They preserve the core principle:
53+
54+
Expose evidence.
55+
Expose uncertainty.
56+
Route risk to review.
57+
Do not automate judgment too early.
58+
[0.2.0] - 2026-05-25
59+
Added
60+
Added initial README.md for AI Purity Detection Algorithm v0.2.
61+
Added docs/v0.2-roadmap.md to define the proposed direction for the v0.2 specification.
62+
Added docs/scoring-weighting-model.md to define a draft signal-weighting and confidence-adjusted scoring model.
63+
Added docs/warning-flag-severity-model.md to define warning-flag severity levels, review routing, and downstream impact handling.
64+
Added schemas/purity-assessment.schema.json for validating purity assessment examples.
65+
Added examples/purity-assessment.sample.yaml as a standard purity assessment example.
66+
Added examples/purity-assessment.low-confidence.sample.yaml to demonstrate weak provenance, unclear origin, low confidence, review-required routing, and blocked royalty-readiness status.
67+
Added examples/purity-assessment.recursive-synthetic-risk.sample.yaml to demonstrate high recursive synthetic risk, weak primary-source provenance, high AI-pattern similarity, blocked training use, and blocked royalty-readiness status.
68+
Added .github/workflows/validate-examples.yml to validate YAML examples against the JSON Schema.
69+
Added LICENSE.
70+
Added CITATION.cff.
71+
Defined
72+
Defined origin_purity_score as a normalized estimate of source-origin composition.
73+
Defined ai_generated_ratio as a separate estimate of AI-generated or AI-assisted content ratio.
74+
Defined warning_flags as routing and review-support signals.
75+
Defined recursive_synthetic_risk as a key warning and ecosystem-risk signal.
76+
Defined a draft signal-weighting model using:
77+
provenance_evidence_score
78+
author_declaration_score
79+
structural_originality_score
80+
revision_lineage_score
81+
citation_transparency_score
82+
ai_pattern_risk_score
83+
structure_fingerprint_distinctiveness_score
84+
recursive_synthetic_risk_score
85+
signal_confidence_quality_score
86+
Defined warning severity levels:
87+
info
88+
warning
89+
review_required
90+
blocking
91+
Defined review-routing modes:
92+
none
93+
recommended
94+
required
95+
blocking_review
96+
Validation
97+
Added GitHub Actions validation for:
98+
examples/purity-assessment.sample.yaml
99+
examples/purity-assessment.low-confidence.sample.yaml
100+
examples/purity-assessment.recursive-synthetic-risk.sample.yaml
101+
Confirmed that all three example files pass validation against:
102+
schemas/purity-assessment.schema.json
103+
Notes
104+
105+
This release establishes AI Purity Detection Algorithm v0.2 as a draft algorithmic layer for source-preservation systems.
89106
90107
The specification focuses on:
91108
92-
- origin-purity scoring
93-
- natural / synthetic data separation
94-
- hybrid data classification
95-
- recursive synthetic risk detection
96-
- warning-flag severity
97-
- confidence handling
98-
- review routing
99-
- downstream-use guidance
100-
- model-collapse monitoring support
101-
- royalty-readiness review support
109+
origin-purity scoring
110+
natural / synthetic data separation
111+
hybrid data classification
112+
recursive synthetic risk detection
113+
warning-flag severity
114+
confidence handling
115+
review routing
116+
downstream-use guidance
117+
model-collapse monitoring support
118+
royalty-readiness review support
102119
103120
This release does not attempt to:
104121
105-
- prove legal authorship
106-
- determine copyright ownership
107-
- automatically assign royalties
108-
- ban AI-assisted creation
109-
- punish synthetic content
110-
- perfectly detect AI-generated text
111-
- replace human or multi-wing review
122+
prove legal authorship
123+
determine copyright ownership
124+
automatically assign royalties
125+
ban AI-assisted creation
126+
punish synthetic content
127+
perfectly detect AI-generated text
128+
replace human or multi-wing review
112129
113130
The core principle remains:
114131
115-
```text
116132
Purity is not moral judgment.
117133
Purity is ecological signal.
134+
135+
This version provides a review-support and ecosystem-health layer for future AI source-preservation systems.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)