Status: Draft Last Updated: 2026-06-09 Owner: TBD
This task plan breaks down H4, H5, and H6 implementation into independently testable tickets. Each ticket is designed to be 30-120 minutes of work with clear acceptance criteria.
- H4 depends on: H3 complete (ecosystem trust foundations)
- H5 depends on: H4 complete (cost attribution needed for evidence bundles)
- H6 depends on: H5 complete (eval-gated releases needed for stable packages)
- Goal: Create base TUI screen layout for control plane cockpit
- Scope: Tab navigation, screen framework, basic layout
- Inputs: Existing TUI foundation, design mockups
- Outputs: TUI cockpit screen with navigation tabs
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- TUI launches with cockpit screen
- Navigation tabs (Workflows, Approvals, Costs, Memory, Background) are visible
- Screen layout matches design mockups
- Tests: TUI smoke test, navigation test
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/tui/__init__.py,teaagent/tui/cockpit.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement workflows screen showing active multi-tenant workflows
- Scope: Workflow listing, tenant filtering, status display
- Inputs: Run store, tenant metadata
- Outputs: Workflows screen with real-time workflow data
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Active workflows displayed in table format
- Tenant filtering works correctly
- Status updates in real-time (< 500ms)
- Tests: Workflow screen integration test
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/tui/cockpit.py,teaagent/run_store.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement approvals screen for pending workflow actions
- Scope: Pending approvals queue, approve/reject actions, tenant context
- Inputs: Approval queue, policy engine
- Outputs: Approvals screen with action management
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-001-01, TASK-H4-002-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Pending approvals displayed with tenant context
- Approve/reject actions work correctly
- Policy violations are clearly shown
- Tests: Approvals screen integration test
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/tui/cockpit.py,teaagent/approval_manager.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement cost dashboard showing per-tenant cost allocation
- Scope: Cost attribution display, cost trends, budget alerts
- Inputs: Cost tracking data, budget envelopes
- Outputs: Cost dashboard with real-time cost data
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-001-01, TASK-H4-004-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Costs displayed by tenant and workflow
- Cost trends visible over time
- Budget alerts trigger correctly
- Tests: Cost dashboard integration test
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/tui/cockpit.py,teaagent/budget.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement memory registry inspection screen
- Scope: Active memory display, memory metadata, quarantine status
- Inputs: Memory catalog, memory metadata
- Outputs: Memory registry screen with inspection capabilities
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Active memory entries displayed
- Memory metadata (scope, source, confidence) visible
- Quarantined memory clearly labeled
- Tests: Memory registry integration test
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/tui/cockpit.py,teaagent/memory.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement background run lifecycle management screen
- Scope: Background run listing, attach/resume/stop actions
- Inputs: Background run store, worker status
- Outputs: Background lifecycle screen with management actions
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-001-01, TASK-H4-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Background runs displayed with status
- Attach/resume/stop actions work correctly
- Progress indicators update in real-time
- Tests: Background lifecycle integration test
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/tui/cockpit.py,teaagent/background.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Create policy engine for collaboration rules
- Scope: Policy definition, policy storage, policy evaluation
- Inputs: Policy schema, role definitions
- Outputs: Policy engine with basic evaluation
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Policies can be defined and stored
- Policy evaluation returns allow/deny decisions
- Policy conflicts resolved with deterministic precedence
- Tests: Policy engine unit tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/policy.py,teaagent/policy_engine.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement role-based access control for agent actions
- Scope: Role definitions, role assignment, permission checks
- Inputs: User roles, action permissions
- Outputs: RBAC system with permission enforcement
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-002-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Roles can be defined and assigned
- Permission checks enforce role boundaries
- Role changes take effect immediately
- Tests: RBAC integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/rbac.py,teaagent/policy.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement consensus validation for collaborative runs
- Scope: Consensus rules, vote tracking, consensus decision
- Inputs: Policy requirements, user votes
- Outputs: Consensus validation system
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-002-01, TASK-H4-002-02
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Consensus rules (e.g., 2-of-3) enforced
- Vote tracking accurate
- Consensus decisions trigger actions automatically
- Tests: Consensus validation integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/consensus.py,teaagent/policy.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement policy-based routing for collaborative runs
- Scope: Routing rules, policy-aware dispatch, routing audit
- Inputs: Policy engine, routing rules
- Outputs: Policy-based routing system
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-002-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Actions routed based on policy rules
- Routing decisions logged for audit
- Policy violations block routing
- Tests: Policy routing integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/router.py,teaagent/policy.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement persistent run state for background tasks
- Scope: Run state serialization, persistence layer, state recovery
- Inputs: Run state, persistence backend
- Outputs: Background run persistence system
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Run state serialized and persisted correctly
