Release OrdinaryDiffEq 7.2.1 and StochasticDiffEq 7.1.3 - #4088
Merged
Conversation
Both already carry SciMLBase = "3.39" on master, but neither has been released, so the widened bound has no effect and SciMLSensitivity CI still cannot resolve. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version bumps only — two lines.
Both packages already carry the widened
SciMLBase = "3.39"on master, but master equals the registry in both cases, so the fix has never shipped:Until these register,
SciMLSensitivityCI cannot resolve. General'sCompat.tomlalready carries forward-looking entries for["7.2.1 - 7"]and["7.1.3 - 7"], but those versions do not exist yet so they have no effect.Not included: raising the root's sublibrary floors to the 15 versions registered earlier today. That is a separate, wider change — it would constrain every OrdinaryDiffEq user to the new sublibraries — and is what the MinimallyDisruptiveCurves transitive-dependency cleanup additionally needs.