Skip to content

[WIP] HTM-1852 | HTM-1964: Upgrade to GeoTools 35.0 and re-instate GeoJSON extract#1616

Draft
mprins wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
HTM-1852_geotools-35.x
Draft

[WIP] HTM-1852 | HTM-1964: Upgrade to GeoTools 35.0 and re-instate GeoJSON extract#1616
mprins wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
HTM-1852_geotools-35.x

Conversation

@mprins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mprins mprins commented Feb 27, 2026

HTM-1852 Powered by Pull Request Badge
HTM-1964

expected to fail until following are addressed

@mprins mprins self-assigned this Feb 27, 2026
@mprins mprins added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Feb 27, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 2 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 9fd84fd.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

License Issues

pom.xml

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
org.geotools:gt-bom35.0NullUnknown License
org.geotools:gt-excel-writer35.0NullUnknown License
Allowed Licenses: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, ISC, MPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1-only, EPL-2.0, EPL-1.0
Excluded from license check: pkg:maven/org.eclipse.angus/jakarta.mail@2.0.5?type=jar, pkg:maven/jakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api@4.0.0?type=jar

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
maven/org.geotools:gt-bom 35.0 UnknownUnknown
maven/org.geotools:gt-excel-writer 35.0 UnknownUnknown

Scanned Files

  • pom.xml

@mprins mprins changed the title [WIP] HTM-1852: Bump to GeoTools 35-SNAPSHOT and introduce commons-codec [WIP] HTM-1852: Bump to GeoTools 35.x Feb 27, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #1616   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage      78%     78%           
  Complexity    130     130           
======================================
  Files         157     157           
  Lines        7807    7807           
  Branches      715     715           
======================================
  Hits         6012    6012           
  Misses       1382    1382           
  Partials      413     413           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mprins mprins force-pushed the HTM-1852_geotools-35.x branch 6 times, most recently from 9c235a5 to 21624db Compare March 6, 2026 11:23
@mprins mprins force-pushed the HTM-1852_geotools-35.x branch 7 times, most recently from c09ee88 to 35d5cc0 Compare March 13, 2026 19:50
@mprins mprins force-pushed the HTM-1852_geotools-35.x branch from dab63cc to 714fa88 Compare March 23, 2026 13:31
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Mar 30, 2026

Test Results

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 9fd84fd.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@mprins mprins changed the title [WIP] HTM-1852: Bump to GeoTools 35.x [WIP] HTM-1852: Bump to GeoTools 35.0 May 11, 2026
@mprins mprins force-pushed the HTM-1852_geotools-35.x branch from 62fcdc4 to 9ef63d7 Compare May 12, 2026 09:41
@mprins mprins changed the title [WIP] HTM-1852: Bump to GeoTools 35.0 [WIP] HTM-1852 | HTM-1964: Upgrade to GeoTools 35.0 and re-instate GeoJSON extract May 12, 2026
@mprins mprins force-pushed the HTM-1852_geotools-35.x branch from 9ef63d7 to e798446 Compare May 12, 2026 10:58
@mprins mprins force-pushed the HTM-1852_geotools-35.x branch from e798446 to 9fd84fd Compare May 12, 2026 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant