-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
[Klaud Cold] Update dsv4-fp4-b300-vllm vLLM image to v0.21.0 #1456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 The new perf-changelog entry contains the parenthetical "(18d old)" describing the prior image tag, which is anchored to the PR creation date and becomes meaningless when read later. All other entries in the file use the plain "Update X image from vA to vB" form — recommend dropping the "(18d old)" so this entry matches established style and remains useful as a permanent record.
Extended reasoning...
What's the issue
At
perf-changelog.yaml:2636, the new entry reads:The
(18d old)parenthetical is an ephemeral relative-time annotation — it was true on the PR creation date (2026-05-17) but degrades immediately afterward. A reader looking at the changelog months from now has no implicit anchor for what "18d old" was measured from.Why this conflicts with established style
Grepping for relative-time annotations across
perf-changelog.yamlturns up exactly one match — the new entry from this PR. Every other entry, including the most recent neighbors, uses the bare form:"Update vLLM image from v0.15.1 to v0.20.2""Update vLLM ROCm image from v0.18.0 to v0.21.0"None of them include a freshness hint for the prior tag. The perf-changelog is a permanent record of recipe changes; ephemeral commentary anchored to a moving "now" doesn't fit that purpose.
Addressing the refutation
One verifier argued the absolute date can always be recovered from the
pr-linkfield, so the staleness framing is overblown. That's true — a reader can click through to GitHub to recover the date. But that's not really the point: the entry is inconsistent with every other entry in the file, and "18d old" provides no information that the rest of the description (specific version strings) doesn't already convey. The cost to drop it is zero, and the result matches the file's established convention.Impact
None functionally — this is purely a documentation/style issue. The changelog is human-readable metadata; it doesn't affect config parsing, image resolution, or sweep behavior. Flagging as nit accordingly.
Step-by-step proof
perf-changelog.yamlat line 2636 — see"Update vLLM image from v0.20.0-cu130 (18d old) to v0.21.0"."Update vLLM ROCm image from v0.18.0 to v0.21.0"(no relative-time hint)."Update vLLM image from v0.15.1 to v0.20.2"(no relative-time hint).[0-9]+d (old|ago)— only the new entry matches.Suggested fix
Drop the parenthetical so the entry reads:
- "Update vLLM image from v0.20.0-cu130 to v0.21.0"