fix(DATAGO-134417): bump litellm, openai, pydantic, python-dotenv for…#1482
Draft
rudraneel-chakraborty wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
fix(DATAGO-134417): bump litellm, openai, pydantic, python-dotenv for…#1482rudraneel-chakraborty wants to merge 1 commit into
rudraneel-chakraborty wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
… security vulnerabilities
|
✅ FOSSA Guard: Vulnerability (
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… security vulnerabilities
What is the purpose of this change?
Fixes 3 security vulnerabilities in litellm==1.83.0 (SQL injection, SSTI, command execution) that are blocking FOSSA.
How was this change implemented?
Bumped litellm to 1.83.14 in pyproject.toml and regenerated uv.lock.
Required co-bumps:
all driven by litellm's transitive dependency constraints.
Key Design Decisions (optional - delete if not applicable)
NA
How was this change tested?
Is there anything the reviewers should focus on/be aware of?