-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathRng.yaml
More file actions
102 lines (82 loc) · 6.78 KB
/
Copy pathRng.yaml
File metadata and controls
102 lines (82 loc) · 6.78 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
id: Rng
name: category of rngs
notation: $\Rng$
objects: rngs, that is, non-unital rings
morphisms: maps that preserve addition and multiplication
description: null
nlab_link: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Rng
tags:
- algebra
related_categories:
- CRing
- Ring
comments:
- It is likely that the epimorphisms can be described as for <a href="/category/CRing">$\CRing$</a>.
satisfied_properties:
- property: locally small
proof: There is a forgetful functor $\Rng \to \Set$ and $\Set$ is locally small.
- property: finitary algebraic
proof: Take the algebraic theory of a rng.
- property: pointed
proof: The zero ring is a zero object.
- property: Malcev
proof: This follows in the same way as for <a href="/category/Grp">$\Grp$</a>, see also Example 2.2.5 in <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Malcev,+protomodular,+homological+and+semi-abelian+categories" target="_blank">Malcev, protomodular, homological and semi-abelian categories</a>.
unsatisfied_properties:
- property: skeletal
proof: This is trivial.
- property: balanced
proof: The inclusion $\IZ \hookrightarrow \IQ$ is a counterexample. (The proof can be reduced to the unital case.)
- property: cogenerator
proof: 'We apply <a href="/content/missing_cogenerator">this lemma</a> to the collection of fields: Any non-zero rng homomorphism from a field to a rng must be injective, and for every infinite cardinal $\kappa$ the field of rational functions in $\kappa$ variables has cardinality $\geq \kappa$.'
- property: counital
proof: >-
If $\IZ\langle X_1,\dotsc,X_n \rangle_0$ denotes the free rng on $n$ generators (non-commutative polynomials without constant term), then the canonical homomorphism
$$\IZ\langle X,Y \rangle_0 = \IZ\langle X \rangle_0 \sqcup \IZ\langle Y \rangle_0 \to \IZ\langle X \rangle_0 \times \IZ\langle Y \rangle_0$$
is not a monomorphism since $\IZ\langle X,Y \rangle_0$ is not commutative.
- property: CIP
# TODO: remove code duplication with "counital" proof
proof: >-
If $\IZ\langle X_1,\dotsc,X_n \rangle_0$ denotes the free rng on $n$ generators (non-commutative polynomials without constant term), then the canonical homomorphism
$$\IZ\langle X,Y \rangle_0 = \IZ\langle X \rangle_0 \sqcup \IZ\langle Y \rangle_0 \to \IZ\langle X \rangle_0 \times \IZ\langle Y \rangle_0$$
is not a monomorphism since $\IZ\langle X,Y \rangle_0$ is not commutative.
- property: CSP
proof: Assume that $\coprod_n \IZ \to \prod_n \IZ$ is an epimorphism in $\Rng$. Then $((\coprod_n \IZ)^+)^{\ab} \to \prod_n \IZ$ would be an epimorphism in $\CRing$, where $(-)^+$ denotes the unitalization and $(-)^{\ab}$ the abelianization. But if $R \to S$ is an epimorphism of commutative rings, then $\card(S) \leq \card(R)$ by <a href="https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04W0" target="_blank">SP/04W0</a>. Since $((\coprod_n \IZ)^+)^{\ab}$ is countable and $\prod_n \IZ$ is not, we get a contradiction.
- property: coregular
proof: 'We can copy the proof for <a href="/category/Ring">$\Ring$</a>. In short, the inclusion of diagonal matrices $\IQ^2 \hookrightarrow M_2(\IQ)$ is a regular monomorphism, but becomes zero after taking the pushout with $p_1 : \IQ^2 \twoheadrightarrow \IQ$ because $M_2(\IQ)$ is simple.'
- property: regular quotient object classifier
proof: 'Assume that $\Rng$ has a regular quotient object classifier $P$. Consider the functor $N : \Ab \to \Rng$ that equips an abelian group with zero multiplication. It is fully faithful and has a left adjoint mapping a rng $R$ to the abelian group $R/R^2$. If $R$ is a rng with zero multiplication and $R \to S$ is a surjective homomorphism, then $S$ has zero multiplication. Therefore, the assumptions of Lemma 1 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a> (dualized) apply and we conclude that $P/P^2$ is a regular quotient object classifier of $\Ab$. But we already know that <a href="/category/Ab">$\Ab$</a> has no such object (in fact, the only additive categories with such an object are trivial by <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4086192" target="_blank">MSE/4086192</a>).'
- property: cocartesian cofiltered limits
proof: >-
Consider the ring $A = \IZ[X]$ and the sequence of rings $B_n = \IZ[Y]/(Y^{n+1})$ with projections $B_{n+1} \to B_n$, whose limit is $\IZ[[Y]]$ (both in $\Ring$ and $\Rng$). Every element in the coproduct of rngs $\IZ[X] \sqcup \IZ[[Y]]$ has a finite "free product" length. Now consider the elements
$$w_n = (1 + XY) (1+XY^2) \cdots (1+X Y^n) - 1 \in A \sqcup B_n.$$
Because of $w_n \equiv w_{n-1} \bmod Y^n$ these form an element $w \in \lim_n (A \sqcup B_n)$. Expanding $w_n$, the longest term is $XY XY^2 \cdots X Y^n$ of "free product" length $2n$, which is unbounded.
- property: cofiltered-limit-stable epimorphisms
proof: 'We know that <a href="/category/Ring">$\Ring$</a> does not have this property. Now use the contrapositive of the dual of Lemma 2 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a> applied to the forgetful functor $\Ring \to \Rng$. We only need to verify that it preserves epimorphisms: Let $f : R \to S$ be an epimorphism in $\Ring$ and let $g,h : S \rightrightarrows T$ be two homomorphisms of rngs with $gf = hf$. The element $e = g(1) = h(1) \in T$ is idempotent, and $g,h$ become homomorphisms of rings $S \rightrightarrows eTe$. Hence, $g=h$.'
- property: effective cocongruences
proof: >-
The counterexample is similar to the one at <a href="https://mathoverflow.net/a/510809" target="_blank">MO/510744</a> for $\Ring$: in this case,
$$X \coloneqq \langle p \mid p^2 = p \rangle_{\Rng} \cong \IZ$$
and
$$E \coloneqq \langle p, q \mid p^2 = p, q^2 = q, pq = q, qp = p \rangle_{\Rng} \cong \begin{pmatrix} \IZ & \IZ \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$
via
$$p \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad q \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$
From here, the rest of the proof is similar to the one for <a href="/category/Ring">$\Ring$</a>.
special_objects:
initial object:
description: trivial ring
terminal object:
description: zero ring
coproducts:
description: see <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4975797" target="_blank">MSE/4975797</a>
products:
description: direct products with pointwise operations
special_morphisms:
isomorphisms:
description: bijective rng homomorphisms
proof: This characterization holds in every algebraic category.
monomorphisms:
description: injective rng homomorphisms
proof: 'This holds in every finitary algebraic category: the forgetful functor to $\Set$ is faithful, hence reflects monomorphisms, and it is continuous (even representable), hence preserves monomorphisms.'
regular epimorphisms:
description: surjective homomorphisms
proof: This holds in every finitary algebraic category.