Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .cspell.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
"Catabase",
"catdat",
"Catégories",
"Čech",
"clopen",
"Clowder",
"coaccessible",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@
"colimits",
"comonad",
"comonadic",
"compactification",
"conormal",
"copower",
"copowers",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -228,10 +230,13 @@
"surjectivity",
"Tarski",
"tensoring",
"Tietze",
"topoi",
"Turso",
"Tychonoff",
"unital",
"unitalization",
"Urysohn",
"vercel",
"Vite",
"Wedderburn",
Expand Down
127 changes: 127 additions & 0 deletions databases/catdat/data/categories/CompHaus.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
id: CompHaus
name: category of compact Hausdorff spaces
notation: $\CompHaus$
objects: compact Hausdorff spaces
morphisms: continuous functions
description: This is the full subcategory of $\Top$ consisting of those spaces that are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_space" target="_blank">compact</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hausdorff_space" target="_blank">Hausdorff</a>.
nlab_link: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/compact+Hausdorff+space

tags:
- topology

related_categories:
- Haus
- Top

satisfied_properties:
- property_id: locally small
reason: It is a full subcategory of $\Top$, which is locally small.

- property_id: generator
reason: The one-point space is a generator because it represents the forgetful functor to $\Set$, which is faithful.

- property_id: products
reason: By the Tychonoff product theorem, a product in $\Top$ of compact Hausdorff spaces is compact; it is also clearly Hausdorff. Since the forgetful functor from $\CompHaus$ to $\Top$ is fully faithful, this limit is reflected in $\CompHaus$ as well.
check_redundancy: false

- property_id: equalizers
reason: 'The equalizer in $\Top$ of two continuous functions $f, g : X \rightrightarrows Y$ between compact Hausdorff spaces is a closed subspace of $X$, and therefore it is also compact Hausdorff. Since the forgetful functor from $\CompHaus$ to $\Top$ is fully faithful, this limit is reflected in $\CompHaus$ as well.'
check_redundancy: false

- property_id: cocomplete
reason: $\CompHaus$ is a reflective subcategory of $\Top$, with the reflector being the Stone-Čech compactification functor. See <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/compact+Hausdorff+space#StoneCechCompactification" target="_blank">nLab</a> for example. Therefore, as usual, we can form colimits in $\CompHaus$ by forming colimits in $\Top$ and then applying Stone-Čech compatification.

- property_id: regular
# TODO: rework this when Barr-exact is added
reason: The forgetful functor from $\CompHaus$ to $\Set$ is monadic; see for example <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/compact+Hausdorff+space#compact_hausdorff_spaces_are_monadic_over_sets">nLab</a>. Therefore, by <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/colimits+in+categories+of+algebras#exact">this result</a>, $\CompHaus$ is Barr-exact and in particular is regular.

- property_id: effective congruences
Comment thread
dschepler marked this conversation as resolved.
# TODO: rework this when Barr-exact is added
reason: The forgetful functor from $\CompHaus$ to $\Set$ is monadic; see for example <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/compact+Hausdorff+space#compact_hausdorff_spaces_are_monadic_over_sets">nLab</a>. Therefore, by <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/colimits+in+categories+of+algebras#exact">this result</a>, $\CompHaus$ is Barr-exact, and in particular it has effective congruences.

- property_id: cogenerator
reason: 'The unit interval $[0, 1]$ is a cogenerator: Suppose we have $f, g : X \rightrightarrows Y$ with $f \ne g$. Choose $x\in X$ such that $f(x) \ne g(x)$. Then by Urysohn''s lemma, there is a continuous function $h : Y \to [0, 1]$ such that $h(f(x)) = 0$ and $h(g(x)) = 1$. Therefore, $h\circ f \ne h\circ g$.'

- property_id: extensive
reason: This follows as for $\Top$ or $\Haus$ since finite coproducts in $\CompHaus$ are foemd as disjoint union spaces with the disjoint union topology.

- property_id: epi-regular
reason: |-
First, any epimorphism $f : X\to Y$ is surjective: if not, its image would be a proper subset of $Y$, which is compact and hence closed. Then by Urysohn's lemma, there would be a non-zero continuous function $g : Y \to [0, 1]$ which is $0$ on the image; but then $g \circ f = 0 \circ f$, giving a contradiction.

Now the identity morphism from $Y$, with the quotient topology of $f$, to $Y$ with its given topology is a bijective continuous function between compact Hausdorff spaces, so it is a homeomorphism. In other words, $f$ is a quotient map. Therefore, we see that if $g, h : E \rightrightarrows X$ is the kernel pair of $f$, and $U : \CompHaus \to \Top$ is the forgetful functor, then $U(f)$ is the coequalizer of $U(g)$ and $U(h)$. Since $U$ is fully faithful, that implies $f$ is the coequalizer of $g$ and $h$.

- property_id: semi-strongly connected
reason: This is already true for <a href="/category/Top">$\Top$</a>.

- property_id: coregular
reason: 'It suffices to show that pushouts preserve (regular) monomorphisms in $\CompHaus$. Thus, suppose we have a pushout square
$$\begin{CD}
A @> i >> B \\
@V f VV @VV g V \\
C @>> j > D,
\end{CD}$$
with $i : A \hookrightarrow B$ a monomorphism. Then for any pair of distinct elements $c, c'' \in C$, by Urysohn''s lemma there exists $\gamma : C \to [0, 1]$ with $\gamma(c) = 0$ and $\gamma(c'') = 1$. Also, by Tietze''s extension theorem, there exists $\beta : B \to [0, 1]$ such that $\beta \circ i = \gamma \circ f$. By the pushout property, there is a unique $\delta : D \to [0, 1]$ such that $\delta \circ g = \beta$ and $\delta \circ j = \gamma$. Since $\delta(j(c)) \ne \delta(j(c''))$, we conclude that $j(c) \ne j(c'')$. This shows that $j$ is injective, so it is a regular monomorphism.'

- property_id: cofiltered-limit-stable epimorphisms
reason: 'Suppose we have a cofiltered diagram of epimorphisms $(f_i : X_i \to Y_i)$, and $y = (y_i) \in \lim_i Y_i$. Then by lemma 1 <a href="/pdf/comphaus_copresentable.pdf">here</a>, the limit of $f_i^{-1}(\{ y_i \})$ is non-empty. If $x$ is in this limit, that implies that $(\lim_i f_i)(x) = y$.'

- property_id: locally copresentable
reason: A proof can be found <a href="/pdf/comphaus_copresentable.pdf">here</a>.

unsatisfied_properties:
- property_id: Malcev
reason: This is clear since $\FinSet$ is not Malcev and can be interpreted as the subcategory of finite discrete spaces.

- property_id: skeletal
reason: This is trivial.

- property_id: regular subobject classifier
reason: The proof is almost identical to the one for <a href="/category/Haus">$\Haus$</a>.

- property_id: natural numbers object
reason: >-
Let $I := [0, 1]$. If a natural numbers object $(N, z : 1 \to N, s : N \to N)$ existed, then we could iterate the initial conditions $I\to I\times I$, $x \mapsto (x, x)$ and the recursive step function $I\times I \to I \times I$, $(x, y) \mapsto (x, xy)$ to get a continuous function $N \times I \to I \times I$ such that $(s^n(z), x) \mapsto (x, x^n)$ for $x\in I$, $n \in \IN$. The sequence $(s^n(z)) \in N$ has a convergent subnet $(s^{n_\lambda}(z))_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$, say with limit $y$. Thus, for any $x\in I$ and $\lambda \in \Lambda$, we have $(s^{n_\lambda}(z), x) \mapsto (x, x^{n_\lambda})$. Taking limits, we see $(y, x) \mapsto (x, 0)$ if $x \ne 1$ or $(y, x) \mapsto (x, 1)$ if $x = 1$. In other words, $(y, x) \mapsto (x, \delta_{x, 1})$ for all $x\in I$. However, that contradicts the fact that the composition
$$\begin{align*}
I & \overset{y \times \id}\longrightarrow N\times I \to I\times I \overset{p_2}\longrightarrow I, \\
x & \mapsto (y, x) \mapsto (x, \delta_{x,1}) \mapsto \delta_{x,1},
\end{align*}$$
would have to be continuous.

- property_id: filtered-colimit-stable monomorphisms
reason: 'The proof is similar to <a href="/category/Haus">$\Haus$</a>. For $n \geq 1$ let $X_n$ be the pushout of $[1/n, 1] \hookrightarrow [0, 1]$ with itself. That is, $X_n$ is the union of two unit intervals $[0, 1] \times \{ 1 \}$ and $[0, 1] \times \{ 2 \}$ where we identify $(x,1) \equiv (x,2)$ when $x \geq 1/n$. As in the construction for $\Haus$, we see that the colimit in $\Haus$ is $[0, 1]$ where all corresponding points of both unit intervals are identified. Since this is compact Hausdorff, it also provides the colimit in $\CompHaus$. Again, the injective continuous maps $\{1,2\} \to X_n$, $i \mapsto (0,i)$ (where $\{1,2\}$ is discrete) become the constant map $0 : \{1,2\} \to [0,1]$ in the colimit, which is not a monomorphism.'

- property_id: exact cofiltered limits
reason: |-
Consider the $\IN$-codirected systems $X_n := [0, 1] \times [0, 1/n]$ with the maps $X_{n+1} \to X_n$ being inclusion maps, and $Y_n := [0, 1+1/n]$ with the maps $Y_{n+1} \to Y_n$ also being inclusion maps. We define $f_n : X_n \to Y_n$, $(x, y) \mapsto x$ and $g_n : X_n \to Y_n$, $(x, y) \mapsto x+y$. It is straightforward to check these give morphisms of $\IN$-codirected systems in $\CompHaus$.

Now for each $n$, we claim the coequalizer of $f_n$ and $g_n$ is a singleton space. To see this, we prove the more general result that for $r, s > 0$ the coequalizer of $f, g : [0, r] \times [0, s] \rightrightarrows [0, r+s]$, $f(x,y) = x$, $g(x,y) = x+y$ is a singleton. We must show that for any $h : [0, r+s] \to T$ with $h\circ f = h\circ g$, then $h$ is constant. To this end, we show by induction on $n$ that whenever $x \in [0, r+s]$ and $x \le ns$, we have $h(x) = h(0)$. The base case $n=0$ is trivial. For the inductive step, if $x \le s$, then $f(0,x) = 0$ and $g(0,x) = x$, so $h(0) = h(x)$. Otherwise, we have $x-s \in [0,r]$ and $x-s \le (n-1)s$, so by inductive hypothesis $h(x-s) = h(0)$. Also, $f(x-s, s) = x-s$ and $g(x-s, s) = x$, so $h(x-s) = h(x)$, completing the induction. With this established, the desired result follows from the case $n := \lceil r/s \rceil + 1$.

On the other hand, $\lim X_n \simeq [0, 1] \times \{ 0 \}$; $\lim Y_n \simeq [0, 1]$; and $\lim f_n = \lim g_n$, $(x, 0) \mapsto x$. Thus, the coequalizer of $\lim f_n$ and $\lim g_n$ is $[0, 1]$, showing that the limit does not preserve this coequalizer.

