Skip to content

Update addContentType description in JSON schema#10753

Merged
andrewconnell merged 4 commits intoSharePoint:mainfrom
sparkitect:patch-2
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

Update addContentType description in JSON schema#10753
andrewconnell merged 4 commits intoSharePoint:mainfrom
sparkitect:patch-2

Conversation

@sparkitect
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sparkitect sparkitect commented Apr 3, 2026

Category

  • Content fix
  • New article

Related issues

none

What's in this Pull Request?

Expanded the description of the addContentType subaction to include published enterprise content types and removed the note about unsupported enterprise content types.

Expanded the description of the addContentType function to include published enterprise content types and removed the note about unsupported enterprise content types.
Update addContentType description in JSON schema
@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PoliCheck Scan Report

The following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans.

✅ No issues found

More information about PoliCheck

Information: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term
For any questions: Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides or post your question in the Learn support channel.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit a75bdac:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/declarative-customization/site-design-json-schema.md ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@andrewconnell andrewconnell added the pr:in-review Actively reviewing pull request label Apr 6, 2026
@andrewconnell andrewconnell self-assigned this Apr 6, 2026
@andrewconnell andrewconnell self-requested a review April 6, 2026 16:06
- add bold/inline code formatting to filenames, verb
  references, and property names for consistency
- fix typo and grammar issues
- revert ms.date to original value
@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PoliCheck Scan Report

The following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans.

✅ No issues found

More information about PoliCheck

Information: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term
For any questions: Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides or post your question in the Learn support channel.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 28d265a:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/declarative-customization/site-design-json-schema.md ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@andrewconnell andrewconnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks... reviewed your changes & made a bunch of other fixes that had nothing to do with your update, but I tack'ed them on (typos, formatting, etc).

@andrewconnell andrewconnell added pr:ready-to-merge Ready to merge PR and removed pr:in-review Actively reviewing pull request labels Apr 6, 2026
@andrewconnell andrewconnell self-requested a review April 6, 2026 16:41
@andrewconnell andrewconnell merged commit ea00020 into SharePoint:main Apr 6, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr:ready-to-merge Ready to merge PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants