Newly added FurnR double beds have small issue that their double variant is much narrower from FurnM ones:
While having slightly narrower shape is understandable, this means that they can't even store two pillows near each other, and their footprint is somewhat too different. In a sense, it is hard to distinguish them from single beds at first look. I think they are something in between 1.3x-1.5x width of regular bed.
I'd suggest widening them to similar width as FurnM beds have (can differ slightly of course, but this width would be preferrable).
Meshes: hf/f/hf_furn_r_bed01*.nif / hf/f/hf_furn_r_bed02*.nif / hf/f/hf_furn_r_bed03*.nif (more-less corresponding single beds are 04/05/06)
Newly added FurnR double beds have small issue that their double variant is much narrower from FurnM ones:
While having slightly narrower shape is understandable, this means that they can't even store two pillows near each other, and their footprint is somewhat too different. In a sense, it is hard to distinguish them from single beds at first look. I think they are something in between 1.3x-1.5x width of regular bed.
I'd suggest widening them to similar width as FurnM beds have (can differ slightly of course, but this width would be preferrable).
Meshes:
hf/f/hf_furn_r_bed01*.nif/hf/f/hf_furn_r_bed02*.nif/hf/f/hf_furn_r_bed03*.nif(more-less corresponding single beds are 04/05/06)