special_objects:
initial object:
description: empty space
terminal object:
description: singleton space
coproducts:
description: Stone-Čech compactification of the disjoint union with the disjoint union topology (in the finite case, the disjoint union is already compact Hausdorff so Stone-Čech compactification is not necessary)
products:
description: direct product with the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology" target="_blank">product topology</a> (which is compact by the Tychonoff product theorem)

special_morphisms:
isomorphisms:
description: homeomorphisms
reason: This is easy.
monomorphisms:
description: injective continuous maps (which are automatically closed embeddings)
reason: 'For the non-trivial direction, the forgetful functor to $\Set$ is representable (by the terminal object), hence preserves monomorphisms. To prove the parenthetical remark, given an injective continuous function $f : X \to Y$ between compact Hausdorff spaces, the image of $f$ is a closed subset. Also, the induced map from $X$ to $\im(f)$ with the subspace topology is a bijective continuous map between compact Hausdorff spaces, so it is a homeomorphism.'
epimorphisms:
description: surjective continuous maps (which are automatically quotient maps)
reason: For the non-trivial direction, and for a proof of the parenthetical remark, see the proof above that $\CompHaus$ is epi-regular.
regular monomorphisms:
description: same as monomorphisms
reason: This is because the category is mono-regular.
regular epimorphisms:
description: same as epimorphisms
reason: This is because the category is epi-regular.
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion databases/catdat/data/categories/Haus.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ tags:
related_categories:
- Met_c
- Top
- CompHaus

satisfied_properties:
- property_id: locally small
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -53,7 +54,10 @@ unsatisfied_properties:
reason: 'It is shown in <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1255678">MSE/1255678</a> that $\IQ \times - : \Top \to \Top$ does not preserve sequential colimits (so that it cannot be a left adjoint). The same example also works in $\Haus$: Surely $\IQ$ is Hausdorff, $X_n$ is Hausdorff, as is their colimit $X$, and the colimit (taken in $\Top$) of the $X_n \times \IQ$ admits a bijective continuous map to a Hausdorff space, therefore is also Hausdorff, meaning it is also the colimit taken in $\Haus$.'

- property_id: filtered-colimit-stable monomorphisms
reason: 'The proof is similar to <a href="/category/Met">$\Met$</a>. For $n \geq 1$ let $X_n$ be the pushout of $[-1/n,+1/n] \hookrightarrow \IR$ with itself. That is, $X_n$ is the union of two lines $\IR \times \{1\}$ and $\IR \times \{2\}$ where we identify $(x,1) \equiv (x,2)$ when $|x| \leq 1/n$. Then $X_n$ is Hausdorff, and there is a canonical surjective continuous map $X_n \to X_{n+1}$. The colimit in $\Top$ is the union of two lines where we identify $(x,1) \equiv (x,2)$ when $|x| \leq 1/n$ for some $n$, i.e. when $x \neq 0$. This is the line with the double origin, which is not Hausdorff. Its Hausdorff reflection is the line $\IR$ where all points of both lines are identified, and it provides the colimit in $\Haus$. Now, the injective continuous maps $\{1,2\} \to X_n$, $i \mapsto (0,i)$ (where $\{1,2\}$ is discrete) become the constant map $0 : \{1,2\} \to \IR$ in the colimit, which is no monomorphism.'
reason: |-
The proof is similar to <a href="/category/Met">$\Met$</a>. For $n \geq 1$ let $X_n$ be the pushout of
$$(-\infty, -1/n] \cup [1/n, \infty) \hookrightarrow \IR$$
with itself. That is, $X_n$ is the union of two lines $\IR \times \{1\}$ and $\IR \times \{2\}$ where we identify $(x,1) \equiv (x,2)$ when $|x| \geq 1/n$. Then $X_n$ is Hausdorff, and there is a canonical surjective continuous map $X_n \to X_{n+1}$. The colimit in $\Top$ is the union of two lines where we identify $(x,1) \equiv (x,2)$ when $|x| \geq 1/n$ for some $n$, i.e. when $x \neq 0$. This is the line with the double origin, which is not Hausdorff. Its Hausdorff reflection is the line $\IR$ where all points of both lines are identified, and it provides the colimit in $\Haus$. Now, the injective continuous maps $\{1,2\} \to X_n$, $i \mapsto (0,i)$ (where $\{1,2\}$ is discrete) become the constant map $0 : \{1,2\} \to \IR$ in the colimit, which is not a monomorphism.

- property_id: balanced
reason: The inclusion $\IQ \hookrightarrow \IR$ is a counterexample; it is an epimorphism since $\IQ$ is dense in $\IR$.
Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions databases/catdat/data/category-implications/congruences.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,16 @@
reason: This holds by definition of a regular category.
is_equivalence: false

- id: regular_well-powered_well-copowered
assumptions:
- regular
- epi-regular
- well-powered
conclusions:
- well-copowered
reason: The regularity condition gives a bijection between the collection of quotients of $X$ and the collection of effective congruences on $X$, where the latter is a subcollection of the collection of subobjects of $X\times X$.
is_equivalence: false

- id: congruence_quotients_are_reflexive_coequalizers
assumptions:
- reflexive coequalizers
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions databases/catdat/data/macros.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
\PMet: \mathbf{PMet}
\Top: \mathbf{Top}
\Haus: \mathbf{Haus}
\CompHaus: \mathbf{CompHaus}
\sSet: \mathbf{sSet}
\Man: \mathbf{Man}
\LRS: \mathbf{LRS}
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions static/pdf/.gitignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# Files from Latex Workshop
*.aux
*.bbl
*.blg
*.fdb_latexmk
*.fls
*.log
Expand Down
68 changes: 68 additions & 0 deletions static/pdf/comphaus_copresentable.bib
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
@misc{marra2020characterisationcategorycompacthausdorff,
title={A characterisation of the category of compact {H}ausdorff spaces},
author={Vincenzo Marra and Luca Reggio},
year={2020},
eprint={1808.09738},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={math.CT},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09738},
}
@article{HUSEK2019251,
title = {Factorization and local presentability in topological and uniform spaces},
journal = {Topology and its Applications},
volume = {259},
pages = {251-266},
year = {2019},
note = {William Wistar Comfort (1933-2016): In Memoriam},
issn = {0166-8641},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2019.02.033},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166864119300513},
author = {M. Hušek and J. Rosický},
keywords = {Realcompact space, Factorization, Locally presentable category},
abstract = {Investigating dual local presentability of some topological and uniform classes, a new procedure is developed for factorization of maps defined on subspaces of products and a new characterization of local presentability is produced. The factorization is related to large cardinals and deals, mainly, with realcompact spaces. Instead of factorization of maps on colimits, local presentability is characterized by means of factorization on products.}
}
@article{Marra_2017,
title={Stone duality above dimension zero: Axiomatising the algebraic theory of {C(X)}},
volume={307},
ISSN={0001-8708},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.11.012},
DOI={10.1016/j.aim.2016.11.012},
journal={Advances in Mathematics},
publisher={Elsevier BV},
author={Marra, Vincenzo and Reggio, Luca},
year={2017},
month=Feb, pages={253–287} }
@article{Isb82,
title = {Generating the algebraic theory of {C(X)}},
journal = {Algebra Universalis},
volume = {15 (2)},
pages = {153-155},
year = {1982},
author = {Isbell, J.R.}
}
@inproceedings{Dus69,
title = {Variations on {B}eck's tripleability criterion},
series = {Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar III},
editor = {MacLane, S.},
author = {Duskin, J.},
pages = {74-129},
year = {1969},
publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg}
}
@article{Hoff18,
title = {Generating the algebraic theory of {C(X)}: The case of partially ordered compact spaces},
journal = {Theory and Applications of Categories},
author = {Hoffman, Dirk and Neves, Renato and Nora, Pedro},
pages = {276-295},
year = {2018},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
url = {http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/12/33-12.pdf}}
@article{GU71,
title = {Lokal pr\"asentierbare {K}ategorien},
author = {P. Gabriel and F. Ulmer},
journal = {Lecture Notes in Mathematics},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag, Berlin},
volume = {221},
year = {1971}
}
Binary file added static/pdf/comphaus_copresentable.pdf
Binary file not shown.
Loading