|
1 | | -function [E, Eo] = five_point_algorithm( pts1, pts2, K1, K2 ) |
| 1 | +function [E_all, R_all, t_all, Eo_all] = five_point_algorithm( pts1, pts2, K1, K2 ) |
2 | 2 | %FIVE_POINT_ALGORITHM Given five points matches between two images, and the |
3 | 3 | % intrinsic parameters of each camera. Estimate the essential matrix E, the |
4 | 4 | % rotation matrix R and translation vector t, between both images. This |
5 | 5 | % algorithm is based on the method described by David Nister in "An |
6 | 6 | % Efficient Solution to the Five-Point Relative Pose Problem" |
7 | 7 | % DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2004.17 |
8 | 8 | % |
9 | | -% E = FIVE_POINT_ALGORITHM(pts1, pts2, K1, K2) returns the Essential matrix |
10 | | -% enforcing the restriction U*diag([1 1 0])*V' |
| 9 | +% E = FIVE_POINT_ALGORITHM(pts1, pts2, K1, K2) returns in E all the valid |
| 10 | +% Essential matrix solutions for the five point correspondence. If you |
| 11 | +% don't need the R and t, use this version as it avoids computing |
| 12 | +% unnecessary results. |
| 13 | +% |
| 14 | +% [E_all, R_all, t_all, Eo_all] = FIVE_POINT_ALGORITHM(pts1, pts2, K1, K2) |
| 15 | +% also returns in R_all and t_all all the rotation matrices and translation |
| 16 | +% vectors of camera 2 for the different essential matrices, such that a 3D |
| 17 | +% point in camera 1 reference frame can be transformed into the camera 2 |
| 18 | +% reference frame through p_2 = R{n}*p_1 + t{n}. Eo_all is the essential |
| 19 | +% matrix before the imposing the structure U*diag([1 1 0])*V'. It should |
| 20 | +% help get a better feeling on the accuracy of the solution. All these |
| 21 | +% return values a nx1 cell arrays. |
11 | 22 | % |
12 | | -% [E, Eo] = FIVE_POINT_ALGORITHM(pts1, pts2, K1, K2) returns the Essential |
13 | | -% matrix enforcing the restriction U*diag([1 1 0])*V', and original matrix |
14 | | -% computed by the method in Eo. |
15 | 23 | % |
16 | 24 | % Arguments: |
17 | 25 | % pts1, pts2 - assumed to have dimension 2x5 and of equal size. |
18 | 26 | % K1, K2 - 3x3 intrinsic parameters of cameras 1 and 2 respectively |
19 | | -% |
20 | | -% Returns: |
21 | | -% E - U*diag([1 1 0])*V' |
22 | | -% Eo - E as it is estimated originally |
23 | 27 | % |
24 | | -% Known Issues: |
25 | | -% The algorithm is still incomplete. I'm releasing it at this early stage |
26 | | -% because it already provides proper estimates of the essential matrix. |
27 | | -% Although there is more than one solution, I'm currently only returning |
28 | | -% the first. I still need to figure out how to select the "best" if such |
29 | | -% exists. |
| 28 | +% Know Issues: |
| 29 | +% - R and t computation is done assuming perfect point correspondence. |
30 | 30 | % |
31 | 31 | % TODO: |
32 | | -% - Extract R and t from E |
33 | | -% - Provide example cases. |
| 32 | +% - Extract R and t without perfect point correspondence |
| 33 | +% - Augment example cases. |
34 | 34 | % - Implement the variant with 5 points over 3 images |
35 | 35 | % - Handle more than 5 points |
36 | 36 | % |
37 | 37 | % Author: Sergio Agostinho - sergio(dot)r(dot)agostinho(at)gmail(dot)com |
38 | 38 | % Date: Feb 2015 |
39 | | -% Version: 0.8 |
| 39 | +% Last modified: Mar 2015 |
| 40 | +% Version: 0.9 |
40 | 41 | % Repo: https://github.com/SergioRAgostinho/five_point_algorithm |
41 | | -% Feel free to provide feedback or aid in the development. |
| 42 | +% Feel free to provide feedback or contribute. |
42 | 43 |
|
43 | 44 | if ~all(size(pts1) == [2,5]) || ~all(size(pts2) == [2,5]) |
44 | 45 | error('five_point_algorithm:wrong_dimensions','pts1 and pts2 must be of size 2x5'); |
|
216 | 217 | e_val = eig([-n_row_scaled(2:end); |
217 | 218 | eye(9), zeros(9,1)]); |
218 | 219 |
|
219 | | -%Select the first real root |
220 | | -%TODO: Find if there's a "best" solution |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | +m = 0; |
221 | 222 | for n = 1:10 |
222 | 223 | if ~isreal(e_val(n)) |
223 | 224 | continue |
224 | 225 | end |
225 | 226 |
|
| 227 | + m = m + 1; |
| 228 | +end |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +R_all = cell(m,1); |
| 231 | +t_all = cell(m,1); |
| 232 | +E_all = cell(m,1); |
| 233 | +Eo_all = cell(m,1); |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +m = 1; |