- State recovery works after process restart
- State corruption detected and handled
- Tests: Persistence unit tests, recovery integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/background.py,teaagent/persistence.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement cloud gateway for task intake
- Scope: Gateway API, task queue, cloud worker coordination
- Inputs: Task definitions, cloud provider SDK
- Outputs: Cloud task intake gateway
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Tasks submitted via gateway API
- Task queue managed correctly
- Cloud workers coordinate properly
- Tests: Gateway integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/gateway.py,teaagent/cloud.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement background worker lifecycle management
- Scope: Worker startup, health monitoring, worker restart
- Inputs: Worker process, health checks
- Outputs: Background worker lifecycle manager
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Workers start and stop correctly
- Worker health monitored
- Failed workers restarted automatically
- Tests: Worker lifecycle integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/worker.py,teaagent/background.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement recovery from network interruptions
- Scope: Network failure detection, retry logic, state reconciliation
- Inputs: Network status, retry policy
- Outputs: Network interruption recovery system
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Network failures detected
- Retry logic works correctly
- State reconciled after reconnection
- Tests: Network failure simulation tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/recovery.py,teaagent/background.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement cost tracking per tenant
- Scope: Cost allocation by tenant, cost aggregation, cost storage
- Inputs: Cost events, tenant metadata
- Outputs: Per-tenant cost tracking system
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Costs allocated to correct tenant
- Cost aggregation accurate
- Cost storage efficient
- Tests: Cost tracking unit tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/cost.py,teaagent/budget.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement cost envelopes at workflow level
- Scope: Workflow budget definition, envelope enforcement, cost alerts
- Inputs: Workflow definitions, budget limits
- Outputs: Workflow cost envelope system
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-004-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Workflow budgets defined and enforced
- Cost alerts trigger correctly
- Envelope violations block new work
- Tests: Cost envelope integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/cost.py,teaagent/budget.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement cost alerting mechanism
- Scope: Alert thresholds, alert delivery, alert history
- Inputs: Cost data, alert configuration
- Outputs: Cost alerting system
- Dependencies: TASK-H4-004-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Alerts trigger at configured thresholds
- Alerts delivered to correct recipients
- Alert history maintained
- Tests: Alerting integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/alerts.py,teaagent/cost.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Create eval suite framework for automated testing
- Scope: Test discovery, test execution, result aggregation
- Inputs: Test files, test configuration
- Outputs: Eval suite framework
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Tests discovered and executed
- Results aggregated correctly
- Test execution time tracked
- Tests: Framework unit tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/eval.py,scripts/eval_runner.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement prompt change regression tests
- Scope: Prompt test fixtures, response comparison, regression detection
- Inputs: Prompt templates, expected responses
- Outputs: Prompt regression test suite
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Prompt changes tested against fixtures
- Response comparison accurate
- Regressions detected correctly
- Tests: Regression suite integration tests
- Files likely touched:
tests/eval/prompt_regression.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Automate repo-map benchmark in eval suite
- Scope: Benchmark integration, baseline comparison, performance tracking
- Inputs: Existing
scripts/repo_map_benchmark.py - Outputs: Automated repo-map benchmark
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Benchmark runs in eval suite
- Baseline comparison works
- Performance trends tracked
- Tests: Benchmark integration test
- Files likely touched:
scripts/repo_map_benchmark.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement long-session context health tests
- Scope: Long-session fixtures, context drift detection, memory leak tests
- Inputs: Long-session test data
- Outputs: Long-session context health tests
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Long-session scenarios tested
- Context drift detected
- Memory leaks identified
- Tests: Long-session integration tests
- Files likely touched:
tests/eval/long_session.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement scope-creep detection tests
- Scope: Scope boundary tests, creep detection, violation reporting
- Inputs: Scope definitions, test scenarios
- Outputs: Scope-creep detection tests
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Scope boundaries enforced
- Scope creep detected
- Violations reported clearly
- Tests: Scope-creep integration tests
- Files likely touched:
tests/eval/scope_creep.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Integrate eval gates into release pipeline
- Scope: CI integration, gate enforcement, failure handling
- Inputs: CI configuration, eval results
- Outputs: Eval-gated release pipeline
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01 through TASK-H5-001-05
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Eval suite runs in CI
- Release blocked on eval failure
- Failure handling clear
- Tests: CI integration test
- Files likely touched:
.github/workflows/release.yml,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Define evidence bundle schema and structure
- Scope: Bundle format, content types, metadata
- Inputs: Audit data, compliance requirements
- Outputs: Evidence bundle schema
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Bundle schema defined
- Content types specified
- Metadata requirements clear
- Tests: Schema validation tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/evidence/schema.py,api/data-formats.md - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement evidence bundle generation
