Skip to content

feat: Introduce zuul job for building docs - #312

Closed
gtema wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
zuul
Closed

feat: Introduce zuul job for building docs#312
gtema wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
zuul

Conversation

@gtema

@gtema gtema commented Apr 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@gtema

gtema commented Apr 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck

@gtema

gtema commented Apr 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck

@gtema

gtema commented Apr 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck

@gtema
gtema force-pushed the zuul branch 2 times, most recently from 417725d to b530f7f Compare April 30, 2025 11:13
@gtema
gtema marked this pull request as draft May 2, 2025 08:38
Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov@gmail.com>
@gtema

gtema commented May 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@garloff Now the build looks okay with a workaround proposed in facebook/docusaurus#448 (comment) Replacing the baseURL with the Zuul url is not trivial, since the URL at which document will be published may not be known until the moment of upload.
Other problem I have noticed during this work is #314 where all documents pulled from somewhere else introduce broken links which cannot be caught. The "edit this page" functionality is best to be disabled as such due to that, but there might be another broken links.

@garloff

garloff commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ah, nice, thanks @gtema .
So we should be able to have local builds with working links and also have validation in zuul, right?

You have marked this as Draft -- wanna mark it as ready for review?

@garloff
garloff requested review from garloff and maxwolfs June 19, 2025 09:01
@fkr fkr closed this Nov 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants