docs(governance): expand boundary quick cues for ROUTE-003

Add ROUTE-003 adversarial traps to the top-of-cheatsheet boundary
summary in EN and zh-TW, with anti-drift tests scoped to that block.

Author: johnteee

reflective-prompt-library/plans/tests/test_cheatsheet_boundary_quick_cues.py

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+"""Anti-drift checks for boundary quick-cue summary in EN/zh-TW cheatsheets."""
+
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
+import pytest
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).parent))
+
+from test_validate_route_fixture import (  # noqa: E402
+    BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_EN_MARKERS,
+    BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_ZH_MARKERS,
+)
+
+SKILLS = Path(__file__).parent.parent.parent / "skills"
+EN_CHEATSHEET = SKILLS / "SKILL_TRIGGER_CHEATSHEET.md"
+ZH_CHEATSHEET = SKILLS / "SKILL_TRIGGER_CHEATSHEET.zh-TW.md"
+DISPATCH_HEADER = "## `reflective-dispatch`"
+
+
+def _boundary_quick_cues_block(text: str, header: str) -> str:
+    start = text.find(header)
+    assert start != -1, f"missing boundary quick-cue header: {header!r}"
+    end = text.find(DISPATCH_HEADER, start)
+    assert end != -1, f"missing {DISPATCH_HEADER!r} after boundary quick-cue header"
+    return text[start:end]
+
+
+@pytest.fixture(scope="module")
+def en_boundary_quick_cues() -> str:
+    return _boundary_quick_cues_block(EN_CHEATSHEET.read_text(encoding="utf-8"), BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_EN_MARKERS[0])
+
+
+@pytest.fixture(scope="module")
+def zh_boundary_quick_cues() -> str:
+    return _boundary_quick_cues_block(ZH_CHEATSHEET.read_text(encoding="utf-8"), BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_ZH_MARKERS[0])
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("marker", BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_EN_MARKERS)
+def test_boundary_quick_cues_present_in_english_summary(en_boundary_quick_cues: str, marker: str):
+    assert marker in en_boundary_quick_cues, f"English boundary quick-cue summary missing: {marker!r}"
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("marker", BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_ZH_MARKERS)
+def test_boundary_quick_cues_present_in_zh_tw_summary(zh_boundary_quick_cues: str, marker: str):
+    assert marker in zh_boundary_quick_cues, f"zh-TW boundary quick-cue summary missing: {marker!r}"

reflective-prompt-library/plans/tests/test_validate_route_fixture.py

@@ -116,6 +116,29 @@ def test_round_51_boundary_probes():
 # One canonical phrase per ROUTE-003 adversarial group (excluding implement_not_plan_trap / R11).
 ROUTE_003_ADVERSARIAL_CHEATSHEET_CUES = tuple(text for text, _ in ROUTE_003_ADVERSARIAL_BOUNDARY_PROBES)
 
+# Top-of-cheatsheet boundary quick-cue summary markers (ROUTE-002 holdout + ROUTE-003 adversarial).
+BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_EN_MARKERS = (
+    "Boundary quick cues (ROUTE-002 holdout + ROUTE-003 adversarial):",
+    "**Plan-only (no code)**",
+    "**Plain review (non-production)**",
+    "**Approved spec delivery**",
+    "**Brief before plan**",
+    "**Research not brief**",
+    "**Trivial fix not review**",
+    "**Production risk not plain review**",
+)
+
+BOUNDARY_QUICK_CUE_ZH_MARKERS = (
+    "邊界速查（ROUTE-002 holdout + ROUTE-003 adversarial）：",
+    "**僅規劃不寫程式**",
+    "**非正式環境審查**",
+    "**已核准規格落地**",
+    "**規劃前先釐清**",
+    "**研究不是釐清**",
+    "**小修不是審查**",
+    "**正式環境風險不是一般審查**",
+)
+
 
 def test_route_003_adversarial_boundary_probes():
     """Anti-drift: ROUTE-003 adversarial boundaries route as fixture expects."""

reflective-prompt-library/skills/SKILL_TRIGGER_CHEATSHEET.md

@@ -21,10 +21,14 @@ Routing fairness note:
 - When a task uses external content, tool outputs, entity-like records, or side-effectful actions, apply `04-agent/runtime-trust-boundary.md` as a supporting lens with the selected skill.
 
 
-Boundary quick cues (ROUTE-002 holdout):
+Boundary quick cues (ROUTE-002 holdout + ROUTE-003 adversarial):
 - **Plan-only (no code)** → `reflective-spec-plan` — tickets, rollout plans, or acceptance criteria with explicit no-code context.
 - **Plain review (non-production)** → `reflective-review` — diff/PR review for readability or regressions when production risk is out of scope.
 - **Approved spec delivery** → `reflective-implement` — implement or land an approved spec in the repository; not plan-only.
+- **Brief before plan** → `reflective-brief` — narrow scope or stakeholder alignment before PRD/tickets.
+- **Research not brief** → `reflective-research` — multi-voice debates or source-backed comparisons, not goal clarification.
+- **Trivial fix not review** → `reflective-implement` — small code patches in the repo, not diff review.
+- **Production risk not plain review** → `reflective-risk` — auth/production/billing changes need a risk gate, not readability review.
 
 ## `reflective-dispatch`
 

reflective-prompt-library/skills/SKILL_TRIGGER_CHEATSHEET.zh-TW.md

@@ -22,10 +22,14 @@ Skill 契約語言：
 若任務包含外部內容、工具輸出、entity-like records 或有副作用的行動，請把 `04-agent/runtime-trust-boundary.md` 作為所選 skill 的輔助檢查鏡頭。
 
 
-邊界速查（ROUTE-002 holdout）：
+邊界速查（ROUTE-002 holdout + ROUTE-003 adversarial）：
 - **僅規劃不寫程式** → `reflective-spec-plan` — 工單、驗收標準或 rollout 計畫且明確不要改程式。
 - **非正式環境審查** → `reflective-review` — 審查 PR/diff 可讀性或 regression，且明確排除正式環境風險評估。
 - **已核准規格落地** → `reflective-implement` — 在 repository 實作或落地已核准 spec；不是僅規劃。
+- **規劃前先釐清** → `reflective-brief` — 在 PRD/工單前先收窄 scope 或對齊利害關係人。
+- **研究不是釐清** → `reflective-research` — 多視角辯論或來源查證，不是 goal clarification。
+- **小修不是審查** → `reflective-implement` — repo 內小 patch，不是 diff review。
+- **正式環境風險不是一般審查** → `reflective-risk` — auth/production/billing 變更需要 risk gate。
 
 ## `reflective-dispatch`