- Scope: Data collection, bundle assembly, compression
- Inputs: Audit trail, cost data, policy violations
- Outputs: Evidence bundle generator
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-002-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Bundles generated correctly
- All required data included
- Compression efficient
- Tests: Bundle generation tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/evidence/generator.py,teaagent/audit_export.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement cryptographic signing for evidence bundles
- Scope: Signature generation, key management, signature verification
- Inputs: Signing keys, bundle data
- Outputs: Bundle signing system
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-002-02
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Bundles signed correctly
- Signatures verifiable
- Key management secure
- Tests: Signing integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/evidence/signing.py,teaagent/evidence/generator.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement evidence bundle verification
- Scope: Signature verification, integrity checks, validation
- Inputs: Signed bundles, verification keys
- Outputs: Bundle verification system
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-002-03
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Signatures verified correctly
- Integrity checks pass
- Validation errors clear
- Tests: Verification integration tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/evidence/verification.py,teaagent/evidence/signing.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement CLI commands for evidence export and verification
- Scope: Export command, verify command, inspect command
- Inputs: Bundle data, CLI framework
- Outputs: Evidence CLI commands
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-002-02, TASK-H5-002-04
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Export command works
- Verify command works
- Inspect command shows bundle contents
- Tests: CLI command tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/cli.py,teaagent/evidence/cli.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement regression test baseline management
- Scope: Baseline storage, baseline updates, baseline versioning
- Inputs: Test results, baseline data
- Outputs: Baseline management system
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Baselines stored correctly
- Baselines updated safely
- Baseline versioning works
- Tests: Baseline management tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/regression/baseline.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement flaky test detection and quarantine
- Scope: Flakiness detection, quarantine mechanism, quarantine management
- Inputs: Test results, flakiness thresholds
- Outputs: Flaky test detection system
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Flaky tests detected
- Quarantine mechanism works
- Quarantine management clear
- Tests: Flaky test detection tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/regression/flaky.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement regression trend analysis
- Scope: Trend tracking, trend visualization, trend alerts
- Inputs: Historical test results
- Outputs: Regression trend analysis system
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Trends tracked over time
- Trends visualized clearly
- Trend alerts trigger correctly
- Tests: Trend analysis tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/regression/trends.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement exception process for eval failures
- Scope: Exception requests, justification tracking, approval workflow
- Inputs: Failure data, exception requests
- Outputs: Exception process system
- Dependencies: TASK-H5-001-06
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Exceptions can be requested
- Justifications tracked
- Approval workflow works
- Tests: Exception process tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/regression/exception.py,teaagent/eval.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement automated build system for packages
- Scope: Build scripts, platform-specific builds, build artifacts
- Inputs: Source code, build configuration
- Outputs: Automated build system
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Builds automated for all platforms
- Build artifacts reproducible
- Build failures detected
- Tests: Build automation tests
- Files likely touched:
scripts/build.py,scripts/build_*.sh - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Create macOS package (pkg)
- Scope: Package creation, dependency bundling, installation script
- Inputs: Build artifacts, packaging tools
- Outputs: macOS package
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Package installs correctly
- Dependencies bundled
- Installation script works
- Tests: macOS package installation test
- Files likely touched:
scripts/package_macos.py,scripts/install_macos.sh - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Create Windows package (msi)
- Scope: Package creation, dependency bundling, installation script
- Inputs: Build artifacts, packaging tools
- Outputs: Windows package
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Package installs correctly
- Dependencies bundled
- Installation script works
- Tests: Windows package installation test
- Files likely touched:
scripts/package_windows.py,scripts/install_windows.ps1 - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Create Linux packages (deb, rpm)
- Scope: Package creation, dependency bundling, repository setup
- Inputs: Build artifacts, packaging tools
- Outputs: Linux packages
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Packages install correctly
- Dependencies specified
- Repository setup works
- Tests: Linux package installation test
- Files likely touched:
scripts/package_linux.py,scripts/install_linux.sh - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Create client-server distribution package
- Scope: Server package, client package, coordination
- Inputs: Build artifacts, server components
- Outputs: Client-server distribution
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Server package works
- Client package works
- Client-server coordination works
- Tests: Client-server integration test
- Files likely touched:
scripts/package_client_server.py,teaagent/server.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) generation
- Scope: Dependency scanning, SBOM format, SBOM generation
- Inputs: Source code, dependency data
- Outputs: SBOM generation system
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- SBOM generated in standard format
- All dependencies included
- SBOM accurate
- Tests: SBOM generation tests
- Files likely touched:
scripts/sbom.py,teaagent/sbom.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement binary signing for packages
- Scope: Signing process, key management, signature verification
- Inputs: Build artifacts, signing keys
- Outputs: Binary signing system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-001-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Binaries signed correctly
- Signatures verifiable
- Key management secure
- Tests: Binary signing tests
- Files likely touched:
scripts/sign.py,teaagent/signing.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement dependency vulnerability scanning
- Scope: Vulnerability database, scanning process, reporting
- Inputs: Dependency data, vulnerability database
- Outputs: Vulnerability scanning system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-002-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Vulnerabilities scanned
- Reports generated
- High-severity vulnerabilities block builds
- Tests: Vulnerability scanning tests
- Files likely touched:
scripts/scan_vulnerabilities.py,teaagent/security.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement package verification (signature + SBOM)
- Scope: Signature verification, SBOM verification, integrity checks
- Inputs: Package files, verification keys
- Outputs: Package verification system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-002-01, TASK-H6-002-02
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Signatures verified
- SBOM verified
- Integrity checks pass
- Tests: Package verification tests
- Files likely touched:
scripts/verify_package.py,teaagent/verification.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement update check mechanism
- Scope: Version check, update server, version comparison
- Inputs: Current version, update server
- Outputs: Update check system
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Updates checked automatically
- Version comparison correct
- Update server reliable
- Tests: Update check tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/update.py,teaagent/version.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement delta update mechanism for efficiency
- Scope: Delta generation, delta application, delta verification
- Inputs: Current version, new version
- Outputs: Delta update system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Deltas generated correctly
- Deltas applied safely
- Delta verification works
- Tests: Delta update tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/update/delta.py,teaagent/update.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement update application with rollback
- Scope: Update download, update installation, rollback mechanism
- Inputs: Update packages, current installation
- Outputs: Update application system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Updates downloaded correctly
- Updates installed safely
- Rollback works on failure
- Tests: Update application tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/update/installer.py,teaagent/update.py - Risk: High
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: Yes
- Goal: Implement changelog display in update UI
- Scope: Changelog format, changelog display, version history
- Inputs: Changelog data, version history
- Outputs: Changelog display system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-003-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Changelog displayed clearly
- Version history accessible
- Changes highlighted
- Tests: Changelog display tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/update/changelog.py,teaagent/tui/update.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement session state persistence
- Scope: Session serialization, persistence backend, session recovery
- Inputs: Session state, persistence layer
- Outputs: Session persistence system
- Dependencies: None
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Sessions serialized correctly
- Sessions persisted reliably
- Sessions recovered after restart
- Tests: Session persistence tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/session.py,teaagent/persistence.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement session listing UI
- Scope: Session discovery, session metadata, session filtering
- Inputs: Session store, session metadata
- Outputs: Session listing UI
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-004-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Sessions listed correctly
- Session metadata displayed
- Session filtering works
- Tests: Session listing tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/session/list.py,teaagent/tui/session.py - Risk: Low
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement session attach functionality
- Scope: Session attachment, state restoration, context continuity
- Inputs: Session ID, session state
- Outputs: Session attach system
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-004-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Sessions attach correctly
- State restored accurately
- Context continuous
- Tests: Session attach tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/session/attach.py,teaagent/tui/session.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
- Goal: Implement session corruption detection and recovery
- Scope: Corruption detection, recovery mechanisms, error handling
- Inputs: Session state, validation logic
- Outputs: Session corruption handling
- Dependencies: TASK-H6-004-01
- Acceptance Criteria:
- Corruption detected
- Recovery attempted
- Error handling clear
- Tests: Corruption handling tests
- Files likely touched:
teaagent/session/recovery.py,teaagent/session.py - Risk: Medium
- Parallelizable: No
- Human Review Required: No
Total Tickets: 48
- H4: 18 tickets
- H5: 15 tickets
- H6: 15 tickets
Estimated Duration: 48-96 hours (assuming 1-2 hours per ticket)
High-Risk Tickets (Human Review Required):
- TASK-H4-002-02: Role-Based Access Control
- TASK-H4-003-02: Cloud Task Intake Gateway
- TASK-H5-001-06: Release Pipeline Integration
- TASK-H5-002-03: Bundle Signing
- TASK-H5-002-04: Bundle Verification
- TASK-H6-001-05: Client-Server Distribution
- TASK-H6-002-02: Binary Signing
- TASK-H6-002-04: Package Verification
- TASK-H6-003-03: Update Application
Critical Path:
- H4-001 (TUI Cockpit) → H4-002 (Policy) → H4-003 (Background) → H4-004 (Cost)
- H4 complete → H5-001 (Eval Suite) → H5-002 (Evidence) → H5-003 (Regression)
- H5 complete → H6-001 (Packaging) → H6-002 (Signing) → H6-003 (Update) → H6-004 (Session)