|
| 1 | +INSERT INTO category_property_assignments ( |
| 2 | + category_id, |
| 3 | + property_id, |
| 4 | + is_satisfied, |
| 5 | + reason |
| 6 | +) |
| 7 | +VALUES |
| 8 | +( |
| 9 | + 'PMet', |
| 10 | + 'locally small', |
| 11 | + TRUE, |
| 12 | + 'There is a forgetful functor $\mathbf{PMet} \to \mathbf{Set}$ and $\mathbf{Set}$ is locally small.' |
| 13 | +), |
| 14 | +( |
| 15 | + 'PMet', |
| 16 | + 'equalizers', |
| 17 | + TRUE, |
| 18 | + 'Just restrict the pseudo-metric to the equalizer built from the sets.' |
| 19 | +), |
| 20 | +( |
| 21 | + 'PMet', |
| 22 | + 'binary products', |
| 23 | + TRUE, |
| 24 | + 'The product of two pseudo-metric spaces $(X,d)$, $(Y,d)$ is $(X \times Y,d)$ with $d((x_1,y_1),(x_2,x_2)) := \sup(d(x_1,x_2),d(y_1,y_2))$.' |
| 25 | +), |
| 26 | +( |
| 27 | + 'PMet', |
| 28 | + 'terminal object', |
| 29 | + TRUE, |
| 30 | + 'The one-point (pseudo-)metric space is terminal.' |
| 31 | +), |
| 32 | +( |
| 33 | + 'PMet', |
| 34 | + 'coequalizers', |
| 35 | + TRUE, |
| 36 | + 'See <a href="https://mathoverflow.net/questions/123739" target="_blank">MO/123739</a>.' |
| 37 | +), |
| 38 | +( |
| 39 | + 'PMet', |
| 40 | + 'directed colimits', |
| 41 | + TRUE, |
| 42 | + 'Given a directed diagram $(X_i)$ of pseudo-metric spaces, take the directed colimit $X$ of the underlying sets with the following pseudo-metric: If $x,y \in X$, let $d(x,y)$ be infimum of all $d(x_i,y_i)$, where $x_i,y_i \in X_i$ are some preimages of $x,y$ in some $X_i$. The definition ensures that each $X_i \to X$ is non-expansive, and the universal property is easy to check.' |
| 43 | +), |
| 44 | +( |
| 45 | + 'PMet', |
| 46 | + 'cartesian filtered colimits', |
| 47 | + TRUE, |
| 48 | + 'The canonical map $\mathrm{colim}_i (X \times Y_i) \to X \times \mathrm{colim}_i Y_i$ is an isomorphism for directed diagrams $(Y_i)$: It is bijective by the concrete description of directed colimits and since $\mathbf{Set}$ has cartesian filtered colimits. It is isometric because of the elementary observation $\inf_i \max(r, s_i) = \max(r, \inf_i s_i)$ for $r, s_i \in \mathbb{R}$, where $i \leq j \implies s_i \geq s_j$.' |
| 49 | +), |
| 50 | +( |
| 51 | + 'PMet', |
| 52 | + 'strict initial object', |
| 53 | + TRUE, |
| 54 | + 'The empty (pseudo-)metric space is initial and clearly strict.' |
| 55 | +), |
| 56 | +( |
| 57 | + 'PMet', |
| 58 | + 'generator', |
| 59 | + TRUE, |
| 60 | + 'The one-point (pseudo-)metric space is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor $\mathbf{Met} \to \mathbf{Set}$.' |
| 61 | +), |
| 62 | +( |
| 63 | + 'PMet', |
| 64 | + 'cogenerator', |
| 65 | + TRUE, |
| 66 | + 'The set $\{0,1\}$ equipped with the pseudo-metric $d(0,1)=0$ is a cogenerator since every map into is automatically non-expansive and since $\{0,1\}$ is a cogenerator in $\mathbf{Set}$.' |
| 67 | +), |
| 68 | +( |
| 69 | + 'PMet', |
| 70 | + 'semi-strongly connected', |
| 71 | + TRUE, |
| 72 | + 'Every non-empty pseudo-metric space is weakly terminal (by using constant maps).' |
| 73 | +), |
| 74 | +( |
| 75 | + 'PMet', |
| 76 | + 'well-powered', |
| 77 | + TRUE, |
| 78 | + 'This follows since monomorphisms are injective (see below).' |
| 79 | +), |
| 80 | +( |
| 81 | + 'PMet', |
| 82 | + 'well-copowered', |
| 83 | + TRUE, |
| 84 | + 'This follows since epimorphisms are surjective (see below).' |
| 85 | +), |
| 86 | +( |
| 87 | + 'PMet', |
| 88 | + 'balanced', |
| 89 | + FALSE, |
| 90 | + 'Let $d : \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ be the usual Euclidean metric on $\mathbb{R}$ and $0 : \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ be the zero pseudo-metric. Then the identity map $(\mathbb{R},d) \to (\mathbb{R},0)$ provides a counterexample.' |
| 91 | +), |
| 92 | +( |
| 93 | + 'PMet', |
| 94 | + 'cartesian closed', |
| 95 | + FALSE, |
| 96 | + 'This is proven in <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/5131457" target="_blank">MSE/5131457</a>.' |
| 97 | +), |
| 98 | +( |
| 99 | + 'PMet', |
| 100 | + 'countable powers', |
| 101 | + FALSE, |
| 102 | + 'Assume that the power $P = \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}$ exists, where $\mathbb{R}$ has the usual (pseudo-)metric. Since the forgetful functor $\mathbf{PMet} \to \mathbf{Set}$ is representable, it preserves limits, powers in particular. Thus, we may assume that $P$ is the set of sequences of numbers and that the projections $p_n : P \to \mathbb{R}$ are given by $p_n(x) = x_n$. Now consider the sequences $x = (n)_n$ and $y = (0)_n$. Since each $p_n$ is non-expansive, we get $d(x,y) \geq d(p_n(x),p_n(y)) = d(n,0) = n$. But then $d(x,y) = \infty$, a contradiction.' |
| 103 | +), |
| 104 | +( |
| 105 | + 'PMet', |
| 106 | + 'binary copowers', |
| 107 | + FALSE, |
| 108 | + 'The coproduct of two non-empty pseudo-metric spaces does not exist, see <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1778408" target="_blank">MSE/1778408</a> (the proof also works for pseudo-metric spaces). For example, the copower $\mathbb{R} \sqcup \mathbb{R}$ does not exist. We only get coproducts when allowing $\infty$ as a distance.' |
| 109 | +), |
| 110 | +( |
| 111 | + 'PMet', |
| 112 | + 'strict terminal object', |
| 113 | + FALSE, |
| 114 | + 'This is trivial.' |
| 115 | +), |
| 116 | +( |
| 117 | + 'PMet', |
| 118 | + 'essentially small', |
| 119 | + FALSE, |
| 120 | + 'This is trivial.' |
| 121 | +), |
| 122 | +( |
| 123 | + 'PMet', |
| 124 | + 'skeletal', |
| 125 | + FALSE, |
| 126 | + 'This is trivial.' |
| 127 | +), |
| 128 | +( |
| 129 | + 'PMet', |
| 130 | + 'Malcev', |
| 131 | + FALSE, |
| 132 | + 'Take any counterexample in $\mathbf{Set}$ and equip it with the zero pseudo-metric.' |
| 133 | +); |
0 commit comments