You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Anchor agent trust strategy in community pain evidence
Documents current community pain around routing, memory, review cost, long-task drift, dynamic skill proof, and seven-loop governance so future work can prioritize user-visible receipts over wider autonomy.
Constraint: Latest agent pain points are mostly community signals, so docs separate official, research, and forum evidence.
Rejected: Treating Reddit/forum anecdotes as product truth because they are useful pressure signals but not controlled measurements.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Directive: Do not mark CPP/SCL/DSK mitigation rows fixed without runtime tests and audit receipts.
Tested: python3 scripts/validate_docs_consistency.py, python3 -m pytest tests/test_docs_consistency.py tests/acceptance/test_docs_acceptance_count_accuracy.py -q, git diff --cached --check.
Not-tested: Full runtime suite, because this is documentation-only strategy and roadmap work.
| Dynamic skill and long-result audit |[Dynamic Skill Generation And Long Result Audit](analysis/dynamic-skill-generation-and-long-result-audit-2026-06-05.md)|
43
+
| RSS dynamic skill failure case study |[RSS Dynamic Skill Failure Case Study](analysis/rss-failure-case-study-2026-06-05.md)|
| Seven control loops competitor survey |[Seven Control Loops Competitor Survey](analysis/seven-control-loops-competitor-survey-2026-06-05.md)|
47
+
| Seven control loops product direction |[Seven Control Loops Product Direction](strategy/seven-control-loops-product-direction-2026-06-05.md)|
48
+
| Seven control loops critical questioning |[Seven Control Loops Critical Questioning](reviews/seven-control-loops-critical-questioning-2026-06-05.md)|
49
+
| Community agent pain points |[Community Agent Pain Points Survey](analysis/community-agent-pain-points-survey-2026-06-05.md)|
42
50
43
51
## Governance
44
52
@@ -63,6 +71,12 @@ follow dated evidence documents only when you need the reasoning trail.
63
71
|[Roadmap Work Items](work-log/roadmap-work-items-2026-06-04.md)| Product roadmap work items and acceptance criteria. |
64
72
|[Phase 0 Priority Work Items](work-log/phase-0-priority-work-items-2026-06-04.md)| Trust-repair tasks derived from project-state review. |
65
73
|[Phase 0 Governance Closure Report](work-log/phase-0-governance-closure-report-2026-06-04.md)| Closure evidence for coverage omit, dependency audit, and ADR-state governance. |
74
+
|[Dynamic Skill E2E Test Roadmap](plans/dynamic-skill-e2e-test-roadmap-2026-06-05.md)| Test roadmap for generated skills, RSS fixture checks, and long result handling. |
75
+
|[Dynamic Skill And Long Result Work Items](plans/dynamic-skill-and-long-result-work-items-2026-06-05.md)| Task ledger for lifecycle states, direct-write quarantine, RSS acceptance, long-result envelopes, and behavioral evals. |
76
+
|[Dynamic Skill Lifecycle And Result Flow](architecture/dynamic-skill-lifecycle-and-result-flow-2026-06-05.md)| Architecture target for candidate install, activation, long-result preservation, and output verification. |
77
+
|[Seven Control Loops Work Items](plans/seven-control-loops-work-items-2026-06-05.md)| Cross-cutting task ledger for spec-first, dynamic workflow, goal loops, model routing, review, memory, and human gates. |
78
+
|[Seven Control Loops Integration Map](architecture/seven-control-loops-teaagent-integration-map-2026-06-05.md)| Architecture map for integrating the seven control loops into existing TeaAgent surfaces. |
79
+
|[Community Pain Points Response Plan](plans/community-pain-points-response-plan-2026-06-05.md)| Work plan for routing opacity, memory pollution, review cost, long-task drift, hook confusion, skill/MCP risk, and fake success. |
0 commit comments