Skip to content

All the client linting fixes,but not part of the base PR. Separated u…#1334

Draft
taoteg wants to merge 5 commits into
task/digital-rocksfrom
task/WC-390-linting-fixes
Draft

All the client linting fixes,but not part of the base PR. Separated u…#1334
taoteg wants to merge 5 commits into
task/digital-rocksfrom
task/WC-390-linting-fixes

Conversation

@taoteg

@taoteg taoteg commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overview

All the client linting fixes identified in the npm check, but not part of the PR (WC-390) that was pushed. These must also be unresolved in the bae branch (task/digital-rocks) this was spun off of. I separated them out here until we want to merge them (if at all).

Related

Changes

lots of linting on the js/jsx (plus one tsx and one scss) files in the client.

Testing

  1. See lint cjheck against codebase pass.

UI

None.

Notes

None.

taoteg added 5 commits July 8, 2026 22:43
…s. Added the additional methods required to populate the SEO metadata in the templating from the Publication model.
…ck a space thta was mistakenly deleted after the Publication class code block.

@shayanaijaz shayanaijaz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can hold for now. These fixes will be included as part of the bigger DPM Core merge

Base automatically changed from task/WC-390-DPMP-SEO to task/digital-rocks July 14, 2026 01:55
@taoteg
taoteg marked this pull request as draft July 15, 2026 15:17
@taoteg
taoteg removed the request for review from jarosenb July 15, 2026 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants