feat(edgeai): Add a guide on EdgeAI memory carveout overlay#375
Merged
Conversation
cshilwant
requested review from
VeeruPrudhvi,
aniket-l,
praneethbajjuri and
uditkumarti
as code owners
|
New warnings found with rstcheck: |
* From SDK 11.1, the EdgeAI memory carveouts are maintained as a separate overlay - k3-am62a7-sk-edgeai.dtbo Hence, add an FAQ for users on the same * While at it, also fix the faq.rst to follow guidelines for section headers as per [0] [0]: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html#sections Signed-off-by: Chirag Shilwant <c-shilwant@ti.com>
jeevantelukula
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
shiva-ti
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
From SDK 11.1, the EdgeAI memory carveouts are maintained as a separate overlay - k3-am62a7-sk-edgeai.dtbo
Hence, add an FAQ for users on the same
While at it, also fix the faq.rst to follow guidelines for section headers as per 0