Skip to content

Commit feb31b6

Browse files
johnteeeclaude
andcommitted
Record Hyperplan evaluation as a no-change row, not a dedicated file
Hyperplan (OMO adversarial multi-agent planning) was evaluated: no change. Its value is a multi-agent runtime (agent swarm + team_* tools), which hits two standing non-goals; its methodology layer overlaps existing lenses; three possible gaps (defend/refine/concede, evidence grade, assumption ledger) are not promoted (gate unmet). Record it the same minimal way as Loop-Skill / preflight / Record&Replay: a row in the consolidated external-adoption case study plus a Decision Index pointer — not a dedicated per-tool reflection file, which would contradict this case study's own Rejected Alternatives. Drop the dedicated file, repoint both references to the case study, regenerate index. Verified: project-knowledge, links, lint, governance, 52 tests all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 parent dd6c1d8 commit feb31b6

3 files changed

Lines changed: 6 additions & 4 deletions

File tree

reflective-prompt-library/PROJECT_KNOWLEDGE.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -80,3 +80,4 @@ Language: English
8080
- 2026-06-17 Refine the contract from non-normative to non-authoritative, connect promotion, and publish a reusable scaffold → [decision](plans/project-knowledge-authority-promotion-decision-2026-06-17.md)
8181
- 2026-06-18 Adopt STORM's source-grounded perspective discovery as an optional `reflective-research` method, not a new skill → [record](plans/storm-perspective-discovery-reflection-2026-06-18.md)
8282
- 2026-06-20 Synthesize external-adoption case studies, then correct the evidence and promotion-gate scope after the Test Plan routing counterexample → [record](plans/external-adoption-case-studies-2026-06-20.md)
83+
- 2026-06-21 Evaluate Hyperplan / multi-agent adversarial planning — no change (runtime = non-goal; methodology overlaps; possible gaps not promoted) → [record](plans/external-adoption-case-studies-2026-06-20.md)

reflective-prompt-library/index.json

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
11
{
22
"version": "1.0",
3-
"generated_at": "2026-06-20T16:43:00.922515",
3+
"generated_at": "2026-06-21T23:28:08.802356",
44
"repo_root": ".",
55
"categories": {
66
"prompt-library": {
@@ -1501,8 +1501,8 @@
15011501
"text": "State Ledger"
15021502
}
15031503
],
1504-
"line_count": 161,
1505-
"char_count": 9690
1504+
"line_count": 162,
1505+
"char_count": 10099
15061506
},
15071507
{
15081508
"path": "reflective-prompt-library/plans/ROUTING_CONTRACT.md",

reflective-prompt-library/plans/external-adoption-case-studies-2026-06-20.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ own promotion gate (≥3 cross-session recurrences); the individual tools did no
2525
| 2026-06-20 | Loop-Skill | GitHub API (created 2026-06-17, no LICENSE, 19★, single-day) | no | No change — methodology complete, runtime is a non-goal, gate unmet | this file |
2626
| 2026-06-20 | preflight-checker | GitHub API (created 2026-06-19, no LICENSE, 0★, 0.1.0) | no | No change — UX patterns already in `reflective-review`; missing items out of scope | this file |
2727
| 2026-06-20 | Codex Record & Replay | OpenAI official docs | operational, not methodological | No change *to TeaPrompt* — the gap is real but operational (acquisition / persistence / replay), which is a standing non-goal; R&R is vendor-locked and uncopyable. Worth using as an external acquisition front-end | this file |
28+
| 2026-06-21 | Hyperplan / multi-agent adversarial planning (OMO) | GitHub repo (code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent) SKILL.md | no — runtime hits non-goals; methodology mostly covered | No change — Hyperplan runtime is agent swarm + runtime engine (both non-goals); methodology layer overlaps existing lenses; three possible gaps (Defend/Refine/Concede, Evidence Grade, Assumption Ledger) not promoted | this file |
2829

2930
## The Recurring Evaluation Procedure
3031

@@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ skill) or correct the gap. Until then it stays a lesson plus this case study.
153154

154155
| Item | Status | Evidence |
155156
| --- | --- | --- |
156-
| Three no-change outcomes recorded | done | Case Comparison table |
157+
| Four no-change outcomes recorded | done | Case Comparison table |
157158
| Recurring procedure captured | done | this file + PROJECT_KNOWLEDGE Durable Lesson |
158159
| Durable Lesson + Decision Index added | done | PROJECT_KNOWLEDGE.md |
159160
| No new skill or directory created | done | Rejected Alternatives |

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)