| 236 | +for n = 1:10 |
| 237 | + if ~isreal(e_val(n)) |
| 238 | + continue |
| 239 | + end |
226 | 240 | z = e_val(n); |
227 | | - break |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | + %Backsubstition |
| 243 | + p_z6 = [z^6; z^5; z^4; z^3; z^2; z; 1]; |
| 244 | + p_z7 = [z^7; p_z6]; |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | + x = (p_1*p_z7)/(p_3*p_z6); |
| 247 | + y = (p_2*p_z7)/(p_3*p_z6); |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | + Eo = x*Xmat + y*Ymat + z*Zmat + Wmat; |
| 250 | + Eo_all{m} = Eo; |
| 251 | + [U,~,V] = svd(Eo); |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | + |
| 254 | + E = U*diag([1 1 0])*V'; |
| 255 | + E_all{m} = E; |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | + %stop here if nothing else is required to be computed |
| 258 | + if nargout < 2 |
| 259 | + m = m + 1; |
| 260 | + continue |
| 261 | + end |
| 262 | + |
| 263 | + %check determinan signs |
| 264 | + if(det(U) < 0) |
| 265 | + U(:,3) = -U(:,3); |
| 266 | + end |
| 267 | + |
| 268 | + if (det(V) < 0) |
| 269 | + V(:,3) = -V(:,3); |
| 270 | + end |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | + %Extracting R and t from E |
| 273 | + D = [0 1 0; |
| 274 | + -1 0 0; |
| 275 | + 0 0 1]; |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | + q_1 = q1(:,1); |
| 278 | + q_2 = q2(:,1); |
| 279 | + |
| 280 | + |
| 281 | + for n = 1:4 |
| 282 | + switch(n) |
| 283 | + case 1 |
| 284 | + t = U(:,3); |
| 285 | + R = U*D*V'; |
| 286 | + case 2 |
| 287 | + t = -U(:,3); |
| 288 | + R = U*D*V'; |
| 289 | + case 3 |
| 290 | + t = U(:,3); |
| 291 | + R = U*D'*V'; |
| 292 | + case 4 |
| 293 | + t = -U(:,3); |
| 294 | + R = U*D'*V'; |
| 295 | + end |
| 296 | + |
| 297 | + %Cheirality (points in front of the camera) constraint assuming perfect |
| 298 | + %point correspondence |
| 299 | + a = E'*q_2; |
| 300 | + b = cross_vec3(q_1, [a(1:2); 0]); |
| 301 | + c = cross_vec3(q_2, diag([1 1 0])*E*q_1); |
| 302 | + d = cross_vec3(a, b); |
| 303 | + |
| 304 | + P = [R t]; |
| 305 | + C = P'*c; |
| 306 | + Q = [d*C(4); -d(1:3)'*C(1:3)]; |
| 307 | + |
| 308 | + %Cheirality test |
| 309 | + |
| 310 | + %behind the 1st camera |
| 311 | + if (Q(3)*Q(4) < 0) |
| 312 | + continue |
| 313 | + end |
| 314 | + |
| 315 | + %behind the 2nd camera |
| 316 | + c_2 = P*Q; |
| 317 | + if (c_2(3)*Q(4) < 0) |
| 318 | + continue |
| 319 | + end |
| 320 | + |
| 321 | + R_all{m} = R; |
| 322 | + t_all{m} = t; |
| 323 | + break |
| 324 | + end |
| 325 | + m = m + 1; |
228 | 326 | end |
229 | 327 |
|
230 | | -%Backsubstition |
231 | | -p_z6 = [z^6; z^5; z^4; z^3; z^2; z; 1]; |
232 | | -p_z7 = [z^7; p_z6]; |
233 | | - |
234 | | -x = (p_1*p_z7)/(p_3*p_z6); |
235 | | -y = (p_2*p_z7)/(p_3*p_z6); |
236 | | - |
237 | | -Eo = x*Xmat + y*Ymat + z*Zmat + Wmat; |
238 | | -[U,~,V] = svd(Eo); |
239 | | - |
240 | | - |
241 | | -E = U*diag([1 1 0])*V'; |
242 | | - |
243 | | -% if nargout < 3 |
244 | | -% return |
245 | | -% end |
246 | | - |
247 | | -% %check determinan signs |
248 | | -% if(det(U) < 0) |
249 | | -% U(:,3) = -U(:,3); |
250 | | -% end |
251 | | -% |
252 | | -% if (det(V) < 0) |
253 | | -% V(:,3) = -V(:,3); |
254 | | -% end |
255 | | -% |
256 | | -% %Extracting R and t from E |
257 | | -% D = [0 1 0; |
258 | | -% -1 0 0; |
259 | | -% 0 0 1]; |
260 | | -% |
261 | | -% for n = 1:4 |
262 | | -% switch(n) |
263 | | -% case 1 |
264 | | -% t = U(:,3); |
265 | | -% R = U*D*V'; |
266 | | -% case 2 |
267 | | -% t = -U(:,3); |
268 | | -% R = U*D*V'; |
269 | | -% case 3 |
270 | | -% t = U(:,3); |
271 | | -% R = U*D'*V'; |
272 | | -% case 4 |
273 | | -% t = -U(:,3); |
274 | | -% R = U*D'*V'; |
275 | | -% end |
276 | | -% |
277 | | -% |
278 | | -% |
279 | | -% end |
280 | 328 | end |
281 | 329 |
|
| 330 | +function out = cross_vec3(u, v) |
| 331 | +%CROSS_VEC Function to compute the cross product of two 3D column vectors. |
| 332 | +%The default MATLAB implementation is simply too slow. |
| 333 | + |
| 334 | +out = [ u(2)*v(3) - u(3)*v(2); |
| 335 | + u(3)*v(1) - u(1)*v(3); |
| 336 | + u(1)*v(2) - u(2)*v(1)]; |
| 337 | +end |
282 | 338 |
|
283 | 339 | function po = pz6pz4(p1, p2) |
284 | 340 | %PZ4PZ3 Function responsible for multiplying a 6th order z polynomial p1 |
|
0 commit comments