Why choose drop companion_tag instead of just simply convert it? Are there some reasons I don't consider? #635
Answered
by
Serial-ATA
Linxuanhua1
asked this question in
Q&A
-
|
Lines 242 to 250 in f3fcfd0 For example, just simply convert Because most of softwares do the same thing, such as mp3tag、musicbrainz picard and foobar |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
Serial-ATA
Mar 20, 2026
Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
|
The companion tag only holds the items that don't have a generic conversion. It even logs a warning saying that the tag will no longer hold those format-specific items: log::warn!("Discarding format-specific items due to remap"); If you start with an ID3v2 tag and convert to another format, it wouldn't make sense to keep those ID3v2-specific items around. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Do you mean what fields would be in the companion tag? That's any field that doesn't have an
ItemKey, likeRelativeVolumeAdjustmentFrame.