Skip to content

refactor(aggregation): Make utilitary functions public#307

Merged
ValerianRey merged 3 commits intomainfrom
make-utilitary-functions-public
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

refactor(aggregation): Make utilitary functions public#307
ValerianRey merged 3 commits intomainfrom
make-utilitary-functions-public

Conversation

@PierreQuinton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@PierreQuinton PierreQuinton added package: aggregation cc: refactor Conventional commit type for any refactoring, not user-facing, and not typing or perf improvements labels Apr 8, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/torchjd/aggregation/_dual_cone_utils.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/torchjd/aggregation/_pref_vector_utils.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/torchjd/aggregation/aligned_mtl.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/torchjd/aggregation/config.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/torchjd/aggregation/dualproj.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/torchjd/aggregation/upgrad.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@PierreQuinton PierreQuinton changed the title Make utilitary functions public refactor(aggregation): Make utilitary functions of public Apr 8, 2025
@PierreQuinton PierreQuinton changed the title refactor(aggregation): Make utilitary functions of public refactor(aggregation): Make utilitary functions public Apr 8, 2025
@ValerianRey ValerianRey merged commit 739757d into main Apr 8, 2025
15 checks passed
@ValerianRey ValerianRey deleted the make-utilitary-functions-public branch April 8, 2025 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cc: refactor Conventional commit type for any refactoring, not user-facing, and not typing or perf improvements package: aggregation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants