-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
1587 fix issue with simple fields on update form #1589
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jchate6
wants to merge
6
commits into
version-3-0-alpha
Choose a base branch
from
1587-fix-issue-with-simple-fields-on-update-form
base: version-3-0-alpha
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
621af6f
add simple fields to update view context
jchate6 913c7b6
add other details to context
jchate6 3775d86
fix docs indentation
jchate6 ae7970a
update dataservice docs
jchate6 7848b77
add documentation for aliases
jchate6 db538e5
Merge branch 'version-3-0-alpha' into 1587-fix-issue-with-simple-fiel…
jchate6 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why would the form not have as simple partial, but also have simple fields?
I trust that this works, but it just reads a little strange.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I describe this in the docs but I should definitely add a comment here.
Basically, there is a basic partial that takes the fields in
simple_fieldsand makes a super basic form. OR you can can make a simple partial that does whatever you want. So if no partial is given, but there are simple fields we will just use those in the built in default partial.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One would not necessarily expect there to be BOTH a
simple_fieldsand a user madesimple_partial, since the user made simple partial could be much more specific to the dataservice's form fields.