Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
47 lines (35 loc) · 2.57 KB

File metadata and controls

47 lines (35 loc) · 2.57 KB

SecAI OS Security Hardening Roadmap

Last updated: 2026-05-14

This document is a historical roadmap for milestones M12 through M24. Those milestones are now implemented and tracked in the current Security Status document. Keep this page for context only; do not use it as the source of truth for current security posture.


Current Status

Milestone Area Current Status Primary Verification
M12 Continuous model integrity monitoring Implemented Registry verify endpoints, integrity timer, UI verify-all flow
M13 Hash-chained audit logs Implemented Audit verification endpoints and verify-release.sh checks
M14 Local UI authentication Implemented Scrypt passphrase setup/login/session tests
M15 Vault auto-lock Implemented Vault watchdog tests and UI/API lock controls
M16 Advanced process isolation Implemented Systemd hardening, seccomp profiles, Landlock policy
M17 Secure Boot + measured boot Implemented MOK tooling, TPM2 sealing, boot verification docs
M18 Memory protection Implemented Swap/zswap/core dump/mlock/TEE tests
M19 Traffic analysis protection Implemented Padding, timing jitter, dummy traffic tests
M20 Differential privacy for search Implemented Decoy query, uniqueness, and batching tests
M21 Clipboard isolation Implemented Clipboard isolation tests and service hardening
M22 Canary/tripwire system Implemented Canary placement and tamper-detection tests
M23 Emergency wipe Implemented Three-level panic tests
M24 Update verification + rollback Implemented Cosign/rpm-ostree verification and rollback tests

The broader implementation status is maintained in:


Historical Design Intent

The original M12-M24 roadmap focused on closing these risks:

  • Detect model tampering after promotion.
  • Make audit logs tamper-evident.
  • Require local UI authentication and vault auto-lock.
  • Harden process, filesystem, memory, network, and clipboard boundaries.
  • Add measured boot, update verification, rollback, canaries, and emergency wipe.
  • Preserve user privacy by avoiding metadata in generated outputs unless required for trust verification.

Those design goals remain active project invariants, but implementation details have moved into the component docs, policy schema, tests, and operations guides.