Drop the high-memory label from WeakConvergence3 - #4063
Draft
ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Drop the high-memory label from WeakConvergence3#4063ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
WeakConvergence3 (srk_weak_final_non_diagonal.jl) is pinned to a `high-memory` runner label that no runner in the SciML fleet carries, so the job is never scheduled: it sits queued for 24 h and is expired by GitHub, holding the whole Sublibrary CI run open behind it (SciML#4030). The label is not needed. The group's studies pass a reducing `output_func` to `EnsembleProblem` and an `expected_value` to `test_convergence`, so each trajectory contributes 8 bytes to the retained result rather than a whole solution object. Running the group to completion on an 8 vCPU box: peak RSS 2.56 GiB, wall 1:26:23, tests passed That fits the standard self-hosted pool with room to spare, so point it there. The 300-minute timeout is left alone — at 86 minutes the group is slow, which is the actual reason it is expensive, and that has nothing to do with memory. Only this group is changed. The other four `high-memory` groups in this file are being measured separately and are not touched here; three of them did not finish inside the two-hour budget I first gave them, so I have no completed figure for them yet. Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013WW2jGeoWZVZu7AiscUNSz
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WeakConvergence3(srk_weak_final_non_diagonal.jl) is pinned to ahigh-memoryrunner label that no runner in the SciML fleet carries, so the job is never scheduled — it sits queued for 24 h, is expired by GitHub, and holds the whole Sublibrary CI run open behind it (#4030).The label is not needed. This group's studies pass a reducing
output_functoEnsembleProblemand anexpected_valuetotest_convergence:so each trajectory contributes 8 bytes to the retained result rather than a whole solution object — measured at exactly 8.0 B/trajectory. It is a slow group, not a memory-hungry one.
Measured
Run to completion on an 8 vCPU box,
GROUP=WeakConvergence3,JULIA_NUM_THREADS=8:2.56 GiB fits the standard self-hosted pool with room to spare, so point it there. The 300-minute timeout is left alone — at 86 minutes the group genuinely is slow, and that is the real reason it is expensive.
Scope
Only this group. The other four
high-memorygroups in this file are being measured separately and are not touched here — three of them did not finish inside the two-hour budget I first gave them, so I have no completed figure for those yet and will not unpin on a projection. I have already been wrong once about which groups a memory fix rescues (SROCKC2WeakConvergenceturned out unaffected by thetest_convergenceretention fix in #4056), so these are going one at a time on completed runs only.Links
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_013WW2jGeoWZVZu7AiscUNSz